Abstract
This article will address possible conflicts between the UN Drug Conventions and Human Rights treaties, specifically in regard to countries committing human rights violations in applying drug laws. Considering that human rights are at the core of the UN System and, together with development, and peace and security, represent one of the three pillars of the United Nations enshrined in the UN Charter, it is preposterous that drug policies applied by UN Members violate the individual and social rights provided for in many international instruments that are assumed to be binding to state’s interventions. Nevertheless, there are many examples of human rights violations, such as the death penalty for drug offenses, inhumane treatment imposed on drug addicts, violations of individual guarantees in criminal cases involving drugs, and the prohibition of substances such as the coca leaf, traditionally consumed in the Andes in South America, that will be examined in this chapter.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
There are, as of November 2011, 183 states that are parties to the Convention on Psychotropic Substances of 1971, according to the INCB. A total of 12 states have yet to become parties to that convention: three of them in Africa (Equatorial Guinea, Liberia, and South Sudan), one in the Americas (Haiti), one in Asia (Timor-Leste), and seven in Oceania (Cook Islands, Kiribati, Nauru, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Tuvalu and Vanuatu).
- 2.
General Assembly resolution 2857 (XXVI) of December 20, 1971: Safeguards guaranteeing the protection of the rights of those facing the death penalty (Economic and Social Council resolution 1984/50 of May 25, 1984). Declaration on the Protection of All Persons from Being Subjected to Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (General Assembly Resolution 3452 (XXX) of 9 December 1975). See also the Compendium of United Nations Standards and Norms in Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice, ST/CSDHA/16.
- 3.
“High Commissioner calls for focus on human rights and harm reduction in international drug policy,” press release, United Nations 2009; Report of the UN Secretary General, capital punishment and implementation of the safeguards guaranteeing protection of rights of those facing the death penalty, ECOSOC, 18.12.09.
References
Alston, P. (2007). Report of the Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial summary or arbitrary executions. A/HRC/4/20. New York, NY: United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved March 10, 2013 from http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G07/105/00/PDF/G0710500.pdf?OpenElement.
Barrett, D. (2010). Security, development and human rights: Normative, legal and policy challenges for the international drug control system. International Journal of Drug Policy, 21(2), 140–144.
Bassiouni, C., & Thony, J. (1998). The international drug control system. In C. Bassiouni (Ed.), International criminal law (pp. 905–948). Ardsley, NY: Transnational Publishers.
Bewley-Taylor, D., Hallam, C., & Allen, R. (2009). The incarceration of drug offenders: An overview. The Beckley Foundation Drug Policy Programme, Report Sixteen. London: Kings College International Centre for Prison Studies. Retrieved March 10, 2013 from http://www.beckleyfoundation.org/pdf/BF_Report_16.pdf.
Bewley-Taylor, D., & Jelsma, M. (2012). UN drug control conventions: The limits of latitude. Series on legislative reform of drug policies, no. 18. Amsterdam: Transnational Institute. Retrieved March 10, 2013 from http://www.undrugcontrol.info/images/stories/documents/dlr18.pdf.
Bewley-Taylor, D., Trace, M., & Stevens, A. (2005). Incarceration of drug offenders: Costs and impacts. The Beckley Foundation Drug Policy Programme Briefing Paper Seven. London: The Beckley Foundation. Retrieved March 10, 2013 from http://www.iprt.ie/files/incarceration_of_drug_users.pdf.
Blickerman, T. (2008). Human rights and drug control. Amsterdam: Transnational Institute. Retrieved March 10, 2013 from http://www.druglawreform.info/en/weblog/item/2007.
Boister, N. (2001). Penal aspects of the UN drug conventions. London: Kluwer Law International.
Cançado Trindade, A. A. (2009). Jus cogens: The determination and the gradual expansion of its material content in contemporary international case law. In 35 Curso de Derecho Internacional Organizado por el Comité Jurídico Interamericano – OAS (pp. 3–29). Washington, DC: Secretary General of OAS.
Chernicharo, L. P., & Boiteux Rodrigues, L. (2012). Da folha de coca à cocaína: Os direitos humanos e o impacto das políticas internacionais de drogas nas populações nativas da Bolívia (pp. 7022–7052). Anais do XXI Congresso Nacional do CONPEDI. Uberlândia, Brazil: CONPEDI.
Chiu, J. V., & Burris, S. C. (2012). Punitive drug law and the risk environment for injecting drug users: Understanding the connections. Social Science Research Network. Retrieved March 10, 2013 from: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2102841 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2102841.
Crocket, A. (2010). The function and relevance of the commission in narcotic drugs in the pursuit of humane drug policy (or the ramblings of a bewildered diplomat). International Journal on Human Rights and Drug Policy, 1, 83–90.
European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction. (2005). Alternatives to imprisonment: Targeting offending problem drug users in the EU [Annual report]. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Available at http://www.emcdda.europa.eu/attachements.cfm/att_37288_EN_sel2005_2-en.pdf.
Feeney, K., & Labate, B. C. (2014). The expansion of Brazilian ayahuasca religions: Law, culture and locality (this volume).
Gallahue, P., Gunawan, R., Rahman, F., El Mufti, K., U Din, N., & Felten, R. (2012). The death penalty for drugs: Global overview tipping the scales for abolition. London: International Harm Reduction Association. Retrieved March 10, 2013 from www.ihra.net/files/2012/11/13/Death_penalty_2012_Tipping_the_Scales_Web.pdf.
Grover, A. (2010). Report of the Special Rapporteur on the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health. A/65/255. New York: United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved from http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/hrcouncil/docs/14session/A.HRC.14.20.pdf, http://daccess-ods.un.org/TMP/7433236.83738709.html.
Human Rights Watch. (2011). The rehab archipelago: Forced labor and other abuses in drug detention centers in Southern Vietnam. New York, NY: Human Rights Watch. Retrieved March 10, 2013 from http://www.hrw.org/reports/2011/09/07/rehab-archipelago.
Inter-American Court of Human Rights. (2005). Raxcacó-Reyes v. Guatemala Case. Retrieved March, 10, 2013 from http://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_133_ing.pdf.
International Harm Reduction Association (IHRA). (2008). Thematic briefings on human rights and drug policy. Blog: Harm Reduction International. Retrieved March 10, 2013 from http://www.ihra.net/contents/804.
International Narcotics Board (INCB). (2010). Report on the availability of internationally controlled drugs: Ensuring adequate access for medical and scientific purposes. Supplementary to the 2010 Annual Report. Vienna: International Narcotics Control Board. Retrieved March 10, 2013 from http://www.unodc.org/documents/southerncone/noticias/2011/03-marco/Jife/Report_of_the_Board_on_the_availability_of_controlled_substances.pdf.
International Narcotics Board (INCB). (2012). Report of the International Narcotics Control Board. Vienna: International Narcotics Control Board. Retrieved March 10, 2013 from https://www.incb.org/documents/Publications/AnnualReports/AR2011/AR_2011_English.pdf.
Metaal, P. (2014). Coca in debate (this volume).
Metaal, P., & Youngers, C. (2011). Systems overload: Drug laws and prisons in Latin America. Amsterdam: Transnational Institute.
Organization of American States. (1969). American Convention on Human Rights. Retrieved March 10, 2013 from http://www.oas.org/dil/treaties_B-32_American_Convention_on_Human_Rights.htm.
Sousa Santos, B. (2002). Towards a multicultural conception of human rights. In B. Hernandes-Tryol (Ed.), Moral imperialism: A critical anthology (pp. 39–60). New York, NY: New York University Press.
Transnational Institute. (2012). Fact sheet: Coca leaf and drugs conventions. Amsterdam: Transnational Institute. Retrieved March 10, 2013 from http://www.tni.org/briefing/fact-sheet-coca-leaf-and-un-drugs-conventions.
United Nations. (1945). Charter of the United Nations. New York, NY: United Nations. Retrieved March 10, 2013 from http://www.un.org/en/documents/charter/.
United Nations. (1961). Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs. New York, NY: United Nations. Retrieved March 10, 2013 from http://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY &mtdsg_no=VI-15&chapter=6&lang=en.
United Nations. (1966). International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). United Nations Treaty Series, 999(1-14668). Retrieved March 10, 2013 from http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/pdfid/3ae6b3aa0.pdf.
United Nations. (1973). Commentary on the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, 1961. New York, NY: United Nations.
United Nations. (1975). Declaration on the Protection of All Persons from being subjected to Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. General Assembly Resolution 3452 (XXX) of 9 December 1975. New York: United Nations.
United Nations. (1982). General Assembly Resolution 37/194: Principles of medical ethics. New York, NY: United Nations.
United Nations. (1984). General Assembly resolution 2857 (XXVI) of December 20, 1971: Safeguards guaranteeing the protection of the rights of those facing the death penalty. Economic and Social Council resolution 1984/50 of 25 May 1984. New York: United Nations.
United Nations. (1988). Commentary on the United Nations Convention against Illicit Trafficking in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances 1988. New York, NY: United Nations.
United Nations. (2009, March 10). High Commissioner calls for focus on human rights and harm reduction in international drug policy [Press release]. New York, NY: United Nations. Retrieved March 10, 2013 from http://www.unhchr.ch/huricane/huricane.nsf/0/3A5B668A4EE1BBC2C12575750055262E?opendocument.
United Nations Economic and Social Council. (2009). Resolution E/2009/L.23 adopted by the Council on 24 July 2009. New York, NY: United Nations.
United Nations Economic and Social Council. (2010). Commission on Narcotic Drugs. Resolution 53/4. Promoting adequate availability of internationally controlled licit drugs for medical and scientific purposes while preventing their diversion and abuse. E/CN.7/2010/L.6/Rev.1. New York, NY: United Nations. Retrieved March 10, 2013 from http://www.unodc.org/documents/commissions/CND-Res-2000-until-present/CND53_4e.pdf.
United Nations Economic and Social Council. (2011). Commission on Narcotic Drugs. Resolution 54/6. Promoting adequate availability of internationally controlled narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances for medical and scientific purposes while preventing their diversion and abuse. New York, NY: United Nations. Retrieved March 10, 2013 from http://www.unodc.org/documents/commissions/CND-Res-2011to2019/CND54_6e1.pdf.
United Nations Economic and Social Council. (2012). Commission on Narcotic Drugs Resolution 55/2012. New York, NY: United Nations. Retrieved March 10, 2013 from http://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/commissions/CND/09-resolutions.html.
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). (2007). Handbook of basic principles and promising practices on alternatives to imprisonment. Vienna: United Nationals Office on Drugs and Crime. Retrieved March 10, 2013 from http://www.unodc.org/pdf/criminal_justice/07-80478_ebook.pdf.
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). (2009). Political declaration and plan of action on international cooperation towards an integrated and balanced strategy to counter the world drug problem: High-level segment commission on narcotic drugs, Vienna 11–12 March 2009. New York, NY: United Nations. Retrieved March 10, 2013 from http://www.unodc.org/documents/commissions/CND-Uploads/CND-52-RelatedFiles/V0984963-English.pdf.
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). (2010). From coercion to cohesion: Treating drug dependence through health care, not punishment [Discussion paper]. Vienna: United Nationals Office on Drugs and Crime. Retrieved March 10, 2013 from http://www.unodc.org/docs/treatment/Coercion_Ebook.pdf.
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). (2011a). Ensuring availability of controlled medications for the relief of pain and preventing diversion and abuse [Discussion paper]. Note by the Secretariat, E/CN.7/2011/CRP.3. Vienna: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. Available at http://www.unodc.org/docs/treatment/Pain/Ensuring_availability_of_controlled_medications_FINAL_15_March_CND_version.pdf.
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). (2011b). Drug control, crime prevention and criminal justice: A human rights perspective. Note by the Executive Director, E/CN.7/2010/CRP.6, 201. Vienna: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. Retrieved March 10, 2013 from https://www.unodc.org/documents/commissions/CND-Uploads/CND-53-RelatedFiles/ECN72010_CRP6eV1051605.pdf.
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime/World Health Organization (UNODC/WHO). (2009). Principles of Drug Dependence Treatment [Discussion paper]. Retrieved March 10, 2013 from http://www.unodc.org/documents/drug-treatment/UNODC-WHO-Principles-of-Drug-Dependence-Treatment-March08.pdf.
Walsh, C. (2014). Beyond religious freedom: Psychedelics and cognitive liberty (this volume).
World Health Organization/United Nations Office On Drugs and Crime/UNAIDS (WHO/UNODC/UNAIDS). (2009). Technical guide for countries to set targets for universal access to HIV prevention, treatment and care for injecting drug users. Geneva: World Health Organization. Retrieved March 10, 2013 from https://www.unodc.org/documents/hiv-aids/idu_target_setting_guide.pdf.
World Medical Association (WMA). (2006). International code of medical ethics. Pilanesburg, South Africa: WMA General Assembly. Retrieved March 10, 2013 from http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/c8/index.html.pdf?print-media-type&footer-right=[page]/[toPage].
World Health Organization (WHO). (2011). Ensuring balance in national policies on controlled substances: Guidance for availability and accessibility of controlled medicines. Geneva: World Health Organization. Retrieved March 10, 2013 from http://www.who.int/medicines/areas/quality_safety/GLs_Ens_Balance_NOCP_Col_EN_sanend.pdf.
Zaffaroni, E. R. (1982). Politica criminal Latinoamericana. Buenos Aires: Hammurabi.
Zizek, S. (2007). In defense of lost causes. New York, NY: Verso.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Boiteux, L., Chernicharo, L.P., Alves, C.S. (2014). Human Rights and Drug Conventions: Searching for Humanitarian Reason in Drug Laws. In: Labate, B., Cavnar, C. (eds) Prohibition, Religious Freedom, and Human Rights: Regulating Traditional Drug Use. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40957-8_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40957-8_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-40956-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-40957-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawLaw and Criminology (R0)