Skip to main content

Using Conceptual Structures in the Design of Computer-Based Assessment Software

  • Conference paper
Conceptual Structures for STEM Research and Education (ICCS 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 7735))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper discusses the use of conceptual structures in the design of computer-based assessment (CBA) tools for e-assessment of programming exercises. In STEM (science, technology, engineering and maths) subjects, universities often observe high dropout and failure rates among the first year students. There are a number of research initiatives that investigate the use of interactive teaching methods and e-learning technologies for improving STEM education. This paper presents a conceptual model of programming exercises and discusses more generally how conceptual structures can be employed for the implementation of CBA tools.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ben-Ari, M.: Constructivism in computer science education. SIGCSE Bull. 30(1), 257–261 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Conway, M.A., Cohen, G., Stanhope, N.: Very long-term memory for knowledge acquired at school and university. Applied Cognitive Psychology 6, 467–482 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hake, R.R.: Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics 66(1), 64–74 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hestenes, D., Wells, M., Swackhamer, G.: Force Concept Inventory. Phys. Teach. 30, 141–158 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kortemeyer, G.: The Evolving Growth of LON-CAPA. Campus Technology (March 10, 2006), http://campustechnology.com/articles/2006/10/the-evolving-growth-of-loncapa.aspx

  6. Leron, U., Dubinsky, E.: An Abstract Algebra Story. The American Mathematical Monthly 102(3), 227–242 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Levy, R.: Peirce’s Theory of Learning. Educational Theory 2, 151–176 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mazur, E.: Peer Instruction: A User’s Manual. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  9. McDermott, L.C.: Oersted Medal Lecture 2001: Physics Education Research-The Key to Student Learning. American Journal of Physics 69(11), 1127–1137 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pears, A., Seidman, S., Malmi, L., Mannila, L., Adams, E., Bennedsen, J., Devlin, M., Paterson, J.: A Survey of Literature on the Teaching of Introductory Programming. SIGCSE Bull. 39(4), 204–223 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Prediger, S.: How to develop mathematics-for-teaching and for understanding: the case of meanings of the equal sign. J. Math. Teacher Educ. 13, 73–93 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Priss, U., Riegler, P., Jensen, N.: Using FCA for Modelling Conceptual Difficulties in Learning Processes. In: Domenach, Ignatov, Poelmans (eds.) Contributions to the 10th International Conference on Formal Concept Analysis (ICFCA 2012), pp. 161–173 (2012a)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Priss, U., Jensen, N., Rod, O.: Software for E-Assessment of Programming Exercises. In: Goltz, et al. (eds.) Informatik 2012, Proceedings of the 42. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Informatik, GI-Edition, Lecture Notes in Informatics, p. 208, pp. 1786–1791 (2012b)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pundak, D., Herscovitz, O., Shacham, M., Wiser-Biton, R.: Instructors’ Attitudes toward Active Learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects 5, 215–232 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rey-Lopez, M., Brusilovsky, P., Meccawy, M., Diaz-Redondo, R., Fernandez-Vilas, A., Ashman, H.: Resolving the Problem of Intelligent Learning Content in Learning Management Systems. International Journal on E-Learning 7(3), 363–381 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rongas, T., Kaarna, A., Kalviainen, H.: Classification of Computerized Learning Tools for Introductory Programming Courses: Learning Approach. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2004), pp. 678–680. IEEE Computer Society (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Russell, G., Cummings, A.: Online Assessment and Checking of SQL: Detecting and Preventing Plagiarism. In: 3rd Workshop on Teaching Learning and Assessment in Databases (TLAD 2005). HEA-ICS, pp. 46–50 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tall, D.: Cognitive Conflict and the Learning of Mathematics. In: First Conference of The International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education at Utrecht, Netherlands (1977)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Priss, U., Jensen, N., Rod, O. (2013). Using Conceptual Structures in the Design of Computer-Based Assessment Software. In: Pfeiffer, H.D., Ignatov, D.I., Poelmans, J., Gadiraju, N. (eds) Conceptual Structures for STEM Research and Education. ICCS 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7735. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35786-2_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35786-2_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-35785-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-35786-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics