Abstract
Supply Chain performance measurement is a vital issue for supply chain management. Both from the academia and professional life, various models are proposed for this subject. In this chapter, the literature is investigated for current performance measurement models and a multi-criteria decision making approach is proposed for supply chain performance measurement. In this study, SCOR model is used for structuring the problem, Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is used to determine the importance weights of the criteria and finally Fuzzy VIKOR is used to rank the alternatives based on expert evaluations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Baykasoglu, A., Kaplanoglu, V.: Application of activity-based costing to a land transportation company: a case study. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 116(2), 308–324 (2008)
Beamon, B.M.: Supply chain design and analysis: models and methods. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 55, 281–294 (1998)
Bhagwat, R., Sharma, M.K.: Performance measurement of supply chain management: a balanced scorecard approach. Comput. Ind. Eng. 53(1), 43–62 (2007a)
Bhagwat, R., Sharma, M.K.: Performance measurement of supply chain management using the analytical hierarchy process. Prod. Plann. Control 18(8), 666–680 (2007b)
Bhagwat, R., Sharma, M.K.: An application of the integrated AHP-PGP model for performance measurement of supply chain management. Prod. Plann. Control 20(8), 678–690 (2009)
Brewer, P.C., Speh, T.W.: Using the balanced scorecard to measure supply chain performance. J. Bus. Logistics 21(1), 75–94 (2000)
Buckley, J.J.: Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Syst. 17, 233–247 (1985)
Cagnazzo, L., Taticchi, P., Brun, A.: The role of performance measurement systems to support quality improvement initiatives at supply chain level. Int. J. Prod. Perform. Manage. 59(2), 163–185 (2010)
Chan, F.T.S.: Performance measurement in a supply chain. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 21(7), 534–548 (2003)
Chan, F.T.S., Qi, H.: An innovative performance measurement method for supply chain management. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 8(3), 209–223 (2003)
Chang, D.Y.: Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP European. J.Oper. Res. 95, 649–655 (1996)
Chen, L.Y., Wang, T.C.: Optimizing partners’ choice in IS/IT outsourcing projects: the strategic decision of fuzzy VIKOR. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 120(1), 233–242 (2009)
Cooper, M.C., Lambert, D.M., Pagh, J.D.: Supply chain management: more than a new name for logistics. Int. J. Logistics Manage. 8(1), 1–14 (1997)
El-Baz, M.A.: Fuzzy performance measurement of a supply chain in manufacturing companies. Expert Syst. Appl 38(6), 6681–6688 (2011)
Elgazzar, S.H., Tipi, N.S., Hubbard, N.J., Leach, D.Z.: Linking supply chain processes performance to a company’s financial strategic objectives. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 223(1), 276–289 (2012)
Estampe, D., Lamouri, S., Paris, J.-L., Brahim-Djelloul, S.: A framework for analysing supply chain performance evaluation models. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 142(2), 247–258 (2013)
Felix, T.S., Chan, H.Q.: Feasibility of performance measurement system for supply chain: a process-based approach and measures. Integr. Manuf. Syst. 14(3), 179–190 (2003)
Folan, P., Browne, J., Jagdev, H.: Performance: Its meaning and content for today’s business research. Comput. Ind. 58, 605–620 (2007)
Forme, F.-A.G.L., Genoulaz, V.B., Campagne, J.-P.: A framework to analyse collaborative performance. Comput. Ind. 58(7), 687–697 (2007)
Ganga, G.M.D., Carpinetti, L.C.R.: A fuzzy logic approach to supply chain performance management. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 134(1), 177–187 (2011)
Gilmour, P.: A strategic audit framework to improve supply chain performance. J. Bus. Ind. Mark. 14(5), 355–366 (1999)
Gou, J., Shen, G., Chai, R.: Model of service-oriented catering supply chain performance evaluation. J. Ind. Eng. Manage. 6(1), 215–226 (2013)
Gunasekaran, A., Patel, C., McGaughey, R.E.: A framework for supply chain performance measurement. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 87(3), 333–347 (2004)
Harris, J.K., Swatman, P.M.: Efficient consumer response (ECR): a survey of the Australian grocery industry. Supply Chain Manage. Int. J. 4(1), 35–42 (1999)
Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P.: The Balanced Scorecard—Measures That Drive Performance. Harvard Business Review, January–February, pp. 71–79 (1992)
Kulak, O., Kahraman, C.: Fuzzy Multi-Attribute Selection Among Transportation Companies Using Axiomatic Design and Analytic Hierarchy Process. Inf. Sci. 170, 191–210 (2005)
Kurnia, S., Johnston, R.B.: Adoption of efficient consumer response: the issue of mutuality. Supply Chain Manage Int. J. 6(5), 230–241 (2001)
Lambert, D.M., Pohlen, T.L.: Supply chain metrics. Int. J. Logistics Manage. 12(1), 1–19 (2001)
Lebas, M.: Performance measurement and performance management. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 41, 23–25 (1995)
Li, S., Rao, S.S., Ragu-Nathan, T., Ragu-Nathan, B.: Development and validation of a measurement instrument for studying supply chain management practices. J. Opertions Manage. 23(6), 618–641 (2005)
Lin, R.-J.: Using fuzzy DEMATEL to evaluate the green supply chain management practices. J. Cleaner Prod. 40, 32–39 (2013)
Lohtia, R., Tian, F., Xie, Subramaniam, R.: Efficient consumer response in Japan: Industry concerns, current status, benefits, and barriers to implementation. J. Bus. Res. 57(3), 306–311 (2004)
McCormac, K., Wilkerson, T., Marrow, D., Davey, M., Shah, M., Yee, D.: Managing Risk in Your Organization with the SCOR Methodology, http://supply-chain.org/f/Supply%20Chain%20Risk%20Project%20Report.pdf(2008)
Meyer, M.W.: Rethinking Performance Measurement: Beyond the Balanced Scorecard. Cambridge University Press, New York (2002)
Moussa, A.M., Kamdem, J.S., Terraza, M.: Fuzzy risk adjusted performance measures: Application to Hedge funds, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Article in press (2012)
Naini, S.G.J., Aliahmadi, A.R., Jafari-Eskandari, M.: Designing a mixed performance measurement system for environmental supply chain management using evolutionary game theory and balanced scorecard: a case study of an auto industry supply chain. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 55(6), 593–603 (2011)
Najmi, A., Makui, A.: Providing hierarchical approach for measuring supply chain performance using AHP and DEMATEL methodologies. Int. J. Ind. Eng. Comput. 1, 199–212 (2010)
Odette.: 2013. www.odette.org/html/home.htm. (Accessed:24/03/2013)
Opricovic, S., Tzeng, G.H.: Compromise solution by MCDM methods: a comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 156, 445–455 (2004)
Pan, N.F., Lin, T.C., Pan, N.H.: Estimating bridge performance based on a matrix-driven fuzzy linear regression model. Autom. Constr. 18(5), 578–586 (2009)
Qian, L., Ben-Arieh, D.: Parametric cost estimation based on activity-based costing: a case study for design and development of rotational parts. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 113(2), 805–818 (2008)
Ravi, V., Shankar, R., Tiwari, M.K.: Analyzing alternatives in reverse logistics for end-of-life computers: ANP and balanced scorecard approach. Comput. Ind. Eng. 48(2), 327–356 (2005)
Saaty, T.L.: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw Hill. RWS Publications, New York (1980)
Sanayei, A., Mousavi, S.F., Yazdankhah, A.: Group decision making process for supplier selection with VIKOR under fuzzy environment. Expert Syst. Appl. 37(1), 24–30 (2010)
SCC (2010). Supply Chain Council SCOR Model Version 10.00—Appendix A., Available at: http://supply-chain.org/f/SCOR%208.0%20Metrics%20tables.pdf
Schulze, M., Seuring, S., Ewering, C.: Applying activity-based costing in a supply chain environment. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 135(2), 716–725 (2012)
Shemshadi, A., Shirazi, H., Toreihi, M., Tarokh, M.J.: A fuzzy VIKOR method for supplier selection based on entropy measure for objective weighting. Expert Syst. Appl. 38(10), 12160–12167 (2011)
Stapleton, D., Hanna, J.B., Yagla, S., Johnson Markussen, D.: Measuring logistics performance using the strategic profit model. Int. J. Logistics Manage. 13(1), 89–107 (2002)
Theeranuphattana, A., Tang, J.C., Khang, D.B.: An integrated approach to measuring supply chain performance. Ind. Eng. Manage. Syst. 11(1), 54–69 (2012)
Tsai, W.-H., Hung, S.-J.: A fuzzy goal programming approach for green supply chain optimisation under activity-based costing and performance evaluation with a value-chain structure. Int. J. Prod. Res. 47(18), 4991–5017 (2009)
van Laarhoven, P.J.M., Pedrycz, W.: A fuzzy extension of Saaty’s priority theory. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 11, 229–241 (1983)
Wang, G., Huang, S.H., Dismukes, J.P.: Product-driven supply chain selection using integrated multi-criteria decision-making methodology. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 91(1), 1–15 (2004)
Yalcin, N., Bayrakdaroglu, A., Kahraman, C.: Application of fuzzy multi-criteria decision making methods for financial performance evaluation of Turkish manufacturing industries. Expert Syst. Appl. 39(1), 350–364 (2012)
Yu, P.L.: A class of solutions for group decision problems. Manage. Sci. 19, 936–946 (1973)
Yu, X., Guo, S., Guo, J., Huang, X.: Rank B2C e-commerce websites in e-alliance based on AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS. Expert Syst. Appl. 38(4), 3550–3557 (2011)
Zadeh, L.: Fuzzy Sets. Inf. Control 8, 338–353 (1965)
Zeleny, M.: Multiple Criteria Decision Making. McGraw-Hill, New York (1982)
Zhihong, W., Yan, W., He, W.: Performance evaluation indicator system and model construction of the green supply chain. In: Intelligent system design and engineering applications, pp. 1042–1044 (2013)
Zhou, Z., Zhao, L., Lui, S., Ma, C.: A generalized fuzzy DEA/AR performance assessment model. Math. Comput. Modell. 55(11/12), 2117–2128 (2012)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Öztayşi, B., Sürer, Ö. (2014). Supply Chain Performance Measurement Using a SCOR Based Fuzzy VIKOR Approach. In: Kahraman, C., Öztayşi, B. (eds) Supply Chain Management Under Fuzziness. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol 313. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-53939-8_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-53939-8_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-53938-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-53939-8
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)