Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics ((SAPERE,volume 10))

Abstract

Although it is generally known that both the so-called adaptive preference formation and self-deception reduce frustration caused by cognitive dissonance, there is surprisingly little discussion about the relation between adaptive preferences and self-deception. Perhaps people have thought that the connection between them is so obvious that it does not deserve special attention. Or perhaps they have thought that these two phenomena are so clearly unconnected that any discussion is unworthy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Audi, R.: Belief, Intention, and Reasons for Action. In: Timmons, M., Creco, J., Mele, A. (eds.) Rationality and the Good: Critical Essays on the Ethics and Epistemology of Robert Audi, pp. 248–259. Oxford University Press, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Baber, H.E.: Adaptive Preferences. Soc. Theory Pract. 33, 105–126 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bach, K.: Book Review of Self-deception Unmasked. Philos Psychol. 15, 203–206 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagnoli, C.: Self-deception and Agential Authority: A Constituvist Account. Humanamente, 99–116 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Balcetis, E., Dunning, D.: Wishful Seeing: Desired Objects are Seen as Closer. Psychol. Sci. 21, 147–152 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balcetis, E., Dunning, D.: See What You Want to See: Motivational Influences on Visual Perception. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 91, 612–625 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, A.: Seeing through Self-deception. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, M.: What is Wrong with Self-deception? In: Laughlin, B.P., Rorty, A.O. (eds.) Perspectives on Self-deception, pp. 431–449. University of California Press, Berkeley (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, B.: Culture and Equality. Polity Press, Cambridge (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, T.L., Childress, J.F.: Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 6th edn. Oxford University Press, New York (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Breakey, H.: Adaptive Preferences and the Hellenistic Insight. Aust. J. Prof. Appl. Ethics 12, 29–39 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruckner, D.W.: Colburn on Covert Influences. Utilitas 23, 451–457 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruckner, D.W.: In Defense of Adaptive Preferences. Philos Stud. 142, 307–324 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chetwynd, S.B.: Right to Life, Right to Die and Assisted Suicide. J. Appl. Philos 21, 173–182 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, G.A.: Self-ownership, Freedom, and Equality. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1995)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Colburn, B.: Autonomy and Adaptive Preferences. Utilitas 23, 52–71 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellees, E.: On a Recent Theory of Rational Acceptance. Philos Stud. 44, 331–343 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J.: Sour Grapes – Utilitarianism and the Genesis of Wants. In: Christman, J. (ed.) The Inner Citadel, pp. 170–188. Oxford University Press, New York (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J.: Sour Grapes: Studies in the Subversion of Rationality. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  • Grey, W.: Right to Die or Duty to Live? The Problem of Euthanasia. J. Appl. Philos 16, 19–32 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerra, M.J.: Euthanasia in Spain: The Public Debate After Ramon Sampedro’s Case. Bioethics 13, 426–432 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawthorne, J., Bovens, L.: The Preface, The Lottery, and The Logic of Belief. Mind 108, 241–264 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khader, S.J.: Adaptive Preferences and Women’s Empowerment. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2011)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, N.: Self-deception and Moral Responsibility. Rati 17, 294–311 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockie, R.: Book Review of Self-deception Unmasked. Philos 78, 296–300 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, K.: Self-deception, Religious Belief, and the False Belief Condition. Heythrop J. 51, 1073–1074 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, M.M.: Self-deception and Morality. University of Kansas Press, Lawrence (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mele, A.R.: When Are We Self-Deceived? Humanamente 20, 1–15 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mele, A.R.: Approaching Self-deception: How Robert Audi and I Part Company. Conscious Cogn. 19, 745–750 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mele, A.R.: Self-deception Unmasked. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, R.: Problems of Sincerity. P. Aristotelian Soc. 105, 341–361 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M.: Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach. Belknap Press, Cambridge (2011)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M.: Adaptive Preferences and Women’s Options. Econ. Philos 17, 67–88 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray, G.: Toward a Computational Account of Akrasia and Self-deception. In: Laughlin, B.P., Rorty, A.O. (eds.) Perspectives on Self-deception, pp. 264–296. University of California Press, Berkeley (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, H.S.: Autonomy’s Many Normative Presuppositions. Am. Philos Q 38, 287–303 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, A.O.: The Deceptive Self: Liars, Layers, and Lairs. In: Laughlin, B.P., Rorty, A.O. (eds.) Perspectives on Self-deception, pp. 11–28. University of California Press, Berkeley (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  • Räikkä, J., Smilansky, S.: The Ethics of Alien Attitudes. Monist 95, 511–532 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Räikkä, J.: Self-deception and Religious Beliefs. Heythrop J. 48, 513–526 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott-Kakures, D.: Unsettling Questions: Cognitive Dissonance in Self-deception. Soc. Theory Pract. 35, 73–106 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott-Kakures, D.: Book Review of Self-deception Unmasked. Mind 111, 696–701 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sie, M.: Moral Agency, Conscious Control, and Deliberative Awareness. Inquiry 52, 516–531 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talbott, W.J.: Intentional Self-deception in a Single Coherent Self. Philos Phenomen Res. 55, 27–74 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trope, Y., Gervey, B., Liberman, N.: Wishful Thinking from a Pragmatic Hypothesis-testing Perspective. In: Myslobodsky, M. (ed.) The Mythomanias: The Nature of Deception and Self-deception, pp. 105–131. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, J.D.: Liberalism, Consent, and the Problem of Adaptive Preferences. Soc. Theory Pract. 21, 457–471 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, D.: Sour Grapes, Self-abnegation and Charatcter Building: Non-responsibility and Responsibility for Self-induced Preferences. Monist 86, 220–241 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juha Räikkä .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Räikkä, J. (2013). Adaptive Preferences and Self-Deception. In: Räikkä, J., Varelius, J. (eds) Adaptation and Autonomy: Adaptive Preferences in Enhancing and Ending Life. Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics, vol 10. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38376-2_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics