Skip to main content

Endogenous Growth Theory and Regional Extensions

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Regional Science

Abstract

In this chapter, we outline the basic mechanisms in endogenous growth theory that identify knowledge creation and diffusion as the core driver of economic growth. Then we discuss how new economic geography, urban economics, organizational science, and entrepreneurship theory have “regionalized” the mechanisms involved. Knowledge creation, however, has been dubbed a “proximate cause” of growth, and the quest for “fundamental causes” has continued. We discuss this recent development in macroeconomic growth theory and argue that the new “institutional approach to growth” opens up a lot of new avenues for future research. Once again, the importance of cities, organizations, and entrepreneurship is largely ignored in macro growth theory. Yet economic geography, urban economics, organizational science, and entrepreneurship theory have a lot to contribute to growth theory by both empirically and theoretically developing our understanding of local institutions and linking these to regional economic development and growth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Acemoglu D (2009) Introduction to modern economic growth. Princeton University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu D, Johnson S, Robinson J (2001) The colonial origins of comparative development: an empirical investigation. Am Econ Rev 91(5):1369–1401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acs Z, Sanders M (2011) Patents, knowledge spillovers and entrepreneurship. Small Bus Econ 34(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-011-9322-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acs Z, Audretsch D, Braunerhjelm P, Carlsson B (2009) The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Bus Econ 32(1):15–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aghion P, Howitt P (1991) A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica 60(2):323–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aghion P, Caroli E, Garcia-Penalosa C (1999) Inequality and economic growth: the perspective of new growth theories. J Econ Lit 37(4):1615–1660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anselin L, Varga A, Acs Z (1997) Local geographic spillovers between university research and high technology innovations. J Urban Econ 42(3):422–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch D, Lehmann E (2005) Does the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship hold for regions? Res Policy 34(8):1191–1202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch D, Sanders M (2011) Technological innovation, entrepreneurship and development. In: Szirmai E, Naude W, Goedhuys M (eds) Entrepreneurship, innovation and economic development. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 35–64

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin R, Forslid R (2000) The core-periphery model and endogenous growth: stabilizing and destabilizing integration. Economica 67(267):307–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro R (1996) Democracy and growth. J Econ Growth 1(1):1–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro R, Sala-I-Martin X (2004) Economic growth, 2nd edn. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol W (1990) Entrepreneurship: productive, unproductive and destructive. J Polit Econ 98(5):893–921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker G (1964) Human capital. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • de Groot H, Poot J, Smit M (2009) Agglomeration externalities, innovation and regional growth: theoretical perspectives and meta-analysis. In: Capello R, Nijkamp P (eds) Handbook of regional growth and development theories. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 256–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Desai S, Acs ZJ, Weitzel U (2013) A model of destructive entrepreneurship: insight for conflict and postconflict recovery. J Confl Resolut 57(1):20–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellison G, Glaeser E (1999) The geographic concentration of industry: does natural advantage explain agglomeration? Am Econ Assoc Papers Proc 89(2):311–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman M, Audretsch D (1999) Innovation in cities: science based diversity, specialization and localized competition. Eur Econ Rev 43(2):409–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florida R (2005) Cities and the creative class. Routledge, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Giesen C, Südekum J (2011) Zipf’s law for cities in the regions and the country. J Econ Geogr 11(4):667–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser E, Kallal H, Scheinkman J, Schleifer A (1992) Growth in cities. J Polit Econ 100(6):1126–1152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman G, Helpman E (1991a) Innovation and growth in the global economy. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman G, Helpman E (1991b) Endogenous product cycles. Econ J 101(409):1214–1229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson V (2006) In: Aghion P, Durlauf S (eds) Urbanization and growth. Handbook of economic growth. Elsevier-NorthHolland, New York, pp 1543–1591

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones CI (1995) R & D-based models of economic growth. J Polit Econ 103(4):759–784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman P (1991) Increasing returns and economic geography. J Polit Econ 99(3):483–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas R (1988) On the mechanics of economic development. J Monet Econ 22(1):3–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer P (1990) Endogenous technological change. J Polit Econ 98(5):S71–S102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders M, Weitzel U (2013) Misallocation of entrepreneurial talent in postconflict environments. J Confl Resolut 57(1):41–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solow R (1957) Technical change and the aggregate production function. Rev Econ Stat 39(3):312–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Temple J (1999) The new growth evidence. J Econ Lit 37(1):112–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark Sanders .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Acs, Z., Sanders, M. (2019). Endogenous Growth Theory and Regional Extensions. In: Fischer, M., Nijkamp, P. (eds) Handbook of Regional Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36203-3_13-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36203-3_13-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-36203-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-36203-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics