Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics ((SAPERE,volume 10))

Abstract

An agent’s preferences are sometimes formed as a result of her options or, more precisely, her beliefs about her options. It is sometimes claimed that such adaptive preferences are not autonomous, and that, therefore, actions on the basis of such preferences are not autonomous either. Through the examination of some accounts of autonomy and adaptive preferences, I show that the claim that adaptive preferences are not autonomous is highly ambiguous.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allhoff, F., Lin, P., Steinberg, J.: Ethics of Human Enhancement: An Executive Summary. Sci. Eng. Ethics 17, 201–212 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bostrom, N.: Why I Want to be a Posthuman when I Grow Up. In: Gordijn, B., Chadwick, R. (eds.) Medical Enhancement and Posthumanity, pp. 107–137. Springer, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovens, L.: Sour Grapes and Character Planning. J. Philos 89, 57–78 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruckner, D.W.: Against the Tedium of Immortality. Int. J. Philos Stud. 20, 623–644 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruckner, D.W.: Colburn on Covert Influences. Utilitas 23, 451–457 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruckner, D.W.: In Defense of Adaptive Preferences. Philos Stud. 142, 307–324 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bublitz, J.C., Merkel, R.: Autonomy and Authenticity of Enhanced Personality Traits. Bioethics 23, 360–374 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christman, J.: Autonomy and Personal History. Can J. Philos 21, 1–24 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  • Christman, J.: The Politics of Persons. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Colburn, B.: Autonomy and Adaptive Preferences. Utilitas 23, 52–71 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J.: Sour Grapes: Studies in the Subversion of Rationality. Cambridge University Press, New York (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, J.M.: Why Immortality is Not So Bad. Int. J. Philos Stud. 2, 257–270 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, L.: Knowing Their Own Good: Preferences and Liberty in Global Ethics. In: Brooks, T. (ed.) New Waves in Ethics, pp. 210–230. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstroke (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J.: Enhancing Evolution: The Ethical Case for Making Better People. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Khader, S.: Adaptive Preferences and Women’s Empowerment. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2011)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M.: Symposium on Amartya Sen’s Philosophy: 5 Adaptive Preferences and Women’s Options. Econ. Philos 17, 67–88 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oshana, M.: Autonomy and the Question of Authenticity. Soc. Theory Pract. 33, 411–429 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, J.F.: Reassessing Immortality: The Makropulos Case Revisited. In: McDaniel, K., Raibley, J.R., Feldman, R., Zimmerman, M.J. (eds.) The Good, the Right, Life and Death: Essays in Honor of Fred Feldman, Ashgate, Burlington VT, pp. 227–240 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoljar, N.: Autonomy or Authenticity? Commentary on Andrea Westlund’s ’Rethinking Relational Autonomy’ and Catriona Mackenzie and Jacqui Poltera’s ’Narrative Integration, Fragmented Selves and Autonomy. Symposium on Gender, Race and Philosophy (2011), http://web.mit.edu/sgrp

    Google Scholar 

  • Temkin, L.: Is Living Longer Living Better? J. Appl. Philos 25, 193–210 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westlund, A.C.: Selflessness and Responsibility for Self: Is Deference Compatible with Autonomy? Philos Rev. 112, 483–523 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westlund, A.C.: Rethinking Relational Autonomy. Hypatia 24, 26–49 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westlund, A.C.: Reply to Benson, Christman, Rocha, and Stoljar. In: Symposium on Gender, Race and Philosophy (2011), http://web.mit.edu/sgrp

  • Williams, B.: The Makropulos Case: Reflections on The Tedium of Immortality. In: Williams, B. (ed.) Problems of the Self, pp. 82–100. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1973)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, D.: Sour Grapes, Self-Abnegation, and Character Planning. Monist 86, 220–241 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Donald W. Bruckner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bruckner, D.W. (2013). Adaptive Preferences, Autonomy, and Extended Lives. In: Räikkä, J., Varelius, J. (eds) Adaptation and Autonomy: Adaptive Preferences in Enhancing and Ending Life. Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics, vol 10. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38376-2_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics