Abstract
Antihydrogen—the antimatter equivalent of the hydrogen atom—is of fundamental interest as a test bed for universal symmetries—such as CPT and the Weak Equivalence Principle for gravitation. Invariance under CPT requires that hydrogen and antihydrogen have the same spectrum. Antimatter is of course intriguing because of the observed baryon asymmetry in the universe—currently unexplained by the Standard Model. At the CERN Antiproton Decelerator (AD) [1], several groups have been working diligently since 1999 to produce, trap, and study the structure and behaviour of the antihydrogen atom. One of the main thrusts of the AD experimental program is to apply precision techniques from atomic physics to the study of antimatter. Such experiments complement the high-energy searches for physics beyond the Standard Model. Antihydrogen is the only atom of antimatter to be produced in the laboratory. This is not so unfortunate, as its matter equivalent, hydrogen, is one of the most well-understood and accurately measured systems in all of physics. It is thus very compelling to undertake experimental examinations of the structure of antihydrogen. As experimental spectroscopy of antihydrogen has yet to begin in earnest, I will give here a brief introduction to some of the ion and atom trap developments necessary for synthesizing and trapping antihydrogen, so that it can be studied.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
S. Maury, The antiproton decelerator: AD. Hyp. Int. 109, 4352 (1997)
G. Baur et al., Production of antihydrogen, Phys. Lett. B 368(3), 251 (1996). Bibcode:1996PhLB.368.251B. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(96)00005-6
G. Blanford et al., Observation of antihydrogen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80(14), 3037 (1998). Bibcode:1998PhRvL.80.3037B. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.3037
G. Gabrielse et al., First capture of antiprotons in a penning trap: a kiloelectronvolt source. Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 2504–2507 (1986)
G. Gabrielse et al., Cooling and slowing of trapped antiprotons below 100 meV. Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 13601363 (1989)
C.M. Surko, R.G. Greaves, Emerging science and technology of antimatter plasmas and trap-based beams. Phys. Plasmas 11, 2333–2348 (2004)
L.V. Jorgensen et al., New source of dense cryogenic positron plasmas. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 025002 (2005)
M. Amoretti et al., Production and detection of cold antihydrogen atoms. Nature 419, 456459 (2002)
G.B. Andresen et al., Trapped antihydrogen. Nature 468, 673–676 (2010)
C. Amole et al., ALPHA collaboration, confinement of antihydrogen for 1000 seconds. Nat. Phys. 7, 558 (2011)
C. Amole et al., Resonant quantum transitions in trapped antihydrogen atoms. Nature 483, 439 (2012)
C. Amole et al., Description and first application of a new technique to measure the gravitational mass of antihydrogen. Nat. Commun. 4, 1785 (2012)
G. Gabrielse et al., Trapped antihydrogen in its ground state. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 113002 (2012)
E. Widmann et al., Measurement of the hyperfine structure of antihydrogen in a beam, Hyp. Int. 215, 1 (2013) (http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10751-013-0809-6)
Y. Enomoto et al., Synthesis of cold antihydrogen in a cusp trap, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 243401 (2010) (http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett. 105.243401)
A. Kellerbauer et al., (AEgIS collaboration), proposed antimatter gravity measurement with an antihydrogen beam. Nucl. Inst. Meth. B 266, 351 (2008). doi:10.1016/j.nimb.2007.12.010
P. Perez, Y. Sacquin, The GBAR experiment: gravitational behaviour of antihydrogen at rest. Class. Quantum Grav. 29, 184008 (2012)
G. Gabrielse, S.L. Rolston, L. Haarsma, W. Kells, Antihydrogen production using trapped plasmas. Phys. Lett. A 129, 38 (1988)
M. Amoretti et al., High rate production of antihydrogen. Phys. Lett. B 578, 23–32 (2004)
N. Madsen et al., Spatial distribution of cold antihydrogen formation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 033403 (2005)
G. Gabrielse et al., Background-free observation of cold antihydrogen with field ionization analysis of its states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 213401 (2002)
X.-P. Huang, F. Anderegg, E.M. Hollmann, C.F. Driscoll, T.M. ONeil, Steady-state confinement of non-neutral plasmas by rotating electric fields, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 875 (1997)
G.B. Andresen et al., Compression of antiproton clouds for antihydrogen trapping. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 203401 (2008)
G.B. Andresen et al., Antiproton, positron, and electron imaging with a microchannel plate/phosphor detector. Rev. Sci. Inst. 80, 123701 (2009)
N. Kuroda et al., Radial compression of an antiproton cloud for production of intense antiproton beams. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 203402 (2008)
M.D. Tinkle et al., Low-order modes as diagnostics of spheroidal non-neutral plasmas. Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 352 (1994)
M.D. Tinkle, R.G. Greave, C.M. Surko, Low-order longitudinal modes of single-component plasmas. Phys. Plasmas 2, 2880 (1995)
M. Amoretti et al., Complete nondestructive diagnostic of nonneutral plasmas based on the detection of electrostatic modes. Phys. Plasmas 10, 3056 (2003)
M. Amoretti et al., Positron plasma diagnostic and temperature control for antihydrogen production. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 055001 (2003)
C. Amole et al., In-situ electromagnetic field diagnostics with an electron plasma in a Penning-Malmberg trap. New J. Phys. (Submitted) (2013)
W. Bertsche et al., A magnetic trap for antihydrogen confinement. Nucl. Inst. Meth. A 566, 746 (2006)
J. Fajans, W. Bertsche, K. Burke, S.F. Chapman, D.P van der Werf. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 15501 (2005)
J. Fajans, A. Schmidt, Malmberg-penning and minimum-B trap compatibility: the advantages of higher-order multipole traps. Nucl. Inst. Meth. A 521, 318 (2004)
G. Andresen et al., Antimatter plasmas in a multipole trap for antihydrogen. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 023402 (2007)
G. Gabrielse et al., Antihydrogen production within a penning-ioffe trap. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 113001 (2008)
G. Andresen et al., The ALPHA detector: module production and assembly. JINST 7, C01051 (2012). doi:10.1088/1748-0221/7/01/C01051
C. Amole et al., Discriminating between antihydrogen and mirror-trapped antiprotons in a minimum-B trap. New J. Phys. 14, 105010 (2012)
C.G. Parthey et al., Improved measurement of the hydrogen 1S2S transition frequency. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 203001 (2011)
G. Gabrielse et al., First measurement of the velocity of slow antihydrogen atoms. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, (2004)
F. Robicheaux, Simulations of antihydrogen formation. Phys. Rev. A 70, 022510 (2004)
J. Fajans, L. Friedland, Autoresonant (nonstationary) excitation of pendulums, plutinos, plasmas, and other nonlinear oscillators. Am. J. Phys. 69, 1096 (2001)
I. Barth, L. Friedland, E. Sarid, A.G. Shagalov, Autoresonant transition in the presence of noise and self-fields. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 155001 (2009)
C. Amole et al., Experimental and computational study of the injection of antiprotons into a positron plasma for antihydrogen production. Phys. Plasmas 20, 043510 (2013). doi:10.1063/1.4801067
H.F. Hess, Evaporative cooling of magnetically trapped and compressed spin-polarized hydrogen. Phys. Rev. B 34, 3476 (1986)
G. Andresen et al., Evaporative cooling of antiprotons to cryogenic temperatures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 013003 (2010)
G. Andresen et al., Search for trapped antihdyrogen. Phys. Lett. B 695, 95 (2011)
B.I. Deutch et al., Antihydrogen by positronium-antiproton collisions. Hyp. Int. 44(1–4), 271–286 (1989)
N. Madsen, Private Commun. (2011)
B.M. Jelenkovic et al., Sympathetically laser-cooled positrons. Nucl. Inst. Meth. B 192, 117127 (2002)
P.H. Donnan et al., A proposal for laser cooling antihydrogen atoms. J. Phys. B 46, 025302 (2013). doi:10.1088/0953-4075/46/2/025302
Acknowledgments
The author would like to thank the editors, Professors Quint and Vogel, for taking the initiative to prepare this volume and for the hard work of editing it. My many colleagues in PS200, ATHENA, and ALPHA are gratefully acknowledged for outstanding collaboration over the years; their names are to be found in the references. I would also like to thank the CERN AD and injector staff for delivering reliable beam over the years, and the members of the other AD and LEAR experiments, past and present, for creating an extremely stimulating working environment at CERN. The authors work has been supported by the Danish National Research Council (SNF, FNU), the Carlsberg Foundation, and the European Research Council.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hangst, J.S. (2014). Fundamental Physics with Antihydrogen. In: Quint, W., Vogel, M. (eds) Fundamental Physics in Particle Traps. Springer Tracts in Modern Physics, vol 256. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45201-7_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45201-7_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-45200-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-45201-7
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)