Skip to main content

Don’t Just Go with the Flow: Cautionary Tales of Fluid Flow Approximation

  • Conference paper
Computer Performance Engineering (EPEW 2012, UKPEW 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 7587))

Abstract

Fluid flow approximation allows efficient analysis of large scale PEPA models. Given a model, this method outputs how the mean, variance, and any other moment of the model’s stochastic behaviour evolves as a function of time. We investigate whether the method’s results, i.e. moments of the behaviour, are sufficient to capture system’s actual dynamics.

We ran a series of experiments on a client-server model. For some parametrizations of the model, the model’s behaviour can accurately be characterized by the fluid flow approximations of its moments. However, the experiments show that for some other parametrizations, these moments are not sufficient to capture the model’s behaviour, highlighting a pitfall of relying only on the results of fluid flow analysis. The results suggest that the sufficiency of the fluid flow method for the analysis of a model depends on the model’s concrete parametrization. They also make it clear that the existing criteria for deciding on the sufficiency of the fluid flow method are not robust.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 72.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bradley, J.T., Gilmore, S., Hillston, J.: Analysing distributed internet worm attacks using continuous state-space approximation of process algebra models. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 74(6), 1013–1032 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Harrison, M.D., Massink, M., Latella, D.: Engineering crowd interaction within smart environments. In: Proc. of the 1st ACM SIGCHI Symposium on Engineering Interactive Computing Systems, EICS 2009, pp. 117–122. ACM, USA (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wang, H., Laurenson, D., Hillston, J.: PEPA analysis of MAP effects in hierarchical mobile IPv6. In: Proc. 15th Int. Symposium on Modeling, Analysis, and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems, MASCOTS 2007, pp. 337–342. IEEE Computer Society (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ding, J., Hillston, J., Laurenson, D.: Performance modelling of content adaptation for a personal distributed environment. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 48(1), 93–112 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hillston, J.: Fluid flow approximation of PEPA models. In: 2nd Int. Conf. on the Quantitative Evaluation of Systems, pp. 33–42 (September 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hayden, R., Bradley, J.T.: A fluid analysis framework for a Markovian process algebra. Theoretical Computer Science 411(22-24), 2260–2297 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Stefanek, A., Hayden, R., Bradley, J.T.: Hybrid analysis of large scale PEPA models. In: 9th Workshop on Process Algebra and Stochastically Timed Activities (PASTA 2010) (September 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bortolussi, L., Galpin, V., Hillston, J., Tribastone, M.: Hybrid semantics for PEPA. In: 7th Int. Conf. on the Quantitative Evaluation of Systems (QEST), pp. 181–190 (September 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hillston, J.: A compositional approach to performance modelling. Cambridge University Press (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tribastone, M., Gilmore, S., Hillston, J.: Scalable differential analysis of process algebra models. IEEE Trans. on Software Engineering 38(1), 205–219 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cao, Y., Petzold, L.: Accuracy limitations and the measurement of errors in the stochastic simulation of chemically reacting systems. Journal of Computational Physics 212(1), 6–24 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Tribastone, M., Duguid, A., Gilmore, S.: The PEPA eclipse plugin. SIGMETRICS Perform. Eval. Rev. 36(4), 28–33 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Stefanek, A., Hayden, R., Bradley, J.T.: GPA - a tool for fluid scalability analysis of massively parallel systems. In: Proc. 8th Int. Conf. on Quantitative Evaluation of SysTems, QEST 2011, pp. 147–148. IEEE Computer Society (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Pourranjbar, A., Hillston, J., Bortolussi, L. (2013). Don’t Just Go with the Flow: Cautionary Tales of Fluid Flow Approximation. In: Tribastone, M., Gilmore, S. (eds) Computer Performance Engineering. EPEW UKPEW 2012 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7587. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36781-6_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36781-6_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-36780-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-36781-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics