Skip to main content

Framing Effects: Behavioral Dynamics and Neural Basis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Neuroeconomics

Abstract

Research on framing effects has been one of few multidisciplinary endeavors joined by psychologists, economists, political scientists, and management and marketing researchers. Framing effects epitomize the power of linguistic subtlety in regulating decision-making, showing that different ways of framing, phrasing, or presenting virtually identical choice options systematically affect risk preference, evaluation of experience, and persuasiveness of messages. Given its central role in the studies of decision biases, the framing effect has been used as an experimental probe for understanding general mechanisms of human judgment and decision-making. Researchers have proposed various models explaining the framing effect. However, it was not until recently that research of framing effects started to focus more on psychological mechanisms above and beyond phenomenology. We conducted a meta-analysis of neural correlates of framing effects. The topographic convergences from a total of 26 foci found in the fMRI studies of framing effects revealed two key brain areas underlying framing effects: the left anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and the right inferior frontal gyrus (IFG). Together with behavioral findings, these results suggest that valence framing as a secondary cue becomes most salient and effective when primary contextual or social cues are absent or incongruent. The processing of choice problems under these conditions call for an ambiguity-reducing and conflict-monitoring function, which would result in the ACC activation. Second, the right IFG activation suggests that the nature of valence framing is both semantic and hedonic, involving not only verbatim linguistic analysis, but also interpretation of its affective tones and metaphorical implications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aron AR, Fletcher PC, Bullmore ET, Sahakian BJ, Robbins TW (2003) Stop-signal inhibition disrupted by damage to right inferior frontal gyrus in humans. Nat Neurosci 6:115–116

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Aron AR, Robbins T, Poldrack R (2004) Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex. Trends Cogn Sci 8:170–177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Asahi S, Okamoto Y, Okada G, Yamawaki S, Yokota N (2004) Negative correlation between right prefrontal activity during response inhibition and impulsiveness: an fMRI study. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 254:245–251

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bless H, Betsch T, Franzen A (1998) Framing the framing effect: the impact of context cues on solutions to the “Asian disease” problem. Euro J Soc Psychol 28:287–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloomfield AN (2006) Group size and the framing effect: treats to human beings and animals. Mem Cogn 34:929–937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloomfield AN, Sager JA, Bartels DM, Medin DL (2006) Caring about framing effects. Mind Soc 5:123–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohm P, Lind H (1992) A note on the robustness of a classical framing result. J Econ Psychol 13:355–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Botvinick MM (2007) Conflict monitoring and decision making: Reconciling two perspectives on anterior cingulate function. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 7:356–366

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Botvinick MM, Cohen JD, Carter CS (2004) Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: an update. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8:539–546

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Breiter HC, Aharon H, Kahneman D, Dale A, Shizgal P (2001) Functional imaging of neural responses to expectancy and experience of monetary gains and losses. Neuron 30:619–639

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cendri A, Hutcherson CA, Plassmann H, Gross JJ, Rangel A (2012) Cognitive regulation during decision making shifts behavioral control between ventromedial and dorsolateral prefrontal value systems. J Neurosci 32:13543–13554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang CJ, Yen SH, Duh RR (2002) An empirical investigation of competing theories to explain the framing effect in accounting-related decision. Behav Res Acc 14:35–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chikazoe J, Konishi S, Asari T, Jimura K, Miyashita Y (2007) Activation of right inferior frontal gyrus during response inhibition across response modalities. J Cogn Neurosci Arch 19:69–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chong D, Druckman J (2007) Framing theory. Annu Rev Polit Sci 10:103–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christopoulos GI, Tobler PN, Bossaerts P, Dolan RJ, Schultz W (2009) Neural correlates of value, risk, and risk aversion contributing to decision making under risk. J Neurosci 29:12574–12583

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen NJ, Eichenbaum HE (1993) Memory, amnesia, and the hippocampal system. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • De Martino B, Kumaran D, Seymour B, Dolan RJ (2006) Frames, biases, and rational decision-making in the human brain. Science 313:684–687

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Druckman JN (2001) On the limits of framing effects: Who can frame? J Polit 63:1041–1066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunegan KJ (1993) Framing, cognitive modes, and image theory: toward an understanding of a glass half full. J Appl Psychol 78:491–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eickhoff SB, Laird AR, Grefkes C, Wang LE, Zilles K, Fox PT (2009) Coordinate-based activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis of neuroimaging data: a random-effects approach based on empirical estimates of spatial uncertainty. Hum Brain Mapp 30:2907–2926

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fagley NS, Miller PM (1987) The effects of decision framing on choice of risky vs. certain options. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 39:264–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fagley NS, Miller PM (1990) The effect of framing on choice: interactions with risk-taking propensity, cognitive style, and sex. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 16:496–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fagley NS, Miller PM (1997) Framing effects and arenas of choice: your money or your life? Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 71:355–373

    Google Scholar 

  • Genovese CR, Lazar NA, Nichols TE (2002) Thresholding of statistical maps in functional neuroimaging using the false discovery rate. NeuroImage 15:870–878

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer G, Hoffrage U, Kleinbölting H (1991) Probabilistic mental models: a Brunswikian theory of confidence. Psychol Rev 98:506–528

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez C, Dana J, Koshino H, Just M (2005) The framing effect and risky decisions: examining cognitive functions with fMRI. J Econ Psychol 26:1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guitart-Masip M, Talmi D, Dolan R (2010) Conditioned associations and economic decision biases. NeuroImage 53:206–214

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Holroyd CB, Nieuwenhuis S, Mars RB, Coles MGH (2004) Anterior cingulate cortex, selection for action, and error processing. In Posner MI (ed) Cognitive neuroscience of attention. Guilford Press, New York, pp 219–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Honey GD, Fu CH, Kim J et al (2002) Effects of verbal working memory load on corticocortical connectivity modeled by path analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging data. NeuroImage 17:573–582

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jung-Beeman M (2005) Bilateral brain processes for comprehending natural language. Trends Cogn Sci 9:512–518

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D, Frederick S (2006) Frames and brains: elicitation and control of response tendencies. Trends Cogn Sci 11:45–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory. Econometrica 47:263–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kringelbach ML, Rolls ET (2004) The functional neuroanatomy of the human orbitofrontal cortex: evidence from neuroimaging and neuropsychology. Prog Neurobiol 72:341–372

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kühberger A (1995) The framing of decisions: a new look at old problems. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 62:230–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kühberger A (1998) The influence of framing on risky decisions: a meta-analysis. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 75:23–55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kühberger A, Schulte-Mecklenbeck M, Perner J (1999) The effects of framing, reflection, probability, and payoff on risk preference in choice tasks. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 78:204–231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kuo FY, Hsu CW, Day RF (2009) An exploratory study of cognitive effort involved in decision under Framing-an application of the eye-tracking technology. Decis Support Syst 48:81–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeBoeuf RA, Shafir E (2003) Deep thoughts and shallow frames: on the susceptibility to framing effects. J Behav Decis Mak 16:77–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin IP, Chapman DP (1990) Risk taking, frame of reference, and characterization of victim groups in AIDS treatment decisions. J Exp Soc Psychol 26:421–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin IP, Gaeth GJ (1988) Framing of attribute information before and after consuming the product. J Consum Res 15:374–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin IP, Schneider S, Gaeth GJ (1998) All frames are not created equal: a typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 76:149–188

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McElroy T, Seta J (2003) Framing effects: an analytic-holistic perspective. J Exp Soc Psychol 39:610–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McElroy T, Seta JJ (2004) On the other hand Am I rational? Hemispheric activation and the farming effect. Brain Cogn 55:572–580

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meyerowitz BE, Chaiken S (1987) The effect of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes, intentions, and behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol 52:500–510

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller PM, Fagley NS (1991) The effects of framing, problem variations, and providing rationale on choice. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 17:517–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montague PR, Berns GS (2002) Neural economics and the biological substrates of valuation. Neuron 36:265–284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moscovitch M (1994) Cognitive resources and dual-task interference effects at retrieval in normal people: the role of the frontal lobes and medial temporal cortex. Neuropsychology 8:524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Doherty J, Kringelbach ML, Rolls ET, Hornak J, Andrews C (2001) Abstract reward and punishment representations in the human orbitofrontal cortex. Nat Neurosci 4:95–102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Owen AM (1997) The functional organization of working memory processes within human lateral frontal cortex: the contribution of functional neuroimaging. Euro J Neurosci 9:1329–1339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne JW, Bettman JR, Johnson EJ (1993) The adaptive decision maker. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Piazza M, Izard V, Pinel P, Le Bihan D, Dehaene S (2004) Tuning curves for approximate numerosity in the human intraparietal sulcus. Neuron 44:547–555

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pinel P, Piazza M, Le Bihan D, Dehaene S (2004) Distributed and overlapping cerebral representations of number, size, and luminance during comparative judgments. Neuron 41:983–993

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rapp AM, Leube DT, Erb M, Grodd W, Kircher TTJ (2004) Neural correlates of metaphor processing. Cogn Brain Res 20:395–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reyna VF, Brainerd CJ (1991) Fuzzy-trace theory and framing effects in choice: Gist extraction, truncation, and conversion. J Behav Decis Mak 4:249–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reyna VF, Brainerd CJ (1995) Fuzzy-trace theory: an interim synthesis. Learn Individ Differ 7:1–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reyna VF, Brainerd CJ (2011) Dual processes in decision making and developmental neuroscience: a fuzzy-trace model. Dev Rev 31:180–206

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Roiser JP, De Martino B, Tan GCY, Kumaran D, Seymour B, Wood NW, Dolan R (2009) A genetically mediated bias in decision making driven by failure of amygdala control. J Neurosci 29:5985–5991

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Shimizu K, Udagawa D (2011a) A re-examination of the effect of contextual group size on people’s attitude to risk. Judgment and Decision Making 6:156–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimizu K, Udagawa D (2011b) How can group experience influence the cue priority? A re-examination of the ambiguity-ambivalence hypothesis. Front Evol Psychol 2:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Sieck W, Yates JF (1997) Exposition effects on decision making: choice and confidence in choice. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 70:207–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokol-Hessner P, Hutcherson C, Hare T, Rangel A (2012) Decision value computations adjust to the available decision time. Eur J Neurosci 35:1065–1074

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich KE, West RF (1998) Individual differences in framing and conjunction effects. Think Reason 4:289–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takemura K (1994) Influence of elaboration on the framing of decision. J Psychol 128:33–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talmi D, Hurlemann R, Patin A, Dolan R (2010) Framing effect following bilateral amygdala lesion. Neuropsychologia 48:1823–1827

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Tom SM, Fox CR, Trepel C, Poldrack RA (2007) The neural basis of loss aversion in decision making under risk. Science 315:515–518

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tulving E, Kapur S, Craik FIM, Markowitsch HJ, Houle S (1994) Hemispheric encoding/retrieval asymmetry in episodic memory: positron emission tomography findings. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:2016–2020

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Turkeltaub PE, Eden GF, Jones KM, Zeffiro TA (2002) Meta-analysis of the functional neuroanatomy of single-word reading: method and validation. Neuroimage 16:765–780

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky A, Kahneman D (1981) The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211:453–458

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang XT (1996a) Framing effects: Dynamics and task domains. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 68:145–157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang XT (1996b) Domain-specific rationality in human choices: violations of utility axioms and social contexts. Cognition 60:31–63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang XT (2008) Risk communication and risky choice in context: ambiguity and ambivalence hypothesis. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1128:78–89

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang XT, Johnson GJ (2012) A tri-reference point theory of decision making under risk. J Exp Psychol Gen 141:743–756

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang XT, Johnston V (1995) Perceived social context and risk preference: a re-examination of framing effects in a life-death decision problem. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 8:279–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang XT, Simons F, Brédart S (2001) Social cues and verbal framing in risky choice. J Behav Decis Mak 14:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitney P, Rinehart CA, Hinson JM (2008) Framing effects under cognitive load: The role of working memory in risky decisions. Psychon Bull Rev 15:1179–1184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Miao D (2008) Social cues and framing effects in risky decisions among Chinese military students. Asian J Soc Psychol 11:241–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng H, Wang XT, Zhu L (2010) Framing effects: behavioral dynamics and neural basis. Neuropsychologia 48:3198–3204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was partially supported by National Science Foundation (NSF) Grant SES-1123341, and a research fund from the Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences to the first author, and a research fund (No. Y2CQ043005) from the Institute of Psychology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences to the second author. We thank Steven Garelik for his helpful comments on an earlier version of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiao-Tian Wang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wang, XT., Rao, L., Zheng, H. (2016). Framing Effects: Behavioral Dynamics and Neural Basis. In: Reuter, M., Montag, C. (eds) Neuroeconomics. Studies in Neuroscience, Psychology and Behavioral Economics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35923-1_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics