Skip to main content

Online Checkpointing with Improved Worst-Case Guarantees

  • Conference paper
Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 7965))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In the online checkpointing problem, the task is to continuously maintain a set of k checkpoints that allow to rewind an ongoing computation faster than by a full restart. The only operation allowed is to replace an old checkpoint by the current state. Our aim are checkpoint placement strategies that minimize rewinding cost, i.e., such that at all times T when requested to rewind to some time t ≤ T the number of computation steps that need to be redone to get to t from a checkpoint before t is as small as possible. In particular, we want that the closest checkpoint earlier than t is not further away from t than q k times the ideal distance T / (k + 1), where q k is a small constant.

Improving over earlier work showing 1 + 1/k ≤ q k  ≤ 2, we show that q k can be chosen asymptotically less than 2. We present algorithms with asymptotic discrepancy q k  ≤ 1.59 + o(1) valid for all k and q k  ≤ ln (4) + o(1) ≤ 1.39 + o(1) valid for k being a power of two. Experiments indicate the uniform bound p k  ≤ 1.7 for all k. For small k, we show how to use a linear programming approach to compute good checkpointing algorithms. This gives discrepancies of less than 1.55 for all k < 60.

We prove the first lower bound that is asymptotically more than one, namely q k  ≥ 1.30 − o(1). We also show that optimal algorithms (yielding the infimum discrepancy) exist for all k.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ahlroth, L., Pottonen, O., Schumacher, A.: Approximately uniform online checkpointing with bounded memory. Algorithmica (to appear, 2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bern, M.W., Greene, D.H., Raghunathan, A., Sudan, M.: On-line algorithms for locating checkpoints. Algorithmica 11(1), 33–52 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bringmann, K., Doerr, B., Neumann, A., Sliacan, J.: Online checkpointing with improved worst-case guarantees. CoRR, abs/1302.4216 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chandy, K.M., Ramamoorthy, C.V.: Rollback and recovery strategies for computer programs. IEEE Transactions on Computers C-21, 546–556 (1972)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Elnozahy, E.N.M., Alvisi, L., Wang, Y.-M., Johnson, D.B.: A survey of rollback-recovery protocols in message-passing systems. ACM Computing Surveys 34(3), 375–408 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gelenbe, E.: On the optimum checkpoint interval. Journal of the ACM 26(2), 259–270 (1979)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Heuveline, V., Walther, A.: Online checkpointing for parallel adjoint computation in PDEs: Application to goal-oriented adaptivity and flow control. In: Nagel, W.E., Walter, W.V., Lehner, W. (eds.) Euro-Par 2006. LNCS, vol. 4128, pp. 689–699. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Österlind, F., Dunkels, A., Voigt, T., Tsiftes, N., Eriksson, J., Finne, N.: Sensornet checkpointing: Enabling repeatability in testbeds and realism in simulations. In: Roedig, U., Sreenan, C.J. (eds.) EWSN 2009. LNCS, vol. 5432, pp. 343–357. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Stumm, P., Walther, A.: New algorithms for optimal online checkpointing. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 32(2), 836–854 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Toueg, S., Babaoglu, Ö.: On the optimum checkpoint selection problem. SIAM Journal on Computing 13(3), 630–649 (1984)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Yi, S., Kondo, D., Andrzejak, A.: Reducing costs of spot instances via checkpointing in the Amazon elastic compute cloud. In: IEEE 3rd International Conference on Cloud Computing (CLOUD 2010), pp. 236–243 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bringmann, K., Doerr, B., Neumann, A., Sliacan, J. (2013). Online Checkpointing with Improved Worst-Case Guarantees. In: Fomin, F.V., Freivalds, R., Kwiatkowska, M., Peleg, D. (eds) Automata, Languages, and Programming. ICALP 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7965. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39206-1_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39206-1_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-39205-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-39206-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics