Skip to main content

JOINING UP: The Social and Political Dimensions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Genomics and Breeding for Climate-Resilient Crops
  • 1651 Accesses

Abstract

Although this book project focuses on crop development to meet the challenges posed by climate and climate change we need to recognise that climate is but one of several interlinked factors, which bear on crop productivity and food security. Population increase, demographic changes, resource depletion and loss of agricultural land all combine with climate change to produce a “perfect storm”.

We note that just as exploitation of resources is not evenly spread over the globe, neither is vulnerability to climate change. It is in general the most resource-poor countries that are most at risk and are least able to ameliorate the effects. The situation is further complicated by the considerable agro-sociological differences in respect of seed systems and crop husbandry between the industrial-scale farming systems of the global north and the small and diverse systems, which support livelihoods in the global south. Both represent agro-sociological capital but in very different ways and any breeding of crops in response to climate change needs to take this into account.

The range of issues considered extends to environmental justice, power and economic imbalances, differing economic statuses, different demographic structures as well as regulatory provisions and institutional policy. We acknowledge the need to engage the local and traditional knowledge and practices of those who already face extreme climatic challenges and have acquired adaptive capacity.

In the context of top-down institutional drivers for adaptive capacity building and bottom-up adaptive capacity acquired through experiential learning we examine the social implications of research and technology. Which properties of plants should we be looking at, where should the research be done and by whom? We need to consider too the possibility of new pathogens in a changing climate and their possible impact on traditional or new crops. The social acceptability of biotechnology approaches is considered as are problems in knowledge sharing and transfer.

Finally, we examine socio-political aspects of plant breeding for crop improvement. Who is making the decisions and who benefits? Can formal and informal seed systems work side by side or even be integrated together. Other forms of collaboration and especially farmer participatory plant breeding are then discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://gain.globalai.org/.

  2. 2.

    See Harmeling S (2011) Global climate risk index 2011. Germanwatch Briefing Paper http://www.germanwatch.org/cri.

  3. 3.

    http://www.apsnet.org/edcenter/advanced/topics/cultivarmixes/Pages/default.aspx.

  4. 4.

    See Oxley (2011): For many poor people dependent on agricultural-based livelihoods the recovery will be a long and difficult process; it is likely they have lost at least one year’s crop production together with livelihoods and households assets. Food production levels may be significantly lowered for the next few years because of the combined effect of soil erosion, destroyed infrastructure and contaminated soils.

    Effective recovery will depend significantly on how quickly livelihoods and supporting infrastructure are restored. Fortunately the Pakistan authorities have considerable experience of organizing and mobilising large-scale social protection and food security schemes through cash or food-for-work program. Such people-intensive approaches could be well suited to major infrastructure and environmental restoration work. For example, poor people whose livelihoods are dependent on natural resources have substantial local environmental knowledge and are well positioned to support national efforts to restore and enhance the functioning of the river basin ecosystems.

  5. 5.

    http://www.wbs.wur.nl/UK/Partnerships/Plant+Breeding+Business+School/Plant+Breeding+Business+School+detail/default.htm.

  6. 6.

    http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/EXTOED/EXTGLOREGPARPROG/0,,contentMDK:21106947~menuPK:4426475~pagePK:64829573~piPK:64829550~theSitePK:4426313,00.html.

  7. 7.

    http://www.fao.org/docrep/012/i1399e/i1399e00.htm and http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/agphome/documents/climate/AGPC_grassland_webversion_19.pdf.

  8. 8.

    http://www.fao.org/ag/AGP/agpc/doc/climatechange/papers/abberton_%20geneticimprovement.pdf.

  9. 9.

    The technical details of this requirement have been reviewed by IPGRI (1999) http://www.bioversityinternational.org/fileadmin/bioversity/publications/pdfs/41_Key_questions_for_decision-makers.pdf?cache=1335669203.

  10. 10.

    http://find-your-feet.org/blog/tag/seed-conservation/.

  11. 11.

    http://www.un.org/climatechange/projectsearch/print.asp?projID=285&ck=bzIQk94xeXu1IGT.

  12. 12.

    http://www.globalrust.org/db/attachments/resources/863/4/Lagoda_BGRI2oo9.pdf.

  13. 13.

    http://www.un.org/climatechange/projectsearch/print.asp?projID=285&ck=bzIQk94xeXu1IGT.

  14. 14.

    ISAAA (2012) Global Status of Biotech/GM Crops: 2011; available at http://www.isaaa.org/.

  15. 15.

    Research by Raquel Chan and her team, reported by Samuel L (2012) Drought-resistant Argentine soy raises hopes, concerns. http://phys.org/news/2012-04-drought-resistant-argentine-soy.html.

  16. 16.

    Lynas M (2011) The God Species. Fourth Estate, London.

  17. 17.

    http://www.genomicsnetwork.ac.uk/media/IP_Workshop_Report_July08_Final.pdf.

  18. 18.

    The DUS is a pragmatic requirement constructed to suit the needs of a formalised certificatory system rather than adaptive capacity.

  19. 19.

    http://www.landinstitute.org/.

  20. 20.

    http://www.grain.org/article/entries/111-nerica-another-trap-for-small-farmers-in-africa.

  21. 21.

    http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/Pnack761.pdf.

  22. 22.

    http://www.bioversityinternational.org/fileadmin/bioversity/publications/pdfs/1254.pdf.

  23. 23.

    Commonly referred to in many quarters as Civil Society Organisations.

  24. 24.

    http://www.rockefellerfoundation.org/news/speeches-presentations/bringing-resilience-agenda-climate.

  25. 25.

    http://webapp.ciat.cgiar.org/forrajes/pdf/mulato_ii_ingles.pdf.

  26. 26.

    http://www.stipa.com.au/NativeGrasses/BenefitsOfNativeGrasses.html.

  27. 27.

    http://ciat-library.ciat.cgiar.org:8080/jspui/bitstream/123456789/6638/13/OFDA_bibliography_June_2004.pdf.

References

  • Abe A, Kosugi S, Yoshida K, Natsume S, Takagi H, Kanzaki H, Matsumura H, Yoshida K, Mitsuoka C, Tamiru M, Innan H, Cano L, Kamoun S, Terauchi R (2012) Genome sequencing reveals agronomically important loci in rice using MutMap. Nat Biotechnol 30:174–178

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Almekinders C (2001) Management of crop genetic diversity at community level. Deutsche Gesellshaft fur Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ), GmbH, Eschborn. http://www2.gtz.de/dokumente/bib/01-0281.pdf

  • Argel M, Pedro J, Miles JW, Guiot G, Jorge D, Cuadrado C, Hugo L, Carlos E (2007) Cultivar mulato II (Brachiaria hybrid CIAT 36087): a high-quality forage. CIAT Colombia. http://webapp.ciat.cgiar.org/forrajes/pdf/mulato_ii_ingles.pdf

  • Barbentane S (2001) Seeds, storms and strategies: a study on decision-making processes in seed supplies and seed distribution interventions in emergency situation. Case of Honduras in the Aftermaths of Hurricane Mitch. M.Sc. Thesis, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås. http://www2.siu.no/noradrap.nsf/0/67d9ef20e9f5a5a4c1256ae30036bc39?OpenDocument

  • Beddington J, Asaduzzaman M, Clark ME, Fernández Bremauntz A, Guillou MD, Howlett DJB, Jahn MM, Lin MM, Mamo T, Negra C, Nobre CA, Scholes RJ, Van Bo N, Wakhungu J (2012) What next for agriculture after Durban? Science 335:289–290

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bentley JW (1994) Facts, fantasies and failures of farmer participatory research. Agric Hum Values 11:140–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brasier C (2000) The rise of the hybrid fungi. Nature 405:134–135

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brasier CM (2008) The biosecurity threat to the UK and global environment from international trade in plants. Plant Pathol 57:792–808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway G (2008) The science of climate change in Africa: impacts and Adaptation a discussion paper. https://workspace.imperial.ac.uk/climatechange/public/pdfs/discussion_papers/Grantham_Institue_-_The_science_of_climate_change_in_Africa.pdf

  • Cruz RV, Harasawa H, Lal M, Wu S, Anokhin Y, Punsalmaa B, Honda Y, Jafari M, Li C, Huu Ninh N (2007) Asia. In: Parry MK, Canziani JP, Palutikof OF, Van der linden PJ, Hanson CE (eds) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 469–506

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze G, Guatari F (2005) Anti-oedipus: capitalism and schizophrenia. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MI

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jonge B (2009) Plants, genes and justice. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Wageningen, Wageningen. ISBN 978-90-8585-472-2

    Google Scholar 

  • Diagne A, Midingoyi SF, Wopereis M, Inoussa AI (2010) The NERICA success story: development, achievements and lessons learned. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/AFRICAEXT/Resources/258643-1271798012256/NERICA-Success-Story-11-2010.pdf

  • Döring TF, Pautasso M, Finckh MR, Wolfe MS (2012) Concepts of plant health – reviewing and challenging the foundations of plant protection. Plant Pathol 61:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim E (1912) The elementary forms of religious life. Free, New York (translated by Karen E Fields in 1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • Feenberg A (2005) Critical theory of technology: an overview. Tailor Biotechnol 1(1):47–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Fellmann T (2012) The assessment of climate change related vulnerability in the agricultural sector: reviewing conceptual frameworks. In: FAO/OECD workshop; Building resilience for adaptation to climate change in the agriculture sector, 23–24 April 2012. http://typo3.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/agphome/documents/faooecd/Frameworks.pdf

  • Gallagher Review of the Indirect Effects of Biofuels Production (2008) Renewable Fuels Agency. http://www.dft.gov.uk/topics/sustainable/biofuels

  • Gap Analysis of the Seed Sector (2011) http://www.fao.org/docrep/meeting/022/am646e.pdf

  • Getliffe K (2012) The role of public opinion in the regulation of genomics in the United Kingdom. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Exeter, Exeter

    Google Scholar 

  • GM Nation Public Debate (2003) GM Nation: the findings of a public debate. GM Nation Public Debate Steering Board, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory PJ, Ingram JSI, Brklacich M (2005) Climate change and food security. Philos Trans R Soc B 29(360):2139–2148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grieg-Gran M, Porras IT, Wunder S (2005) How can market mechanisms for forest environmental services help the poor? Preliminary lessons from Latin America. World Dev 33(9):1511–1527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo M, Rupe MA, Zinselmeier C, Habben J, Bowen BA, Smith OS (2004) Allelic variation of gene expression in maize hybrids. Plant Cell 16(7):1707–1716

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Halewood M, Deupmann P, Sthapit BR, Vernooy P, Ceccarelli S (2006) Participatory plant breeding to promote farmers’ rights. http://www.bioversityinternational.org/fileadmin/bioversity/publications/pdfs/1254.pdf

  • Hardin G (1968) The tragedy of the commons. Science 162:1243–1248

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hare MD, Tatsapong P, Saipraset K (2007) Seed production of two Brachiaria hybrid cultivars in north-east Thailand. 1. Method and time of planting. Trop Grassl 41:26–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Harwood J (2012) Europe’s Green revolution and others since: the rise and fall of peasant-friendly plant breeding. Routledge, Abingdon. ISBN 978-0-415-59868-2

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegarty MJ, Barker GL, Brennan AC, Edwards KJ, Abbott RJ, Hiscock SJ (2008) Changes to gene expression associated with hybrid speciation in plants: further insights from transcriptomic studies in Senecio. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 363:3055–3069

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes SG (2002) The patenting of genes for agricultural biotechnology. In: Bryant JA, Baggott la Velle L, Searle J (eds) Bioethics for scientists. Wiley, Chichester, ISBN 0471 495328

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes S, Bryant JA (2002) GM crops and food: a scientific perspective. In: Bryant JA, Baggott la Velle L, Searle J (eds) Bioethics for scientists. Wiley, Chichester, ISBN 0471 495328

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes SG, Deibel E (2007) Plant breeder’s rights, room to maneuver. Tailor Biotechnol 2:77–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingram DS (2005) Time to avert disaster. Plantsman 4:58–59

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2007) New assessment methods and the characterisation of future conditions. In: Carter TR, Jones RN, Lu X, Bhadwal S, Conde C, Mearns LO, O’Neill BC, Rounsevell MDA, Zurek MB (eds) Climate change: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2012) Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation. In: Field CB, Barros V, Stocker TF, Qin D, Dokken DJ, Ebi KL, Mastrandrea MD, Mach KJ, Plattner G-K, Allen SK, Tignor M, Midgley PM (eds) A special report of Working Groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Jusu M (1999) Management of genetic variability in rice (Oryza sativa L and O. glaberrima Steud.) by breeders and farmers in Sierra Leone. Doctoral Thesis, University of Wageningen, Wageningen

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingston W (2007) Repairing incentives to invest in plant breeding. Intellect Prop Quart 10(3):294–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Kloppenburg JR (1988) First the seed: the political economy of plant biotechnology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambin E (2005) Conditions for sustainability of human–environment systems: information, motivation, and capacity. Glob Environ Change 15:177–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langenhove L.Van (2012) Global issues: make social sciences relevant. Nature 484:442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longley C (1997) Effects of war and displacement on local seed systems in northern Sierra Leone. In: Sperling L (ed) War and crop diversity. AGREN Network Paper No 75. Overseas Development Institute, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Longley C, Christoplos I, Slaymaker T (2003) From relief to food security? The challenges of programming for agricultural rehabilitation. http://www.odi.org.uk/resources/docs/6315.pdf

  • Longley C, Richards P (1999) Farmer seed systems and disaster. In: Restoring farmers’ seed systems in disaster situations. FAO Plant Production and Protection Paper 150. FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Louwaars N (2007) Seeds of confusion: the impact of policies on seed systems. Ph.D. Thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, ISBN 978-90-8504-793-3

    Google Scholar 

  • Luna E, Bruce TJ, Roberts MR, Flors V, Ton J (2012) Next generation systemic acquired resistance. Plant Physiol 158:844–853

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maas LF, McClung A, McCouch S (2010) Dissection of a QTL reveals an adaptive, interacting gene complex associated with transgressive variation for flowering time in rice. Theor Appl Genet 120(5):895–908

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Manicad G (1996) Biodiversity conservation and development: the collaboration of formal and non-formal institutions. Biotechnol Dev Monit 26:15–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannetje L’t (2007) The role of grasslands and forests as carbon stores. Trop Grassl 41:40–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Mokuwa A, Nuijten E, Okry F, Teeken B, Maat H, Richards P, Struik P (2012) Robustness and strategies of adaptation within farmer varieties of African rice (Oryza glaberrima) and Asian rice (Oryza sativa) across West Africa. PLoS One 8(3):e34801

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris M, Edmeades G, Pehu E (2006) The global need for plant breeding capacity: what roles for the public and private sectors? HortScience 41(1):30–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Munns R, James RA, Xu B, Athman A, Conn SJ, Jordans C, Byrt CS, Hare RA, Tyerman SD, Tester M, Plett D, Gilliham M (2011) Wheat grain yield on saline soils is improved by an ancestral Na+ transporter gene. Nat Biotechnol 30:360–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy D (2007) Plant breeding and biotechnology: societal context and the future of agriculture. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, ISBN-13:978-0521823890

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuijten E (2005) Farmer management of gene flow. Ph.D. Thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, ISBN: 90-8504-273-9

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuijten E, Van Treuren R, Struik PC, Mokuwa A, Okry F, Teeken B, Richards P (2009) Evidence for the emergence of new rice types of interspecific hybrid origin in West-African farmer fields. PLoS One 4(10):e7335. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0007335

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nuffield Council on Bioethics Report (2011) Biofuels: The ethical issues. Nuffield Council on Bioethics, London, ISBN: 978-1-904384-22-9

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuffield Council on Bioethics Report (1999) Genetically modified crops: the social and ethical issues. Nuffield Council on Bioethics, London. http://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/sites/default/files/GM%20crops%20-%20full%20report.pdf

  • Offei SK, Crane T, Hughes SG, Mokuwa A, Nuijten E, Okry F, Struik PC, Teeken B, Richards P (2009) Making better seeds for African food security: a new approach to scientist-farmer partnerships. Asp Appl Biol 96:141–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxley M (2011) Field note from Pakistan floods: preventing future flood disasters. J Disaster Risk Stud 3(2):453–461

    Google Scholar 

  • Puente-Rodriguez D (2008) The Whipala genomics: the deployment of molecular markers in small scale potato crop systems in the Bolivian Andes. Eur J Dev Res 20:377–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puente-Rodriguez D (2010) Redesigning genomics - reconstructing societies: local sustainable biotechnological developments. Ph.D. Thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, ISBN 978-90-8570-563-5

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards P (2006) The history and future of African rice: food security and survival in a West African war zone. Afr Spectr 41:77–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards P (2010) A Green Revolution from below? Science and technology for global food security and poverty alleviation. Wageningen University, Netherlands. ISBN 987-90-8585-885-0

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards P, De Bruin-Hoekzema M, Hughes SG, Kudadjie-Freeman C, Offei S, Kwame Struik PC, Zannou A (2009) Seed systems for African food security: linking molecular genetic analysis and cultural knowledge in West Africa. Int J Technol Manag 45:196–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards P, Ruivenkamp G (1997) Seeds and survival: crop genetic resources in war and reconstruction in Africa. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Smilde WD, Brignet D, Jagger L, Perkins S, Jones JDG (2005) Solanum mochiquense chromosome IX carries a novel late blight resistance gene Rpi-moc1. Theor Appl Genet 110:252–258

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith A, Stirling A (2008) Social-ecological resilience and socio-technical transitions: critical issues foe sustainability governance. STEPS Working Paper 8. Brighton Steps Centre, Brighton

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen X (2010) Understanding the evolution of rice technology in China: from traditional agriculture to GM rice today. J Dev Stud 46(6):1026–1046

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Song Y (1998) ‘New’ seeds in ‘Old’ China: impact study of CIMMYT’s Collaborative Programme on Maize Breeding in South-West China. Ph.D. Thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen

    Google Scholar 

  • Song Y, Vernooy R (2010) Seeds and synergies: innovating rural development in China. International Development Research Centre, Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP (2012) Knowledge for the twenty first century: indigenous knowledge, traditional knowledge, science and connecting diverse knowledge systems, annex to UNEP/IPBES.m1/2/INF/9

  • Walker G (2012) Environmental justice: concepts, evidence and politics. Routledge, London. ISBN 978-0-415-58973-4

    Google Scholar 

  • WARDA (2001) NERICA: rice for life. WARDA, Cotonou, ISBN: 92-9113-217-9. http://www.warda.cgiar.org/publications/NERICA8.pdf

  • Weltzien E, Christinck A (2009) Methodologies for priority setting, Chap 4. In: Ceccerelli S, Guigmaraes EP, Weltzien E (eds) Plant breeding and farmer participation. FAO, Rome. ISBN 978-92-5-106382-8. ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/012/i1070e/i1070e00.pdf

  • Weltzien E, Smith ME, Meitzner LS, Sperling L (2000) Technical and institutional issues in participatory plant breeding – from the perspective of formal plant breeding a global analysis of issues, results, and current experience. http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/Pnack761.pdf

  • Witcombe JR, Joshi A, Joshi KD, Shapit BR (1996) Farmer participatory crop improvement: varietal selection and breeding methods and their impact on biodiversity. Exp Agric 32:445–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe MS (1985) The current status and prospects of multiline cultivars and variety mixtures for disease control. Annu Rev Phytopathol 23:251–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen G. Hughes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hughes, S.G., Richards, P., Bryant, J.A., Shen, X. (2013). JOINING UP: The Social and Political Dimensions. In: Kole, C. (eds) Genomics and Breeding for Climate-Resilient Crops. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37045-8_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics