Abstract
This chapter will explore the ways in which voluntary standards for sustainability can shape urban and community development. It is argued that a flexible approach to identifying, implementing and amending standards for sustainable cities and communities will optimise both democratic participation and social learning while recognising that technological, bureaucratic and other interventions, although important, are by no means sufficient for ensuring liveable and ecologically sensitive communities to grow. Two specific guidance schemes exemplify this contention: first, the guidance for community sustainable development (BS8904) recently published by the British Standards Institute; and second, the stages, ‘ingredients’ and principles that have emerged from within the Transition Movement in the UK and elsewhere. Moving on, Sect. 25.2 outlines the demographic, social, political as well as environment context of urban growth and development in the first half of this century. Section 25.3 will interrogate the concept of risk and resilience as it is applied and developed in sustainable community development making key reference to the debates on risk and vulnerability and the ways in which the community based Transition Movement practically engage with them. Section 25.4 examines the relationship between sustainable community and liveability, particularly as this pertains to health. Section 25.5 shows how the design, moral ownership and commitment to voluntary standards may secure a sense of obligation sometimes understood as being an informal social contract. Section 25.6 examines the ideas, suggestions and prescriptions of BS8904. Finally, Section 25.7 offers some tentative conclusions and recommendations the main one being, the necessity for standards to be a stimulus for continuing social learning and creativity in practice avoiding the restrictions and limitations imposed of a managerialist culture that sees a standard as a box that must be ticked.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adger NW (2000) Social and ecological resilience: are they related? Prog Hum Geogr 24(3):347–364
Agyeman J, Bullard RD, Evans B (2002) Exploring the nexus: bringing together sustainability, environmental justice and equity. Space Polity 6(1):77–90
Barr S, Gilg A, Shaw G (2011) Helping people make better choices: exploring the behaviour change agenda for environmental sustainability. Appl Geogr 31(2):712–720
Bauman Z (2001) Community: seeking safety in an insecure world. Polity Press, Cambridge
Beck U (1992) The risk society: towards a new modernity. Sage, London
Bourdieu P (2005) Habitus. In: Hillier J, Rooksby E (eds) Habitus: a sense of place. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp 43–49
Brenner N, Marcuse P, Mayer M (2012) Cities for people, not for profit. Routledge, London
Bridger JC, Luloff AE (2001) Building the sustainable community: is social capital the answer? Sociol Inq 71(4):458–472
British Standards Institute (2012) BS 8904 – guidance for sustainable community development. BSI, London
Cole RJ (2012) Transitioning from green to regenerative design. Build Res Inf 40(1):39–53
Custot J, Dubbeling M, Getz-Escudero A, Padgham J, Tuts R, Wabbes S (2012) Resilient food systems for resilient cities. In: Otto-Zimmerman K (ed) Resilient cities 2. ICLEI/Springer, Bonn, pp 125–137
Deakin M (2011) Meeting the challenge of learning from what works in the development of sustainable communities. Sustain Cities Soc 1(4):244–251
Dean M (1999) Governmentality: power and rule in modern society. Sage, London
Department for Communities and Local Government (2003) Sustainable communities: building for the future. TSO, London
Department for Communities and Local Government (2008) The code for sustainable homes: setting the standard in sustainability for new homes. TSO, London
Department of Communities and Local Government (2012) Historic powers in the Localism Act pass down to communities. Public announcement. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/historic-powers-in-the-localism-act-pass-down-to-communities--2. Accessed 31 Aug 2013
Folke C, Carpenter S, Elmqvist T, Gunderson L, Holling CS, Walker B (2002) Resilience and sustainable development: building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. Ambio 31(5):437–440
Frumkin H (2003) Healthy places: exploring the evidence. Am J Public Health 93(9):1451–1456
Hopkins R (2008) The transition town handbook: from oil dependency to local resilience. Free edit version. http://www.transitie.be/userfiles//transition-handbook(1).pdf. Accessed 31 Aug 2013
Hopkins R (2011) The Transition companion. Transition/Green Books, Totnes
Housing Corporation (2007) Design and quality standards. Housing Corporation, London
ICLEI Briefing Sheet (2011) Towards urban resilience. May. http://www.iclei.org/fileadmin/user_upload/documents/Global/News_Items/Image_Documents_web_news_11/Briefing_Sheet_Urban_Resilience_20110616.pdf. Accessed 16 Aug 2012
Innes JE, Booher DE (2000) Indicators for sustainable communities: a strategy building on complexity theory and distributed intelligence. Plan Theor Pract 1(2):173–186
Jensen JO, Elle M (2007) Exploring the use of tools for urban sustainability in European cities. Indoor Built Environ 16(3):235–247
Marton-Lefevre J (2012) Nature at the heart of urban design for resilience. In: Otto-Zimmerman K (ed) Resilient cities 2. ICLEI/Springer, Bonn, pp 113–118
Massey D (2003) The responsibilities of place. Local Econ 19(2):97–101
Massey D (2004) Geographies of responsibility. Geogr Ann Ser B 86(1):5–18
Newman P, Beatley T, Boyer H (2009) Resilient cities: responding to peak oil and climate change. Island Press, Washington
Power A (2004) Sustainable communities and sustainable development: a review of the sustainable communities plan. ESRC/CASE/SDC, London
Rees W, Wackernagel M (1996) Urban ecological footprints: why cities cannot be sustainable – and why they are a key to sustainability. Environ Impact Assess Rev 16(4–6):223–248
Salmon G (2002) Voluntary Sustainability Standards and Labels (VSSLs): the case for fostering them. Background paper for the OECD round table on sustainable development
Scott Cato M, Hillier J (2010) How could we study climate-related social innovation? Applying Deleuzean philosophy to transition towns. Environ Polit 19(6):869–887
UN Habitat (2008) State of the world’s cities 2010/2011: bridging the urban divide. Earthscan, London
United Nations (2012) World urbanization prospects: the 2011 revision. United Nations, New York. http://esa.un.org/unup/pdf/WUP2011_Highlights.pdf. Accessed 31 Aug 2013
Wilkinson R, Pickett K (2010) The spirit level: why equality is better for everyone. Penguin Books, London
World Bank (2010) Cities and climate change: an urgent agenda. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank, Washington
Young Foundation (2008) Local wellbeing: can we measure it? http://youngfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Local-Wellbeing-Can-we-Measure-it-September-2008.pdf. Accessed 31 Aug 2013
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Blewitt, J. (2014). Voluntary Standards and Approaches for Sustainable Communities. In: Schmitz-Hoffmann, C., Schmidt, M., Hansmann, B., Palekhov, D. (eds) Voluntary Standard Systems. Natural Resource Management in Transition, vol 1. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35716-9_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35716-9_25
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-35715-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-35716-9
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawLaw and Criminology (R0)