Skip to main content

Bringing Order to Special Cases of Klee’s Measure Problem

  • Conference paper
Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science 2013 (MFCS 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 8087))

Abstract

Klee’s Measure Problem (KMP) asks for the volume of the union of n axis-aligned boxes in ℝd. Omitting logarithmic factors, the best algorithm has runtime \(\mathcal{O}^*(n^{d/2})\) [Overmars,Yap’91]. There are faster algorithms known for several special cases: Cube-KMP (where all boxes are cubes), Unitcube-KMP (where all boxes are cubes of equal side length), Hypervolume (where all boxes share a vertex), and k -Grounded (where the projection onto the first k dimensions is a Hypervolume instance).

In this paper we bring some order to these special cases by providing reductions among them. In addition to the trivial inclusions, we establish Hypervolume as the easiest of these special cases, and show that the runtimes of Unitcube-KMP and Cube-KMP are polynomially related. More importantly, we show that any algorithm for one of the special cases with runtime T(n,d) implies an algorithm for the general case with runtime T(n,2d), yielding the first non-trivial relation between KMP and its special cases. This allows to transfer W[1]-hardness of KMP to all special cases, proving that no n o(d) algorithm exists for any of the special cases assuming the Exponential Time Hypothesis. Furthermore, assuming that there is no improved algorithm for the general case of KMP (no algorithm with runtime \(\mathcal{O}(n^{d/2 - \epsilon})\)) this reduction shows that there is no algorithm with runtime \(\mathcal{O}(n^{\lfloor d/2 \rfloor /2 - \epsilon})\) for any of the special cases. Under the same assumption we show a tight lower bound for a recent algorithm for 2-Grounded[Yıldız,Suri’12].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agarwal, P.K.: An improved algorithm for computing the volume of the union of cubes. In: Proc. 2010 Annual Symposium on Computational Geometry (SoCG 2010), pp. 230–239. ACM, New York (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Bentley, J.L.: Algorithms for Klee’s rectangle problems. Department of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University (1977) (unpublished notes)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Beume, N., Naujoks, B., Emmerich, M.T.M.: SMS-EMOA: Multiobjective selection based on dominated hypervolume. European Journal of Operational Research 181, 1653–1669 (2007)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Beume, N., Fonseca, C.M., López-Ibáñez, M., Paquete, L., Vahrenhold, J.: On the complexity of computing the hypervolume indicator. IEEE Trans. Evolutionary Computation 13, 1075–1082 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Boissonnat, J.-D., Sharir, M., Tagansky, B., Yvinec, M.: Voronoi diagrams in higher dimensions under certain polyhedral distance functions. Discrete & Computational Geometry 19, 485–519 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Bringmann, K.: An improved algorithm for Klee’s measure problem on fat boxes. Computational Geometry: Theory and Applications 45, 225–233 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Bringmann, K.: Bringing order to special cases of Klee’s measure problem. CoRR, abs/1301.7154 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bringmann, K., Friedrich, T.: Approximating the least hypervolume contributor: NP-hard in general, but fast in practice. Theoretical Computer Science 425, 104–116 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Chan, T.M.: Semi-online maintenance of geometric optima and measures. SIAM J. Comput. 32, 700–716 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Chan, T.M.: A (slightly) faster algorithm for Klee’s measure problem. Computational Geometry: Theory and Applications 43, 243–250 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Fredman, M.L., Weide, B.W.: On the complexity of computing the measure of ∪ [a i , b i ]. Commun. ACM 21, 540–544 (1978)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Guerreiro, A.P., Fonseca, C.M., Emmerich, M.T.M.: A fast dimension-sweep algorithm for the hypervolume indicator in four dimensions. In: Proc. 24th Canadian Conference on Computational Geometry (CCCG 2012), pp. 77–82 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Igel, C., Hansen, N., Roth, S.: Covariance matrix adaptation for multi-objective optimization. Evolutionary Computation 15, 1–28 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kaplan, H., Rubin, N., Sharir, M., Verbin, E.: Counting colors in boxes. In: Proc. 18th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA 2007), pp. 785–794 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Klee, V.: Can the measure of ∪ [a i , b i ] be computed in less than O(n logn) steps? American Mathematical Monthly 84, 284–285 (1977)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Lokshtanov, D., Marx, D., Saurabh, S.: Lower bounds based on the exponential time hypothesis, The Complexity Column by V. Arvind. Bulletin of the EATCS 105, 41–72 (2011)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Overmars, M.H., Yap, C.-K.: New upper bounds in Klee’s measure problem. SIAM J. Comput. 20, 1034–1045 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. van Leeuwen, J., Wood, D.: The measure problem for rectangular ranges in d-space. J. Algorithms 2, 282–300 (1981)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Yıldız, H., Suri, S.: On Klee’s measure problem for grounded boxes. In: Proc. 2012 Annual Symposuim on Computational Geometry (SoCG 2012), pp. 111–120. ACM, New York (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zitzler, E., Künzli, S.: Indicator-based selection in multiobjective search. In: Yao, X., et al. (eds.) PPSN 2004. LNCS, vol. 3242, pp. 832–842. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Zitzler, E., Thiele, L.: Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: A comparative case study and the strength Pareto approach. IEEE Trans. Evolutionary Computation 3, 257–271 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bringmann, K. (2013). Bringing Order to Special Cases of Klee’s Measure Problem. In: Chatterjee, K., Sgall, J. (eds) Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science 2013. MFCS 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8087. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40313-2_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40313-2_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-40312-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-40313-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics