Abstract
Information and communication technologies provide firms with new opportunities to co-create innovations with their customers. The resulting trend towards “open innovation” has revitalized firm’s interest in systematically tapping into external innovation sources. Whereas the first open innovation cases typically dealt with product innovation, latest developments show that also intangible service innovation or corporate strategies can be co-developed with users, customers, or employees. As internet technologies are also increasingly pervasive in the public sector, virtual citizen co-creation systems also constitute an important but unexplored research area within the public administration research. This is especially relevant since real case examples in the public sector underline the need for more openness in governmental decision making. To tackle the research question, how an online co-creating approach may be designed to develop a political strategy together with experts and citizens, we conducted a 22-month research project together with the state chancellery of North Rheine Westphalia. A virtual co-creation system to rework an existing political strategy together with experts and citizens was created, implemented and evaluated. During the 3 month live-phase the platform attracted more than 60,000 visitors and about 270 active and registered members. Furthermore, 250 contributions, uploads of 236 additional documents and studies, about 500 evaluations, and over 1,050 written messages were counted. Our results show how intangible public innovations, which are tied to social welfare, public ethics, and legitimization, can be systematically co-created. These insights add relevant theoretical contributions to the research fields of service innovation, open innovation, and most importantly to the research community of public administration. From a practical and managerial point of view, our insights are of practical relevance for system designers and managers within public administration, politicians, and consulting agencies which intend to virtually integrate citizens, experts as well as politicians into co-creation processes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bach, S., & Della Rocca, G. (2000). The management strategies of public service employers in Europe. Industrial Relations Journal, 31(2), 82–96.
Baskerville, R.L. & Wood-Harper, A. (1996). A critical perspective on action research as a method for information systems research. Journal of Information Technology, 11(3), 235–246.
Bernoff, J., & Li, C. (2008). Harnessing the power of the oh-so-social web. MIT Sloan Management Review, 49(3), 36.
Butler, T., Feller, J., Pope, A., Emerson, B., & Murphy, C. (2000). Designing a core IT artefact for knowledge management systems using participatory action research in a government and a non-government organization. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 17(4), 249–267.
Checkland, P., & Holwell, S. (2007). Action research: Its nature and validity. In N. Kock (Ed.), Information systems action research: An applied view of emerging concepts and methods (pp. 3–17). Boston: Springer.
Chesbrough, H. (2006). Open innovation: A new paradigm for understanding industrial innovation. In H.W. Chesbrough, J. West, & W. Vanhaverbeke (Eds.), Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm (pp. 1–14). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chesbrough, H., & Appleyard, M. (2007). Open innovation and strategy. California Management Review, 50(1), 57.
Chiaroni, D., Chiesa, V., & Frattini, F. (2008). Patterns of collaboration along the bio-pharmaceutical innovation process. Journal of Business Chemistry, 5(1), 7–22.
Dahlander, L., & Gann, D. (2010). How open is innovation? Research Policy, 39(6), 699–709.
Filzmaier, P. (2007). Ein unaufhaltbarer Sinkflug? Wahlbeteiligung in Österreich und anderswo. Informationen zur Politischen Bildung, 27, 44–49.
Füller, J. (2010). Refining virtual co-creation from a consumer perspective. California Management Review, 52(2), 98–122.
Füller, J., & Matzler, K. (2007). Virtual product experience and customer participation—A chance for customer-centred, really new products. Technovation, 27(6–7), 378–387.
Füller, J., Bartl, M., Ernst, H., & Mühlbacher, H. (2004). Community based innovation: A method to utilize the innovative potential of online communities. Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 1–10.
Füller, J., Mühlbacher, H., Matzler, K., & Jawecki, G. (2009). Consumer empowerment through Internet-based co-creation. Journal of Management Information Systems, 26(3), 71–102.
Füller, J., Hutter, K., & Faullant, R. (2011). Why co-creation experience matters? Creative experience and its impact on the quantity and quality of creative contributions. R&D Management, 41(3), 259–273.
Gassmann, O., Enkel, E., & Chesbrough, H. (2010). The future of open innovation. R&D Management, 40(3), 213–221.
Gebauer, J., Füller, J., & Pezzei, R. (2012). The dark and the bright side of co-creation: Triggers of member behavior in online innovation communities. Journal of Business Research. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296312002500. Accessed May 10, 2013.
Giles, W. G. (1991). Making strategy work. Long Range Planning, 24(5), 75–91.
Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2009). Users of the world unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59–68.
Kindon, S.L., Pain, R., & Kesby, M. (2007). Participatory action research approaches and methods: Connecting people, participation and place. London: Routledge.
Koch, G. & Rapp, M. (2012). Open Government Platforms in Municipality Areas: Identifying elemental design principles. In: D. Hilgers, R. Schauer, & N. Thom (Eds.), Public Management im Paradigmenwechsel- Staat und Verwaltung im Spannungsfeld von New Public Management, Open Government und bürokratischer Restauration (pp. 289–303). Linz.
Koch, G., Rapp, M., & Füller, J. (2012). Online Bürgerbeteiligung in Deutschland—Ansätze, Best Practices und relevante Erfolgsfaktoren. In T. Prorok & B. Krabina (Eds.), Offene Stadt: Wie BürgerInnenbeteiligung, BürgerInnenservice und soziale Medien Politik und Verwaltung verändern. Wien: NWV.
Koch, G., Hutter, K., Decarli, P., Hilgers, D., & Füller, J. (2013). Identifying participants’ roles in open government platforms and its impact on community growth. Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS).
Lee, S. M., Hwang, T., & Choi, D. (2011). Open innovation in the public sector of leading countries. Management Decision, 50(1), 9–9.
Li, C., & Bernoff, J. (2011). Groundswell: Winning in a world transformed by social technologies. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Nambisan, S., & Sawhney, M. (2007). A buyer’s guide to the innovation bazaar. Harvard Business Review, 85(6), 109–118.
Nelson, R. & Sampat, B. (2001). Making sense of institutions as a factor shaping economic performance. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 44(1), 31–54.
Nijssen, E.J., Hillebrand, B., Vermeulen, P., & Kemp, R. (2006). Exploring product and service innovation similarities and differences. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 23(3), 241–251.
Obama, B. (2009). Transparency and open government. http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/TransparencyandOpenGovernment/.
Piller, F. T., & Walcher, D. (2006). Toolkits for idea competitions: A novel method to integrate users in new product development. R & D Management, 36(3), 307–318.
Rowe, G., & Frewer, L. J. (2004). Evaluating public-participation exercises: A research agenda. Science, Technology and Human Values, 29(4), 512.
Sawhney, M. & Prandelli, E., (2000). Communities of creation: Managing distributed innovation in turbulent markets. California Management Review, 42(4), 24–54.
Sterling, J. (2003). Translating strategy into effective implementation: Dispelling the myths and highlighting what works. Strategy & Leadership, 31(3), 27–34.
Stieger, D., Matzler, K., Chatterjee, S., & Ladstaetter-Fussenegger, F. (2012). Democratizing strategy: How crowdsourcing can be used for strategy dialogues. California Management Review, 54(4), 44–68.
Tether, B. S., & Tajar, A. (2008). The organizational-cooperation mode of innovation and its prominence amongst European service firms. Research Policy, 37, 720–739.
Wadsworth, Y. (1998). What’s participatory action research. Action Research International.
Whittington, R., Cailluet, L., & Akis-Douglas, B. (2011). Opening strategy: Evolution of a precarious profession. British Journal of Management, 22(3), 531–544.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Koch, G., Rapp, M., Kröger, N. (2013). Harnessing the Innovation Potential of Citizens: How Open Innovation Can be Used to Co-develop Political Strategies. In: Pfeffermann, N., Minshall, T., Mortara, L. (eds) Strategy and Communication for Innovation. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41479-4_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41479-4_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-41478-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-41479-4
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)