Skip to main content

Organizational Learning, Ambidexterity, and Firm Performance

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
The 19th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management

Abstract

Based on the theories of organizational learning and organizational ambidexterity, this paper puts forward some theoretical propositions and conducts empirical tests. The results indicate that organizational ambidexterity plays partially mediating roles between organizational learning and firm performance. This research illustrates another kind of contextual ambidexterity which is different from what Gibson and Birkinshaw (2004) depicted, clarifies the mechanisms of action the organizational context has on organizational ambidexterity, and enriches empirical evidence on the relationship between organizational ambidexterity and organizational performance.

Sponsored by Youth Scientific Fund by the Business School of Soochow University.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 369.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 469.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Atuahene-Gima K (2005) Resolving the capability–rigidity paradox in new product innovation. J Mark 69:61–83 (Oct)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghoshal S, Bartlett CA (1994) Linking organizational context and managerial action: the dimensions of quality of management. Strateg Manag J 15(1):91–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson CB, Birkinshaw J (2004) The antecedents, consequences and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Acad Manag J 47:209–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta AK, Smith KG, Shalley CE (2006) The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Acad Manag J 49(4):693–706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He ZL, Wong PK (2004) Exploration vs. exploitation: an empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organ Sci 15:481–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ Sci 2:71–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March JG (1996) Continuity and change in theories of organizational action. Adm Sci Q 41:278–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirow C, Hoelzle K, Gemuenden HG (2008) The ambidextrous organization in practice: barriers to innovation within research and development. Working Paper

    Google Scholar 

  • Raisch S, Birkinshaw J (2008) Organizational ambidexterity: antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. J Manage 34(3):375–409

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatraman N, Lee CH, Lyer B (2007) Strategic ambidexterity and sales growth: a longitudinal test in the software sector. Working Paper

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang H, Atuahene-Gima K (2007) Ambidexterity in product innovation management: the direct and contingent effects on product development performance. In: Proceedings of academy of management annual conference, August 2007, USA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jun Zhou .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zhou, J., Xue, Qz. (2013). Organizational Learning, Ambidexterity, and Firm Performance. In: Qi, E., Shen, J., Dou, R. (eds) The 19th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38442-4_57

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics