Skip to main content

Forest Seed Collection, Processing, and Testing

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Tropical Forestry Handbook
  • 372 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter pertains to the techniques of capturing the best genetic quality seeds a seed source can produce at the optimal time of high physiological maturity and maintaining these qualities throughout the handling processes, all at a minimum cost. Different collection and processing techniques apply to different species, seed types, situations, and purposes. Yet the collection and processing toolbox contains a number of “standard” methods for most of these groups. Records and documentation help in evaluating “best practice” for future method improvement, and it helps in linking offspring to seed source. Conditions are set for short- and long-term seed storage by their inert storability physiology. The potential storage life of seed may for some robust “orthodox” species be several decades, while no available storage conditions can maintain viability for sensitive “recalcitrant” seed. Seed testing aims at quantifying seed quality parameters such as seed weight, moisture content, purity, and germination. The methods contain a set of standard procedures for preparation and evaluation. Special types of evaluation contain, e.g., health teats and indirect methods of measuring seed viability. Information gathered through seed testing are used as a general quality documentation during seed trade and as a guide for subsequent handling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anon (1995) A guide to good climbing practice. The Arboricultural Association, Stonehouse

    Google Scholar 

  • AOSA (1983) Seed vigor testing handbook. Contribution no 32 to the handbook on seed testing. Association of Official Seed Analysts, Beltsville

    Google Scholar 

  • AOSA (2010) Tetrazolium testing handbook. Society of Commercial Seed Technologists and the Association of Official Seed Analysts, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • AOSA (2014) Rules for testing seeds. Association of Official Seed Analysts, Ithaca, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Apetorgbor MM, Turco E, Cobbinah JR, Ragazzi A (2004) Potential factors limiting viability of Milicia excelsa (Welw.) C. C. Berg seeds in plantation establishment in West Africa. Zeitschrift fur Pflanzenkrankheiten und Pflanzenschutz 111(3):238–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Berjak P, Pammenter NW (2002) Orthodox and recalcitrant seed. In: Vozzo J (ed) Tropical tree seed manual, vol 721, Agriculture Handbook. USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC, pp 137–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Berjak P, Pammenter NW (2003) Understanding and handling desiccation-sensitive seeds. In: Smith RD, Dickie JB, Linington SH, Pritchard HW, Probert RJ (eds) Seed conservation: turning science into practice. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, pp 415–430, Chapter 22

    Google Scholar 

  • Berjak P, Pammenter NW (2008) From Avicennia to Zizania: seed recalcitrance in perspective. Ann Bot 101:213–228

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bhodthipuks J, Saelim S, Pukittayacamee P (1996) Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) testing for viability of tropical forest tree seed. In: Bhodthipuks J, Pukittayacamee P, Saelim S, Wang BSP, Yu SL (eds) Rapid viability testing of tropical tree seed, vol 4, Training course proceedings no. ASEAN Forest Tree Seed Centre Project, Muak Lek, pp 11–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair DB (1995) Arborist equipment: a guide to the tools and equipment of tree maintenance and removal. International Society of Arboriculture, Champaign

    Google Scholar 

  • Boland DJ, Brooker MIH, Turnbull JW, Kleinig DA (1990) Eucalyptus seed. CSIRO, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonner FT, Vozzo JA, Elam WW, Land SB Jr (1994) Tree seed technology training course. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Forest Experiment Station, New Orleans

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole RJ, Holl KD, Keene CL, Zahawi RA (2011) Direct seeding of late-successional trees to restore tropical montane forest. For Ecol Manage 261:1590–1597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craviotto RM, Arango MR, Salinas AR, Gibbons R, Bergmann R, Montero MS (2004) A device for automated digital x-ray imaging for seed analysis. Seed Sci Technol 32(3):867–871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Critchfield WB, Little EL Jr (1966) Geographic distribution of the pines of the world. US Dept. Agric., For Service. Miscel. Publ. 991, Washington, DC

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Doust SJ, Erskine PD, Lamb D (2006) Direct seeding to restore rainforest species: microsite effects on the early establishment and growth of rainforest tree seedlings on degraded land in the wet tropics of Australia. For Ecol Manage 234:333–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis JB (1986) Quantifying seed deterioration. In: McDonald MB, Nelson CJ (eds) Physiology of seed deterioration, CSSA special publication no 11. Crop Science Society of America, Madison, pp 101–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Enescu V (1991) The tetrazolium test of viability. In: Gordon AG, Gosling P, Wang BSP (eds) Tree and shrub seed handbook. International Seed Testing Association, Zurich, Chap 9

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2006) Quality declared seed systems. FAO plant production and protection Paper 185, FAO, Rome, 242 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO, DFSC, IPGRI (2001) Forest genetic resources conservation and management. Vol. 2: In managed natural forests and protected areas (in situ). International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO, DFSC, IPGRI (2004a) Forest genetic resources conservation and management. Vol. 1: Overview, concepts and some systematic approaches. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO, DFSC, IPGRI (2004b) Forest genetic resources conservation and management. Vol. 3: In plantations and genebanks (ex situ). International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Finch-Savage WE, Blake PS (1994) Indeterminate development in desiccation sensitive seeds of Quercus robur L. Seed Sci Res 4:127–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunn B (2001) Australian tree seed centre operations manual. Australian Tree Seed Centre, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunn B, Agiwa A, Bosimbi D, Brammall B, Jarua L, Uwamariya A (2004) Seed handling and propagation of Papua New Guinea’s tree species. CSIRO Forestry and Forest Products, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Haines R, Nikles G (1987) Seed production in Araucaria cunninghamii – the influence of biological features of the species. Aust For 50(4):224–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huth JR, Haines R (1996) The effects of de-winging seeds of hoop pines (Araucaria Cunninghamii) on seed viability and longevity. In: Yapa AC (ed.) Recent Advances in tropical tree seed technology and planting stock production (Yapa, AC ed.). Proc. Intl. Symp. ASEAN Forest Seed Centre, Muak Lek/Saraburi, pp 45–50

    Google Scholar 

  • ISTA (1986) ISTA handbook on seed sampling. International Seed Testing Association, Zurich

    Google Scholar 

  • ISTA (2006) International rules for seed testing. International seed testing association, Zurich

    Google Scholar 

  • Karrfalt RP (2008) Seed harvesting and conditioning. Chapter 3 in. USDA. The woody plant seed manual. Agriculture handbook 727. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington, DC, pp 57–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruse M (2004) ISTA handbook on seed sampling. International Seed Testing Association, Zurich

    Google Scholar 

  • Laedem CL (1984) Quick tests for tree seed viability. British Columbia Ministry of Forests and Lands Research Branch, Victoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Linington SH (2003) The design of seed banks. In: Smith RD, Dickie JB, Linington SH, Pritchard HW, Probert RJ (eds) Seed conservation – turning science into practice. The millennium seed bank project. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, pp 593–636

    Google Scholar 

  • Masilamani P, Vadivalu KK (1993) Effect of seed extraction methods on germination and vigour of honey mesquite. Madras Agric J 84(8):512–514

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurer KD, Bohrer G, Medvigy D, Wright SJ (2013) The timing of abscission affects dispersal distance in a wind-dispersed tropical tree. Funct Ecol 27(1):208–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLemore BF, Chappell TW (1973) Mechanical shaking for cones harmless to Slash Pines. J For 71(2):96–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Mineau A (1973) A new machine for collection off the ground; the beech-mast ‘vacuum-cleaner. Bulletin Technique, Office National de Foret, France 5:21–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohanan C, Sharma JK (1991) Seed pathology of forest tree species in India – present status, practical problems and future prospects. Commonw For Rev 70:133–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore RP (1985) Handbook on tetrazolium testing. International Seed Testing Association, Zurich

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison RH (1999) Sampling in seed testing. Phytopathology 89:1084–1087

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ogunnika CB, Kadeba O (1993) Effect of various methods of extracting on germination of Gmelina arborea seeds/fruits. J Trop For Sci 5(4):473–478

    Google Scholar 

  • Pammenter NW, Berjak P (1999) A review of recalcitrant seed physiology in relation to desiccation tolerance mechanisms. Seed Sci Res 9:13–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson B, Vaillancourt RE, Potts BM (2001) Eucalypt seed collectors: beware of sampling seedlots from low in the canopy. Aust For 64:139–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pazos GE, David F, Greene DF, Katul G, Bertiller MB, Soon MB (2013) Seed dispersal by wind: towards a conceptual framework of seed abscission and its contribution to long-distance dispersal. J Ecol 101:889–904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peran R, Pammenter NW, Naiker J, Berjak P (2004) The influence of rehydration technique on the response of recalcitrant seed embryos to desiccation. Seed Sci Res 14:179–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poulsen KM, Parratt MJ, Gosling PG (eds) (1998) ISTA tropical and sub-tropical tree and shrub seed handbook. International Seed Testing Association, Zurich

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley JD, Craft IW, Rimmer DL, Smith RS (2004) Restoration of magnesian limestone grassland: optimizing the time for seed collection by vacuum harvesting. Restor Ecol 12(3):311–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts EH (1973) Predicting storage life of seeds. Seed Sci Technol 1:499–514

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacandé M, Jøker D, Dulloo ME, Thomsen KA (2004) Comparative storage biology of tropical tree seeds. IPGRI, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Saelim S, Pukittayacamee P, Bhodthpuks J, Wang BSP (1996) X-radiography testing for viability of tropical forest seed. In: Bhodthipuks J, Pukittayacamee P, Saelim S, Wang BSP, Yu SL (eds) Rapid viability testing of tropical tree seed, vol 4, Training course proceedings no. ASEAN Forest Tree Seed Centre Project, Muak Lek, pp 17–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Sary H, Yameogo CS, Stubsgaard F (1993) The CO2 method to control insect infestation in tree seed, Technical note no 42. Danida Forest Seed Centre, Humlebaek

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt L (2000) Guide to handling of tropical and subtropical forest seed. Danida Forest Seed Centre, Humlebaek

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt L (2008) A review of direct sowing versus planting in tropical afforestation and land rehabilitation, Development and environment, nr. 10. Forest & Landscape Denmark, Copenhagen University, Hørsholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Silen R, Osterhaus C (1979) Reduction of genetic base by sizing of bulked Douglas-fir seed lots. Tree Planters Notes 30(1):24–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Simak M (1991) Testing of forest tree and shrub seeds by X-radiography. In: Gordon AG, Gosling P, Wang BSP (eds) Tree and shrub seed handbook. International Seed Testing Association, Zurich, Chap 14

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen FC, Campbell RK (1993) Seed weight – seedling size correlation in coastal Douglas-fir: genetic and environmental components. Can J For Res 23:275–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srimathi P, Ramadane T, Malarkodi K, Natarajan K (2003) Seed extraction in Jamun (Syzygium cumini Skeels). Progress Hortic 35(2):221–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland JR, Diekmann M, Berjak P (2002) Forest seed health, IPGRI technical bulletin no. 6. IPGRI, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • TeKrony DM (2005) Accelerated aging test: principles and procedures. Seed Technol 27(1):135–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters C, Pammenter NW, Berjak P, Crane J (2001) Desiccation damage, accelerated ageing and respiration in desiccation tolerant and sensitive seeds. Seed Sci Res 11:135–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu SL, Wang BSP (1996) Tetrazolium testing for viability of tree seed. In: Bhodthipuks J, Pukittayacamee P, Saelim S, Wang BSP, Yu SL (eds) Rapid viability testing of tropical tree seed, Training course proceedings no 4. ASEAN Forest Tree Seed Centre Project, Muak Lek, pp 33–58

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lars Schmidt .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this entry

Cite this entry

Schmidt, L. (2015). Forest Seed Collection, Processing, and Testing. In: Köhl, M., Pancel, L. (eds) Tropical Forestry Handbook. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41554-8_225-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41554-8_225-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-41554-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Biomedicine and Life SciencesReference Module Biomedical and Life Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics