Skip to main content

ACL Injuries and Surgery: Current Evidence and Modern Development

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Sports Injuries

Abstract

Anterior cruciate ligament injuries are among the most common orthopedic injuries affecting young and active patients. Several variations in surgical techniques exist to treat these injuries. Autografts have shown comparable results to nonirradiated allografts with respect to clinical stability, functional outcomes, and failure rates. Several randomized trials have been published comparing the double-bundle and single-bundle techniques. Pooled analysis of such studies shows the two techniques produce comparable functional outcomes, but suggest the double-bundle technique leads to superior clinical stability. There are several options for graft fixation, including interference screw, cross-pin, and cortical fixation. Despite a proliferation in fixation devices, there remains a lack of evidence to endorse any one technique exclusively. Postoperative protocols also remain varied, and current evidence has not supported the use of bracing or outpatient physiotherapy compared to home physiotherapy. The findings of future high-quality randomized trials have the potential to strengthen current reviews and inform clinical practice guidelines, to ensure that the practice of ACL reconstruction surgery remains “evidence based” and on par with emerging knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahldén M, Senert N, Karlsson J et al (2013) A prospective randomized study comparing double- and single-bundle techniques for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 41:2484 [Epub ahead of print]

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ayeni OR, Evaniew N, Ogilvie R et al (2013) Evidence-based practice to improve outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Sports Med 32(1):71–80

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Borchers JR, Pedroza A, Kaeding C (2009) Activity level and graft type as risk factors for anterior cruciate ligament graft failure: a case-control study. Am J Sports Med 37(12):2362–2367

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chechik O, Amar E, Khashan M et al (2013) An international survey on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction practices. Int Orthop 37(2):201–206

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Colvin A, Sharma C, Parides M et al (2011) What is the best femoral fixation of hamstring autografts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction?: a meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469(4):1075–1081

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cook C, Nguyen L, Hegedus E et al (2008) Continental variations in preoperative and postoperative management of patients with anterior cruciate ligament repair. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 44(3):253–261

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grant JA, Mohtadi NG (2010) Two- to 4-year follow-up to a comparison of home versus physical therapy-supervised rehabilitation programs after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 38(7):1389–1394

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grant JA, Mohtadi NG, Maitland ME et al (2005) Comparison of home versus physical therapy-supervised rehabilitation programs after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Sports Med 33:1288–1297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hu J, Qu J, Xu D et al (2013) Allograft versus autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an up-to-date meta-analysis of prospective studies. Int Orthop 37(2):311–320

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hussein M, van Eck CF, Cretnik A et al (2012) Prospective randomized clinical evaluation of conventional single-bundle, anatomic single-bundle, and anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 40(3):512–520

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson RJ, Beynnon BD (2012) What do we really know about rehabilitation after ACL reconstruction?: commentary on an article by L.M. Kruse, MD, et al.: “rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A systematic review”. J Bone Joint Surg 94(19):e14, 1-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jost PW, Dy CJ, Robertson CM et al (2011) Allograft use in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. HSS J 7(3):251–256

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kruse LM, Gray B, Wright RW (2012) Rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg 94(19):1737–1748

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lyman S, Koulouvaris P, Sherman S et al (2009) Epidemiology of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: trends, readmissions, and subsequent knee surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(10):2321–2328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mariscalco MW, Magnussen RA, Mehta D et al (2013) Autograft versus nonirradiated allograft tissue for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review. Am J Sports Med 42:492 [Epub ahead of print]

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mohtadi NG, Chan DS, Dainty KN et al (2011) Patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament rupture in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 9:CD005960

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Muller B, Hofbauer M, Wongcharoenwatana J et al (2013) Indications and contraindications for double-bundle ACL reconstruction. Int Orthop 37(2):239–246

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prodromos CC, Fu FH, Howell SM et al (2008) Controversies in soft-tissue anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: grafts, bundles, tunnels, fixation, and harvest. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 16(7):376–384

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelsson K, Andersson D, Ahldén M et al (2013) Trends in surgeon preference on anterior cruciate ligament reconstructive techniques. Clin Sports Med 32(1):111–126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shen C, Jiang SD, Jiang LS et al (2010) Bioabsorbable versus metallic interference screw fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arthroscopy 26(5):705–713

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tiamklang T, Sumanont S, Foocharoen et al (2012) Double-bundle versus single-bundle reconstruction for anterior cruciate ligament rupture in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 11:CD008413

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wright RW, Preston E, Fleming BC et al (2008a) A systematic review of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction rehabilitation: part I: continuous passive motion, early weight bearing, postoperative bracing, and home-based rehabilitation. J Knee Surg 21(3):217–224

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wright RW, Preston E, Fleming BC et al (2008b) A systematic review of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction rehabilitation: part II: open versus closed kinetic chain exercises, neuromuscular electrical stimulation, accelerated rehabilitation, and miscellaneous topics. J Knee Surg 21(3):225–234

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z, Gu B, Zhu W et al (2013) Double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions: a prospective, randomized study with 2-year follow-up. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 24:559 [Epub ahead of print]

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raman Mundi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this entry

Cite this entry

Mundi, R., Chaudhry, H., Bhandari, M. (2014). ACL Injuries and Surgery: Current Evidence and Modern Development. In: Doral, M., Karlsson, J. (eds) Sports Injuries. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36801-1_102-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36801-1_102-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-36801-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference MedicineReference Module Medicine

Publish with us

Policies and ethics