Abstract
Although this book project focuses on crop development to meet the challenges posed by climate and climate change we need to recognise that climate is but one of several interlinked factors, which bear on crop productivity and food security. Population increase, demographic changes, resource depletion and loss of agricultural land all combine with climate change to produce a “perfect storm”.
We note that just as exploitation of resources is not evenly spread over the globe, neither is vulnerability to climate change. It is in general the most resource-poor countries that are most at risk and are least able to ameliorate the effects. The situation is further complicated by the considerable agro-sociological differences in respect of seed systems and crop husbandry between the industrial-scale farming systems of the global north and the small and diverse systems, which support livelihoods in the global south. Both represent agro-sociological capital but in very different ways and any breeding of crops in response to climate change needs to take this into account.
The range of issues considered extends to environmental justice, power and economic imbalances, differing economic statuses, different demographic structures as well as regulatory provisions and institutional policy. We acknowledge the need to engage the local and traditional knowledge and practices of those who already face extreme climatic challenges and have acquired adaptive capacity.
In the context of top-down institutional drivers for adaptive capacity building and bottom-up adaptive capacity acquired through experiential learning we examine the social implications of research and technology. Which properties of plants should we be looking at, where should the research be done and by whom? We need to consider too the possibility of new pathogens in a changing climate and their possible impact on traditional or new crops. The social acceptability of biotechnology approaches is considered as are problems in knowledge sharing and transfer.
Finally, we examine socio-political aspects of plant breeding for crop improvement. Who is making the decisions and who benefits? Can formal and informal seed systems work side by side or even be integrated together. Other forms of collaboration and especially farmer participatory plant breeding are then discussed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
See Harmeling S (2011) Global climate risk index 2011. Germanwatch Briefing Paper http://www.germanwatch.org/cri.
- 3.
- 4.
See Oxley (2011): For many poor people dependent on agricultural-based livelihoods the recovery will be a long and difficult process; it is likely they have lost at least one year’s crop production together with livelihoods and households assets. Food production levels may be significantly lowered for the next few years because of the combined effect of soil erosion, destroyed infrastructure and contaminated soils.
Effective recovery will depend significantly on how quickly livelihoods and supporting infrastructure are restored. Fortunately the Pakistan authorities have considerable experience of organizing and mobilising large-scale social protection and food security schemes through cash or food-for-work program. Such people-intensive approaches could be well suited to major infrastructure and environmental restoration work. For example, poor people whose livelihoods are dependent on natural resources have substantial local environmental knowledge and are well positioned to support national efforts to restore and enhance the functioning of the river basin ecosystems.
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
- 9.
The technical details of this requirement have been reviewed by IPGRI (1999) http://www.bioversityinternational.org/fileadmin/bioversity/publications/pdfs/41_Key_questions_for_decision-makers.pdf?cache=1335669203.
- 10.
- 11.
- 12.
- 13.
- 14.
ISAAA (2012) Global Status of Biotech/GM Crops: 2011; available at http://www.isaaa.org/.
- 15.
Research by Raquel Chan and her team, reported by Samuel L (2012) Drought-resistant Argentine soy raises hopes, concerns. http://phys.org/news/2012-04-drought-resistant-argentine-soy.html.
- 16.
Lynas M (2011) The God Species. Fourth Estate, London.
- 17.
- 18.
The DUS is a pragmatic requirement constructed to suit the needs of a formalised certificatory system rather than adaptive capacity.
- 19.
- 20.
- 21.
- 22.
- 23.
Commonly referred to in many quarters as Civil Society Organisations.
- 24.
- 25.
- 26.
- 27.
References
Abe A, Kosugi S, Yoshida K, Natsume S, Takagi H, Kanzaki H, Matsumura H, Yoshida K, Mitsuoka C, Tamiru M, Innan H, Cano L, Kamoun S, Terauchi R (2012) Genome sequencing reveals agronomically important loci in rice using MutMap. Nat Biotechnol 30:174–178
Almekinders C (2001) Management of crop genetic diversity at community level. Deutsche Gesellshaft fur Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ), GmbH, Eschborn. http://www2.gtz.de/dokumente/bib/01-0281.pdf
Argel M, Pedro J, Miles JW, Guiot G, Jorge D, Cuadrado C, Hugo L, Carlos E (2007) Cultivar mulato II (Brachiaria hybrid CIAT 36087): a high-quality forage. CIAT Colombia. http://webapp.ciat.cgiar.org/forrajes/pdf/mulato_ii_ingles.pdf
Barbentane S (2001) Seeds, storms and strategies: a study on decision-making processes in seed supplies and seed distribution interventions in emergency situation. Case of Honduras in the Aftermaths of Hurricane Mitch. M.Sc. Thesis, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås. http://www2.siu.no/noradrap.nsf/0/67d9ef20e9f5a5a4c1256ae30036bc39?OpenDocument
Beddington J, Asaduzzaman M, Clark ME, Fernández Bremauntz A, Guillou MD, Howlett DJB, Jahn MM, Lin MM, Mamo T, Negra C, Nobre CA, Scholes RJ, Van Bo N, Wakhungu J (2012) What next for agriculture after Durban? Science 335:289–290
Bentley JW (1994) Facts, fantasies and failures of farmer participatory research. Agric Hum Values 11:140–150
Brasier C (2000) The rise of the hybrid fungi. Nature 405:134–135
Brasier CM (2008) The biosecurity threat to the UK and global environment from international trade in plants. Plant Pathol 57:792–808
Conway G (2008) The science of climate change in Africa: impacts and Adaptation a discussion paper. https://workspace.imperial.ac.uk/climatechange/public/pdfs/discussion_papers/Grantham_Institue_-_The_science_of_climate_change_in_Africa.pdf
Cruz RV, Harasawa H, Lal M, Wu S, Anokhin Y, Punsalmaa B, Honda Y, Jafari M, Li C, Huu Ninh N (2007) Asia. In: Parry MK, Canziani JP, Palutikof OF, Van der linden PJ, Hanson CE (eds) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 469–506
Deleuze G, Guatari F (2005) Anti-oedipus: capitalism and schizophrenia. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MI
De Jonge B (2009) Plants, genes and justice. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Wageningen, Wageningen. ISBN 978-90-8585-472-2
Diagne A, Midingoyi SF, Wopereis M, Inoussa AI (2010) The NERICA success story: development, achievements and lessons learned. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/AFRICAEXT/Resources/258643-1271798012256/NERICA-Success-Story-11-2010.pdf
Döring TF, Pautasso M, Finckh MR, Wolfe MS (2012) Concepts of plant health – reviewing and challenging the foundations of plant protection. Plant Pathol 61:1–15
Durkheim E (1912) The elementary forms of religious life. Free, New York (translated by Karen E Fields in 1995)
Feenberg A (2005) Critical theory of technology: an overview. Tailor Biotechnol 1(1):47–64
Fellmann T (2012) The assessment of climate change related vulnerability in the agricultural sector: reviewing conceptual frameworks. In: FAO/OECD workshop; Building resilience for adaptation to climate change in the agriculture sector, 23–24 April 2012. http://typo3.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/agphome/documents/faooecd/Frameworks.pdf
Gallagher Review of the Indirect Effects of Biofuels Production (2008) Renewable Fuels Agency. http://www.dft.gov.uk/topics/sustainable/biofuels
Gap Analysis of the Seed Sector (2011) http://www.fao.org/docrep/meeting/022/am646e.pdf
Getliffe K (2012) The role of public opinion in the regulation of genomics in the United Kingdom. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Exeter, Exeter
GM Nation Public Debate (2003) GM Nation: the findings of a public debate. GM Nation Public Debate Steering Board, London
Gregory PJ, Ingram JSI, Brklacich M (2005) Climate change and food security. Philos Trans R Soc B 29(360):2139–2148
Grieg-Gran M, Porras IT, Wunder S (2005) How can market mechanisms for forest environmental services help the poor? Preliminary lessons from Latin America. World Dev 33(9):1511–1527
Guo M, Rupe MA, Zinselmeier C, Habben J, Bowen BA, Smith OS (2004) Allelic variation of gene expression in maize hybrids. Plant Cell 16(7):1707–1716
Halewood M, Deupmann P, Sthapit BR, Vernooy P, Ceccarelli S (2006) Participatory plant breeding to promote farmers’ rights. http://www.bioversityinternational.org/fileadmin/bioversity/publications/pdfs/1254.pdf
Hardin G (1968) The tragedy of the commons. Science 162:1243–1248
Hare MD, Tatsapong P, Saipraset K (2007) Seed production of two Brachiaria hybrid cultivars in north-east Thailand. 1. Method and time of planting. Trop Grassl 41:26–34
Harwood J (2012) Europe’s Green revolution and others since: the rise and fall of peasant-friendly plant breeding. Routledge, Abingdon. ISBN 978-0-415-59868-2
Hegarty MJ, Barker GL, Brennan AC, Edwards KJ, Abbott RJ, Hiscock SJ (2008) Changes to gene expression associated with hybrid speciation in plants: further insights from transcriptomic studies in Senecio. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 363:3055–3069
Hughes SG (2002) The patenting of genes for agricultural biotechnology. In: Bryant JA, Baggott la Velle L, Searle J (eds) Bioethics for scientists. Wiley, Chichester, ISBN 0471 495328
Hughes S, Bryant JA (2002) GM crops and food: a scientific perspective. In: Bryant JA, Baggott la Velle L, Searle J (eds) Bioethics for scientists. Wiley, Chichester, ISBN 0471 495328
Hughes SG, Deibel E (2007) Plant breeder’s rights, room to maneuver. Tailor Biotechnol 2:77–78
Ingram DS (2005) Time to avert disaster. Plantsman 4:58–59
IPCC (2007) New assessment methods and the characterisation of future conditions. In: Carter TR, Jones RN, Lu X, Bhadwal S, Conde C, Mearns LO, O’Neill BC, Rounsevell MDA, Zurek MB (eds) Climate change: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
IPCC (2012) Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation. In: Field CB, Barros V, Stocker TF, Qin D, Dokken DJ, Ebi KL, Mastrandrea MD, Mach KJ, Plattner G-K, Allen SK, Tignor M, Midgley PM (eds) A special report of Working Groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Jusu M (1999) Management of genetic variability in rice (Oryza sativa L and O. glaberrima Steud.) by breeders and farmers in Sierra Leone. Doctoral Thesis, University of Wageningen, Wageningen
Kingston W (2007) Repairing incentives to invest in plant breeding. Intellect Prop Quart 10(3):294–311
Kloppenburg JR (1988) First the seed: the political economy of plant biotechnology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Lambin E (2005) Conditions for sustainability of human–environment systems: information, motivation, and capacity. Glob Environ Change 15:177–180
Langenhove L.Van (2012) Global issues: make social sciences relevant. Nature 484:442
Longley C (1997) Effects of war and displacement on local seed systems in northern Sierra Leone. In: Sperling L (ed) War and crop diversity. AGREN Network Paper No 75. Overseas Development Institute, London
Longley C, Christoplos I, Slaymaker T (2003) From relief to food security? The challenges of programming for agricultural rehabilitation. http://www.odi.org.uk/resources/docs/6315.pdf
Longley C, Richards P (1999) Farmer seed systems and disaster. In: Restoring farmers’ seed systems in disaster situations. FAO Plant Production and Protection Paper 150. FAO, Rome
Louwaars N (2007) Seeds of confusion: the impact of policies on seed systems. Ph.D. Thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, ISBN 978-90-8504-793-3
Luna E, Bruce TJ, Roberts MR, Flors V, Ton J (2012) Next generation systemic acquired resistance. Plant Physiol 158:844–853
Maas LF, McClung A, McCouch S (2010) Dissection of a QTL reveals an adaptive, interacting gene complex associated with transgressive variation for flowering time in rice. Theor Appl Genet 120(5):895–908
Manicad G (1996) Biodiversity conservation and development: the collaboration of formal and non-formal institutions. Biotechnol Dev Monit 26:15–17
Mannetje L’t (2007) The role of grasslands and forests as carbon stores. Trop Grassl 41:40–54
Mokuwa A, Nuijten E, Okry F, Teeken B, Maat H, Richards P, Struik P (2012) Robustness and strategies of adaptation within farmer varieties of African rice (Oryza glaberrima) and Asian rice (Oryza sativa) across West Africa. PLoS One 8(3):e34801
Morris M, Edmeades G, Pehu E (2006) The global need for plant breeding capacity: what roles for the public and private sectors? HortScience 41(1):30–39
Munns R, James RA, Xu B, Athman A, Conn SJ, Jordans C, Byrt CS, Hare RA, Tyerman SD, Tester M, Plett D, Gilliham M (2011) Wheat grain yield on saline soils is improved by an ancestral Na+ transporter gene. Nat Biotechnol 30:360–364
Murphy D (2007) Plant breeding and biotechnology: societal context and the future of agriculture. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, ISBN-13:978-0521823890
Nuijten E (2005) Farmer management of gene flow. Ph.D. Thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, ISBN: 90-8504-273-9
Nuijten E, Van Treuren R, Struik PC, Mokuwa A, Okry F, Teeken B, Richards P (2009) Evidence for the emergence of new rice types of interspecific hybrid origin in West-African farmer fields. PLoS One 4(10):e7335. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0007335
Nuffield Council on Bioethics Report (2011) Biofuels: The ethical issues. Nuffield Council on Bioethics, London, ISBN: 978-1-904384-22-9
Nuffield Council on Bioethics Report (1999) Genetically modified crops: the social and ethical issues. Nuffield Council on Bioethics, London. http://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/sites/default/files/GM%20crops%20-%20full%20report.pdf
Offei SK, Crane T, Hughes SG, Mokuwa A, Nuijten E, Okry F, Struik PC, Teeken B, Richards P (2009) Making better seeds for African food security: a new approach to scientist-farmer partnerships. Asp Appl Biol 96:141–148
Oxley M (2011) Field note from Pakistan floods: preventing future flood disasters. J Disaster Risk Stud 3(2):453–461
Puente-Rodriguez D (2008) The Whipala genomics: the deployment of molecular markers in small scale potato crop systems in the Bolivian Andes. Eur J Dev Res 20:377–398
Puente-Rodriguez D (2010) Redesigning genomics - reconstructing societies: local sustainable biotechnological developments. Ph.D. Thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, ISBN 978-90-8570-563-5
Richards P (2006) The history and future of African rice: food security and survival in a West African war zone. Afr Spectr 41:77–93
Richards P (2010) A Green Revolution from below? Science and technology for global food security and poverty alleviation. Wageningen University, Netherlands. ISBN 987-90-8585-885-0
Richards P, De Bruin-Hoekzema M, Hughes SG, Kudadjie-Freeman C, Offei S, Kwame Struik PC, Zannou A (2009) Seed systems for African food security: linking molecular genetic analysis and cultural knowledge in West Africa. Int J Technol Manag 45:196–214
Richards P, Ruivenkamp G (1997) Seeds and survival: crop genetic resources in war and reconstruction in Africa. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome
Smilde WD, Brignet D, Jagger L, Perkins S, Jones JDG (2005) Solanum mochiquense chromosome IX carries a novel late blight resistance gene Rpi-moc1. Theor Appl Genet 110:252–258
Smith A, Stirling A (2008) Social-ecological resilience and socio-technical transitions: critical issues foe sustainability governance. STEPS Working Paper 8. Brighton Steps Centre, Brighton
Shen X (2010) Understanding the evolution of rice technology in China: from traditional agriculture to GM rice today. J Dev Stud 46(6):1026–1046
Song Y (1998) ‘New’ seeds in ‘Old’ China: impact study of CIMMYT’s Collaborative Programme on Maize Breeding in South-West China. Ph.D. Thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen
Song Y, Vernooy R (2010) Seeds and synergies: innovating rural development in China. International Development Research Centre, Ottawa
UNEP (2012) Knowledge for the twenty first century: indigenous knowledge, traditional knowledge, science and connecting diverse knowledge systems, annex to UNEP/IPBES.m1/2/INF/9
Walker G (2012) Environmental justice: concepts, evidence and politics. Routledge, London. ISBN 978-0-415-58973-4
WARDA (2001) NERICA: rice for life. WARDA, Cotonou, ISBN: 92-9113-217-9. http://www.warda.cgiar.org/publications/NERICA8.pdf
Weltzien E, Christinck A (2009) Methodologies for priority setting, Chap 4. In: Ceccerelli S, Guigmaraes EP, Weltzien E (eds) Plant breeding and farmer participation. FAO, Rome. ISBN 978-92-5-106382-8. ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/012/i1070e/i1070e00.pdf
Weltzien E, Smith ME, Meitzner LS, Sperling L (2000) Technical and institutional issues in participatory plant breeding – from the perspective of formal plant breeding a global analysis of issues, results, and current experience. http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/Pnack761.pdf
Witcombe JR, Joshi A, Joshi KD, Shapit BR (1996) Farmer participatory crop improvement: varietal selection and breeding methods and their impact on biodiversity. Exp Agric 32:445–460
Wolfe MS (1985) The current status and prospects of multiline cultivars and variety mixtures for disease control. Annu Rev Phytopathol 23:251–273
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hughes, S.G., Richards, P., Bryant, J.A., Shen, X. (2013). JOINING UP: The Social and Political Dimensions. In: Kole, C. (eds) Genomics and Breeding for Climate-Resilient Crops. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37045-8_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37045-8_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-37044-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-37045-8
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)