Abstract
Reasoning about preferences is a fundamental component of rationality, and therefore central in AI and computational social choice. Most logic-based frameworks for representing and reasoning about preferences assume that preferences are arbitrarily given, typically as a ranking of a set of alternatives or using utilities, with little concern about how preferences are formed or where they come from. Recent work in rational choice theory, however, has devoted attention to giving more internal structure to the notion of rationality, focusing more on the faculties of individual agents, such as their mood, mindset, and motivating reasons. In this paper we develop a modal logic for reasoning about preferences that depend on a set of motivationally salient properties, based on recent work on reasons behind preferences by Dietrich and List. The main result is that we show how the problem of reasoning in this logic can be translated to reasoning in a standard modal logic (KT with universal modality), and consequently that reasoning systems and algorithms developed for modal logic (with universal modality) can be employed for reasoning about reason-based preferences.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Barone, J.E.: Comparing apples and oranges: a randomised prospective study. BMJ 321(7276), 1569–1570 (2000)
Blackburn, P., de Rijke, M., Venema, Y.: Modal Logic. Cambridge Tracts in Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 53. Cambridge University Press (2001)
Bonzon, E., Lagasquie-Schiex, M.-C., Lang, J.: Compact preference representation for boolean games. In: Yang, Q., Webb, G. (eds.) PRICAI 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4099, pp. 41–50. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Dietrich, F., List, C.: A reason-based theory of rational choice. Mpra paper, University Library of Munich, Germany (2011)
Dietrich, F., List, C.: Where do preferences come from? Mpra paper, University Library of Munich, Germany (2011)
Dietrich, F., List, C.: Mentalism versus behaviourism in economics: a philosophy-of-science perspective. Mpra paper, University Library of Munich, Germany (2012)
de Jongh, D., Liu, F.: Preference, priorities and belief. In: Grne-Yanoff, T., Ove Hansson, S. (eds.) Preference Change. Theory and Decision Library, vol. 42, pp. 85–107. Springer Netherlands (2009)
Lang, J.: Logical preference representation and combinatorial vote. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 42, 2004 (2002)
Liu, F.: Reasoning about Preference Dynamics. In: Synthese Library, Studies in Epistemology, Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science. Springer London, Limited (2011)
Osherson, D., Weinstein, S.: Preference based on reasons. The Review of Symbolic Logic 5(01), 122–147 (2012)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Pedersen, T., Dyrkolbotn, S., Ågotnes, T. (2013). Reasonably Rational: Reasoning about Reasons Behind Preferences Using Modal Logic. In: Chesñevar, C.I., Onaindia, E., Ossowski, S., Vouros, G. (eds) Agreement Technologies. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8068. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39860-5_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39860-5_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-39859-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-39860-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)