Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Social Business and Poverty Alleviation: Lessons from Grameen Danone and Grameen Veolia

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Social Business

Abstract

Since Muhammad Yunus first began launching joint ventures with multinational corporations such as Group Danone (2006) and Veolia Water (2008) in Bangladesh, his social business concept has received international attention. With reference to empirical findings from a comprehensive field study in rural Bangladesh, this paper suggests that Yunus’ early social business joint ventures do contribute to poverty reduction in terms of the sustainable livelihoods approach. Both Grameen Danone Foods and Grameen Veolia Water Ltd. provide low-income consumers with access to products for their basic needs, while at the same time creating new sources of social and economic capital. However, considering the multidimensional character of poverty, the findings are not suggestive of a panacea. Given the fact that the conscious abdication of personal financial gain by those who invest in a social business company is the defining attribute in Yunus’ concept, the authors conclude that his idea is primarily a strong plea for social entrepreneurship. It is a strong call for the efficient use of philanthropic resources in contrast with a more conventional charity approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahmed, Z. (2011). Social business and new economics paradigm – one that places people at the centre, not on the periphery. The Journal of Social Business, 1(1), 3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alt, F., & Spiegel, P. (2009). Gute Geschäfte: Humane Marktwirtschaft als Ausweg aus der Krise. Berlin: Aufbau Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alter, S. K. (2007). Social enterprise typology 2007 [cited 15 June 2010]. Available from http://www.virtueventures.com/setypology.pdf

  • Ashoka (2009). Ashoka (Innovators for the Public) 2009 [cited 28 Aug 2009]. Available from http://ashoka.org/international

  • Bohle, H., Downing, T., Field, J., & Ibrahim, F. N. (1993). Coping with vulnerability and criticality. Case studies on food-insecure people and places. Saarbrücken/Fort Lauderdale: Verlag für Entwicklungspolitik.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bornstein, D. (2007). How to change the world: Social entrepreneurs and the power of new ideas. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, B., & Aßheuer, T. (2011). Floods in megacity environments: Vulnerability and coping strategies of slum dwellers in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Natural Hazards, 58(2), 771–787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruton, G. D., Ahlstrom, D., & Obloj, K. (2008). Entrepreneurship in emerging economies: Where are we today and where should the research go in the future. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 32(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2007). Business research methods (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R. (1995). Poverty and livelihoods: Whose reality counts? Environment and Urbanization, 7(1), 173–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R., & Conway, G. (1992). Sustainable rural livelihoods: Practical concepts for the 21st century. In IDS Discussion Paper. Sussex, Brighton: Institute of Development Studies (IDS), University of Sussex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dees, J. G. (2001). The meaning of “social entrepreneurship” 2001 [cited 3 June 2009]. Available from http://www.caseatduke.org/documents/dees_sedef.pdf

  • Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. The Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, C., Baker, R., McHugh, N., Gillespie, M., Sinclair, S., Cornish, F., Cheater, F., Godwin, J., & Tombs, J. (2011). Markets and health in the home of Smith and Yunus. The Journal of Social Business, 1(1), 24–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dougherty, L. (2009). Putting poverty in museums: Strategies to encourage the creation of the for-profit social business. Boston Third World Law Journal, 29(2), 357–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E., Wicks, A. C., & Parmar, B. (2004). Stakeholder theory and ‘the corporate objective revisited’. Organization Science, 15(3), 364–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (2007). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. In W. C. Zimmerli, M. Holzinger, & K. Richter (Eds.), Corporate ethics and corporate governance (pp. 173–178). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, A. L., & Miles, S. (2006). Stakeholders: Theory and practice. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frumkin, P. (2002). On being nonprofit: Conceptual and policy primer. London/Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grameen Group, & Danone Asia Pte Ltd. (2006). Grameen Danone Foods (A social business enterprise): Joint venture agreement – Key principles. Internal document. Dhaka/Singapore: Grameen Group/Danone Asia Pte Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • GVW. (2009). Grameen Veolia Water Ltd. (Flyer). Dhaka: Grameen Veolia Water Ltd. (GVW).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackenberg, H., & Empter, S. (Eds.). (2011). Social entrepreneurship – Social business: Für die Gesellschaft unternehmen. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, A. L., Kramer, W. J., Katz, R. S., Tran, J. T., & Walker, C. (2007). The next 4 billion: Market size and business strategy at the base of the pyramid. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute and International Finance Corporation (IFC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansmann, H. (1986). The role of nonprofit enterprise. In S. Rose-Ackerman (Ed.), The economics of nonprofit institutions: Studies in structure and policy (pp. 58–84). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S. L. (2007). Capitalism at the crossroads: Aligning business, earth, and humanity (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Wharton School Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, M. (2008). Corporate social responsibility and international development: Is business the solution? London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humberg, K. (2011). Poverty reduction through social business? Lessons learnt from Grameen Joint Ventures in Bangladesh. München: Oekom verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krantz, L. (2001). The sustainable livelihood approach to poverty reduction: An introduction division for policy and socio-economic analysis. Stockholm: Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlemann, A.-K. (2010). Social business: Corporate citizenship 2.0. In H. Backhaus-Maul, C. Biedermann, S. Nährlich, & J. Polterauer (Eds.), Corporate citizenship in Deutschland: Gesellschaftliches Engagement von Unternehmen. Bilanz und Perspektiven (pp. 706–710). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, S., Heacock, D., & Stupnytska, A. (2007). Beyond the BRICS: A look at the “Next 11”. In G. Sachs (Ed.), BRICS and Beyond (pp. 131–164). New York Goldman Sachs Global Economics Department.

    Google Scholar 

  • London, T. (2009). Making better investments at the base of the pyramid. Harvard Business Review, 87(5), 106–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauksch, S., Engelke, H., Darkow, I.-L., & Gracht, H. v. d. (2011). Soziale Vision oder rentables Geschäftsmodell? Social Business in Deutschland 2030, ed. Center für Zukunftsforschung und Wissensmanagement. Wiesbaden: EBS Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menascé, D., & Dalsace, F. (2011). Getting involved: BOP versus social business. The Journal of Social Business, 1(1), 117–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, A. (2008). Social entrepreneurship: New models of sustainable social change. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuscheler, F. (2008). Die umstrittene Wirksamkeit der Entwicklungszusammenarbeit. In INEF-Report. Duisburg: Universität Duisburg/Essen, Institut für Entwicklung und Frieden.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2009). ODA Net (1950–2008). Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) 2009 [cited 24 Aug 2009]. Available from www.oecd.org/dataoecd/43/24/1894385.xls

  • Osterwalder, A. (2004). The business model ontology. A proposition in a design science approach. Ph.D. dissertation, l’Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales, Université de Lausanne, Lausanne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., & Tucci, C. L. (2005). Clarifying business models: Origins, present, and future of the concept. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 15(May), 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value: How to reinvent capitalism – and unleash a wave of innovation and growth. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2), 62–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K. (2006). The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid: Eradicating poverty through profits, enabling dignity and choice through markets. Upper Saddle River: Wharton School Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prasso, S. (2007). Saving the world with a cup of yogurt 2007 [cited 15 Mar 2011]. Available from http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2007/02/05/8399198/index.htm

  • Rahman, A. A., Alam, M., Alam, S. S., Uzzaman, M. R., Rashid, M., & Rabbani, G. (2007). Risks, vulnerability and adaptation in Bangladesh. In UNDP Human Development Report. Dhaka: Bangladesh Centre for Advanced Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauch, T. (2007). Von basic needs zu MDGs: Vier Jahrzehnte Armutsbekämpfung in Wissenschaft und Praxis und kein bisschen weiter. Peripherie, 107(27), 216–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauch, T. (2009). Entwicklungspolitik: Theorien, Strategien, Instrumente. Braunschweig: Westermann Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauch, T., & Redder, A. (1987). Autozentrierte Entwicklung in ressourcenarmen ländlichen Regionen durch kleinräumige Wirtschaftskreisläufe. Die Erde, 118, 109–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, H. (2007). The social business: The viability of a new business entity type. Williamette Law Review, 44(1), 131–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholz, F. (2004). Geographische Entwicklungsforschung – Methoden und Theorien. Berlin/Stuttgart: Borntraeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scoones, I. (1998). Sustainable rural livelihoods: A framework for analysis. In IDS working paper 72. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies (IDS), University of Sussex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scoones, I. (2009). Livelihoods perspectives and rural development. Journal of Peasant Studies, 36(1), 171–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, P. (2009). Poverty dynamics: Interdisciplinary perspectives. Journal of Development Studies, 45(5), 823–825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, A. (2011). Adam Smith: Science and human nature. The Journal of Social Business, 1(1), 24–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobhan, R. (2010). Challenging the injustice of poverty: Agendas for inclusive development in South Asia, New Delhi. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Spicker, P. (2007). The idea of poverty. Bristol: The Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiegel, P. (2011). Social impact business – Soziale und ökologische Probleme unternehmerisch lösen. In H. Hackenberg & S. Empter (Eds.), Social entrepreneurship – Social business: Für die Gesellschaft unternehmen (pp. 133–146). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Struthers, J. J. (2011). Finance and banking in alleviating poverty: Microcredit and microfinance in an age of financial crises. The Journal of Social Business, 1(1), 62–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (2010). Carpe crisis: Capitalizing on the breakdown of capitalism to consider the creation of social businesses. New York Law School Review, 54(October), 743–771.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP. (2008). Creating value for all: Strategies for doing business with the poor. In Growing inclusive markets: Business works for development – Development works for business. New York: United Nations Development Program (UNDP).

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (1995). Report on the world summit for social development. In World summit for social development. Copenhagen: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (2008). The business case for corporate societal engagement: Development and evaluation of value creating societal strategies. München: Oekom Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yunus, M. (2006a). Nobel lecture “We can put poverty into museums.” Paper read at The Nobel Peace Prize Ceremony 2006. Oslo, 10 Dec 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yunus, M. (2007a). Social business entrepreneurs are the solution. Grameen Communications 2005a [cited 29 May 2007]. Available from http://www.grameen-info.org/bank/socialbusinessentrepreneurs.htm

  • Yunus, M. (2007b). Creating a world without poverty: Social business and the future of capitalism. New York: Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yunus, M. (2007c). Social business. GDI-Impuls, 25(3), 40–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yunus, M. (2008). Social business for a new global economic architecture. Paper read at Glasgow University’s Adam Smith Lecture. Glasgow, 1 Dec 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yunus, M. (2010). Building social business – The new kind of capitalism that serves humanity’s most pressing needs. New York: Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Geography, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany

    Kerstin Humberg & Boris Braun

Authors
  1. Kerstin Humberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Boris Braun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kerstin Humberg .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. California Institute For Social Business, California State University Channel Islands, Camarillo, California, USA

    Andrea Grove

  2. California Institute For Social Business, California State University Channel Islands, Camarillo, California, USA

    Gary A. Berg

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Humberg, K., Braun, B. (2014). Social Business and Poverty Alleviation: Lessons from Grameen Danone and Grameen Veolia. In: Grove, A., Berg, G. (eds) Social Business. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45275-8_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation