Skip to main content

Knowledge Engineering in Business Process Management

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook on Business Process Management 2

Part of the book series: International Handbooks on Information Systems ((INFOSYS))

Abstract

Business Process Management (BPM) has become a commodity nowadays. It has undergone an evolution from the initial business process re-engineering in the 1980s to a well-established management approach, which is extensively discussed in this book (See introduction chapter of Harmon on the Scope and Evolution of Business Process Management). This chapter deals with the increasingly important domain of knowledge-sensitive BPM as a current challenge imposed from semantic web, the cloud, social networks or Web 2.0 not only to provide new technologies for BPM but also trigger a cultural change of people involved. Three aspects of knowledge sensitiveness in BPM are proposed. First, BPM can be seen as a domain itself focusing on BP-frameworks identifying basic concepts such as business model, domain, regulation, or model processing (See introduction chapters by Rosemann and vom Brocke on the Six Core Elements of BPM). Second, BPM needs to be applied using a management method such as the BPMS methodology. Third, BPM needs to be executed within an environment; hence, it is deployed. BPM can be seen as a basic concept for corporate knowledge leading to knowledge-sensitive BPM. Studying the knowledge-sensitiveness two forms of interpretation are distinguished: (1) knowledge engineering (KE) focusing on machine interpretable knowledge and (2) knowledge management (KM) relating to human interpretation of knowledge. In the following, the focus lies upon KE distinguishing three viewpoints: (a) KE is established in BP-frameworks as a realization within the used meta models for those frameworks; (b) knowledge-intensive actions within the BP method – which is typically performed by business process (BP) analysts – is supported by KE techniques; (c) deployment of BPM within a typical execution environment is likely including knowledge-based applications, hence those knowledge concepts need to be reflected. KE techniques are proposed for the areas above and empirical experiences as results of research projects are described. As a conclusion an outlook on the conceptual and technical integration summarizes the chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See introduction chapter of Davenport (2014) on Process Management for Knowledge Work.

  2. 2.

    See book chapter Seidel et al. (2014) on Managing Creativity-intensive Processes.

  3. 3.

    See book chapter by Jerry Luftman (2014) on Strategic Alignment Maturity.

  4. 4.

    A system of systems (syn. hybrid computing system) is a system composed of (super-) computing resources of different architectures. They are tightly coupled, interconnected by high-speed network and are treated as a single system.

  5. 5.

    See book chapter Hammer (2014) providing insights as to what the BPM domain is about.

  6. 6.

    Davenport (2014) explores a particular aspect of knowledge in BPM, i.e. how BPM can facilitate knowledge work. As opposed to the general knowledge engineering approach presented in this chapter, Davenport presents process-oriented approaches tailored to the specific requirements of autonomous knowledge workers.

  7. 7.

    See book chapter from Becker et al. (2014) Semantic Business Process Management.

  8. 8.

    See book chapter from Lind et al. (2014) on Collaborative Process Modelling: The Intersport Case Study.

  9. 9.

    See book chapter from Kemsley (2014) Business Process Management and the Social Enterprise.

References

  • ADONIS® Community Edition. http://www.adonis-community.com. Accessed 28 July 2013

  • ADONIS®. http://www.boc-group.com. Accessed 28 July 2013

  • ADOxx. http://www.adoxx.org. Accessed 15 Nov 2012

  • AsIsKnown EC-Project. http://www.asisknown.org. Accessed 28 July 2013

  • AWA Project, Austrian National Project. http://www.boc-group.com/research. Accessed 28 July 2013

  • Bayer F (2001) Proceedings der Informatik’2001 – Wirtschaft und Wissenschaft in der Network Economy – Visionen und Wirklichkeit. In: Bauknecht K, Brauer W, Mück Th (Hrsg) Tagungsband II der GI/OCG-Jahrestagung, Universität Wien, 25–28 September 2001, pp S922–S927

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker J et al (2014) Semantic business process modelling and analysis. In: vom Brocke J, Rosemann M (eds) Handbook on business process management, vol 1, 2nd edn. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 187–218

    Google Scholar 

  • BMI Report, Bptrend. http://www.bptrends.com/. Accessed 28 July 2013

  • BPEL for People. http://download.boulder.ibm.com/ibmdl/pub/software/dw/specs/ws-bpel4people/BPEL4People_v1.pdf. Accessed 28 July 2013

  • Brusilovsky P (2003) From adaptive hypermedia to the adaptive web, University of Pittsburgh, USA. In: Szwillus G, Ziegler J (Hrsg) Mensch & computer: Interaktion in Bewegung, Teubner BG, Stuttgart, pp S21–S24

    Google Scholar 

  • Catapano A, D’Atri A, Hrgovcic V, Ionita AD, Tarabanis K (2008) LD-CAST: local development cooperation actions enabled by semantic technology. Eastern Europe e|Gov days, Prague

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport TH (2014) Process management for knowledge work. In: vom Brocke J, Rosemann M (eds) Handbook on business process management, vol 1, 2nd edn. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 17–35

    Google Scholar 

  • FIT EC-Project. http://www.boc-group.com/research. Accessed 28 July 2013

  • Foster I What is grid? In: A three point checklist. http://dlib.cs.odu.edu/WhatIsTheGrid.pdf. Accessed 15 Nov 2012

  • Gartner (2006) http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=497088. Accessed 28 July 2013

  • Hammer M (2014) What is business process management? In: vom Brocke J, Rosemann M (eds) Handbook on business process management, vol 1, 2nd edn. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 3–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Harmon P (2014) The scope and evolution of business process management. In: vom Brocke J, Rosemann M (eds) Handbook on business process management, vol 1, 2nd edn. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 37–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Junginger S, Kühn H, Strobl R, Karagiannis D (2000) Ein Geschäftsprozessmanagement-Werk zeug der nächsten Generation-ADONIS: Konzeption und Anwendungen. Wirtschaftsinformatik, Gabler Verlag, Vieweg, pp 392–401

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalfoglou Y, Schorlemmer M (2003) Ontology mapping: the state of the art. Knowl Eng Rev 18(1):1–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kappel G, Kapsammer E, Kargl H, Kramler G, Reiter T, Retschitzegger W, Schwinger W, Wimmer M (2006) On models and ontologies – a layered approach for model-based tool integration. In: Mayr HC, Breu R (eds) Modellierung 2006, 22–24 März 2006, Innsbruck, proceedings. GI 2006 LNI, pp 11–27. ISBN 3-88579-176-5

    Google Scholar 

  • Karagiannis D (1994) Die Rolle von Workflow-Management beim Re-Engineering von Geschäftsprozessen. Dv Management 3/94, pp 109–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Karagiannis D (1995) BPMS: business process management systems. SIGOIS Bull 16(1):10–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karagiannis D, Höfferer P (2006) Metamodels in action: an overview. In: Filipe J, Shishkov B, Helfert M (eds) ICSOFT 2006 – first international conference on software and data technologies: IS27-36. Insticc Press, Setúbal

    Google Scholar 

  • Karagiannis D, Telesko R (2001) Wissensmanagement: Konzepte der künstlichen Intelligenz und des Softcomputing. Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag, Munich. ISBN 3486255665

    Google Scholar 

  • Karagiannis D, Junginger S, Strobl R (1996) Introduction to business process management systems concepts. In: Scholz-Reiter B, Stickel E (eds) Business process modelling. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 81–106. ISBN 3-540-61707-8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Karagiannis D, Mylopoulos J, Schwab M (2007) Business process-based regulation compliance: the case of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. In: 15th IEEE international requirements engineering conference, India Habitat Center, New Delhi, 15–19 Oct 2007

    Google Scholar 

  • Karagiannis D, Utz W, Woitsch R, Eichner H (2008) Business process modelling for semantic service oriented infrastructure. In: Cunningham P, Cunningham M (eds) Collaboration and the knowledge economy. IOS Press, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemsley S (2014) Business process management and the social enterprise. In: vom Brocke J, Rosemann M (eds) Handbook on business process management, vol 2, 2nd edn. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 463–474

    Google Scholar 

  • Kühn H (2004) Methodenintegration in business engineering. PhD thesis, University of Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Kühn H, Bayer F, Junginger S, Karagiannis D (2003) Enterprise model integration. In: Bauknecht K, Min Tjoa A, Quirchmayer G (eds) Proceedings of the 4th international conference ec-web 2003, Dexa 2003, Prague, 2–5 September 2003, lncs 2738, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 379–392

    Google Scholar 

  • Leutgeb A, Utz W, Woitsch R, Fill H-G (2007) Adaptive processes in e-government – a field report about semantic-based approaches from the EU-project “FIT”. In: Proceedings of the international conference on enterprise information systems (ICEIS 07), Funchal, Madeira

    Google Scholar 

  • Lind M et al (2014) Collaborative process modeling and design: the intersport case study. In: vom Brocke J, Rosemann M (eds) Handbook on business process management, vol 1, 2nd edn. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 301–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Luftman J (2014) Strategic alignment maturity. In: vom Brocke J, Rosemann M (eds) Handbook on business process management, vol 2, 2nd edn. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 5–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Mak K (2005) Der Einsatz des prozessorientierten Wissensmanagementwerkzeuges PROMOTE® in der Zentraldokumentation der Landesverteidigungsakademie, Landesverteidigungsaka demie Wien

    Google Scholar 

  • Missikoff M, Proietti M, Smith F (2011) Querying semantically enriched business processes. In: Hameurlain A, Liddle SW, Schewe KD, Zhou X (eds) 22st international conference on database and expert systems applications (2011), Toulouse, 29 August–2 September 2011, LNCS 6861, Springer, pp 294–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Nissen HW, Jarke M (1999) Repository support for multi-perspective requirements engineering. Inf Syst 24(2):131–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Object Management Group (OMG), Meta Object Facility (MOF). http://www.omg.org/mof/. Accessed 28 July 2013

  • Open Model Initiative. http://www.openmodels.org. Accessed 15 Nov 2012

  • Open Model Initiative Laboratory. http://www.omilab.org. Accessed 15 Nov 2012

  • Osterwalder A, Pigneur Y, Tucci CL (2005) Clarifying business models: origins, present, and future of the concept. Comm AIS 2005(16):1–25

    Google Scholar 

  • OWL Working Group. http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/OWL_Working_Group. Accessed 28 July 2013

  • Peters RJ, Ozsu MT (1993) Reflection in a uniform behavioral object model. In: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on entity-relationship approach, Arlington, pp 34–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosemann M, vom Brocke J (2014) The six core elements of business process management. In: vom Brocke J, Rosemann M (eds) Handbook on business process management, vol 1, 2nd edn. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 105–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Schacher M, Grässle P (2006) Agile unternehmen durch business rules. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidel S et al (2014) Creativity-aware business process management: what we can learn from film and visual effects production. In: vom Brocke J, Rosemann M (eds) Handbook on business process management, vol 1, 2nd edn. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 715–739

    Google Scholar 

  • Strahringer S (1996) Metamodellierung als Instrument des Methodenvergleichs: eine Evaluierung am Beispiel objektorientierter Analysemethoden. Shaker, Aachen

    Google Scholar 

  • Telesko R, Karagiannis D, Woitsch R (2001) Knowledge management concepts and tools: the PROMOTE project. In: Gronau N, Wissensmanagement – Systeme – Anwendungen – Technologien, Proceedings of the 2nd Oldenburger Forum Wissensmanagement, Shaker Verlag, Aachen

    Google Scholar 

  • vom Brocke J (2007a) Informationssysteme für Wissensnetzwerke, HMD, Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik

    Google Scholar 

  • vom Brocke J (2007b) Service portfolio measurement. Evaluating financial performance of service-oriented business processes. Int J Web Serv Res (IJWSR) 4(2):1–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Woitsch R (2004) Process oriented knowledge management: a service-based approach. PhD thesis, University of Vienna

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Dimitris Karagiannis or Robert Woitsch .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Karagiannis, D., Woitsch, R. (2015). Knowledge Engineering in Business Process Management. In: vom Brocke, J., Rosemann, M. (eds) Handbook on Business Process Management 2. International Handbooks on Information Systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45103-4_26

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics