Skip to main content

The Relation Between Ethics and Innovation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Social Innovation

Part of the book series: CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance ((CSEG))

Abstract

At first glance it might seem that innovation and ethics are two opposing concepts. Ethics has a prescriptive element. It sets out what we can and cannot do, and therefore limits our scope of action. By contrast, innovation leads to doing things differently, breaking the mold, overcoming barriers. In this sense, there may be those who would believe that ethics could limit innovation. But that view misinterprets what ethics is all about. Ethics cannot be reduced to a legalistic view of human behavior, much less to a negative view that defines ethics as a list of prohibitions. A positive, comprehensive view of ethics will make us realize that ethics and innovation are closely related: that innovation – like any other human activity – is deeply rooted in ethics, and that ethics inspires and encourages innovation. In this chapter we will put aside the ethical dilemmas that may arise with respect to innovation, and will move into a more conceptual and positive dimension.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Clark WH Jr, Vranka L (2012) The Need and Rationale for the Benefit Corporation, White Paper.http://benefitcorp.net/storage/documents/The_Need_and_Rationale_for_Benefit_Corporations_ April_2012.pdf, version 1/26/12

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker PF (1954) The practice of management. Harper & Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberger R, Byron K (2011) Rewards and Creativity. In: Runco MA, Pritzker SR (eds) Encyclopedia of creativity, vol 2. Academic, San Diego, pp 313–318

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberger R, Rhoades L (2001) Incremental effects of rewards on creativity. J Pers Soc Psychol 81:728–741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fontrodona J, Sison AJG (2006) The nature of the firm, agency theory and shareholder theory: a critique from philosophical anthropology. J Bus Ethics 66(1):33–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fontrodona J, Guillén M, Rodríguez A (2010) La ética de la empresa en la encrucijada. Eunsa, Pamplona

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman RE (1984) Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Pitman, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant AM, Berg JM (2011) Prosocial motivation at work: when, why, and how making a difference makes a difference. In: Cameron K, Spreitzer G (eds) Oxford handbook of positive organizational scholarship. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 28–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant AM, Berry JW (2011) The necessity of others is the mother of invention: intrinsic and prosocial motivations, perspective taking, and creativity. Acad Manage J 54(1):73–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hildreth PM, Kim C (2004) Knowledge networks: innovation through communities of practice. Idea Group Publishers, Hershey

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin-Rozalis M (2010) Using abductive research logic: ‘the logic of discovery’, to construct a rigorous explanation of amorphous evaluation findings. J MultiDiscip Eval 6(13):11–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Nubiola J (2005) The classification of the sciences and cross-disciplinarity. Trans Charles S Peirce Soc 41(2):271–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce CS (1931–1958) In: Hartshorne C, Weiss P, Burks AW (eds) Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vol 1–8. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME, Kramer MR (2011) Creating shared value. Harv Bus Rev 89(1/2):62–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichertz J (2009) Abduction: the logic of discovery of grounded theory. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum Qual Soc Res 11(1), Art. 13, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1001135

  • Sawyer K (2007) Group genius: the creative power of collaboration. Basic Books, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Turrisi PA (1990) Peirce’s logic of discovery: abduction and the universal categories. Trans Charles S Peirce Soc 26(4):465–497

    Google Scholar 

  • Werhane PH (1998) ‘Moral imagination and the search for ethical decision-making in management’, The Ruffin series of the society for business ethics. Bus Ethics Q 1:75–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Werhane PH (2002) Moral imagination and systems thinking. J Bus Ethics 38(1/2):33–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yunus M (2007a) Creating a world without poverty. Social business and the future of capitalism. Public Affairs, New York, p 320

    Google Scholar 

  • Yunus M (2007b) Creating a world without poverty. Author’s summary, http://www.muhammadyunus.org/Publications/creating-a-world-without-poverty

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joan Fontrodona .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fontrodona, J. (2013). The Relation Between Ethics and Innovation. In: Osburg, T., Schmidpeter, R. (eds) Social Innovation. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36540-9_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics