Skip to main content

Voluntary Standards and Approaches for Sustainable Communities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Voluntary Standard Systems

Part of the book series: Natural Resource Management in Transition ((NRMT,volume 1))

  • 985 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter will explore the ways in which voluntary standards for sustainability can shape urban and community development. It is argued that a flexible approach to identifying, implementing and amending standards for sustainable cities and communities will optimise both democratic participation and social learning while recognising that technological, bureaucratic and other interventions, although important, are by no means sufficient for ensuring liveable and ecologically sensitive communities to grow. Two specific guidance schemes exemplify this contention: first, the guidance for community sustainable development (BS8904) recently published by the British Standards Institute; and second, the stages, ‘ingredients’ and principles that have emerged from within the Transition Movement in the UK and elsewhere. Moving on, Sect. 25.2 outlines the demographic, social, political as well as environment context of urban growth and development in the first half of this century. Section 25.3 will interrogate the concept of risk and resilience as it is applied and developed in sustainable community development making key reference to the debates on risk and vulnerability and the ways in which the community based Transition Movement practically engage with them. Section 25.4 examines the relationship between sustainable community and liveability, particularly as this pertains to health. Section 25.5 shows how the design, moral ownership and commitment to voluntary standards may secure a sense of obligation sometimes understood as being an informal social contract. Section 25.6 examines the ideas, suggestions and prescriptions of BS8904. Finally, Section 25.7 offers some tentative conclusions and recommendations the main one being, the necessity for standards to be a stimulus for continuing social learning and creativity in practice avoiding the restrictions and limitations imposed of a managerialist culture that sees a standard as a box that must be ticked.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adger NW (2000) Social and ecological resilience: are they related? Prog Hum Geogr 24(3):347–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agyeman J, Bullard RD, Evans B (2002) Exploring the nexus: bringing together sustainability, environmental justice and equity. Space Polity 6(1):77–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barr S, Gilg A, Shaw G (2011) Helping people make better choices: exploring the behaviour change agenda for environmental sustainability. Appl Geogr 31(2):712–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauman Z (2001) Community: seeking safety in an insecure world. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck U (1992) The risk society: towards a new modernity. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu P (2005) Habitus. In: Hillier J, Rooksby E (eds) Habitus: a sense of place. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp 43–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner N, Marcuse P, Mayer M (2012) Cities for people, not for profit. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridger JC, Luloff AE (2001) Building the sustainable community: is social capital the answer? Sociol Inq 71(4):458–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • British Standards Institute (2012) BS 8904 – guidance for sustainable community development. BSI, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole RJ (2012) Transitioning from green to regenerative design. Build Res Inf 40(1):39–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Custot J, Dubbeling M, Getz-Escudero A, Padgham J, Tuts R, Wabbes S (2012) Resilient food systems for resilient cities. In: Otto-Zimmerman K (ed) Resilient cities 2. ICLEI/Springer, Bonn, pp 125–137

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Deakin M (2011) Meeting the challenge of learning from what works in the development of sustainable communities. Sustain Cities Soc 1(4):244–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean M (1999) Governmentality: power and rule in modern society. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Communities and Local Government (2003) Sustainable communities: building for the future. TSO, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Communities and Local Government (2008) The code for sustainable homes: setting the standard in sustainability for new homes. TSO, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Communities and Local Government (2012) Historic powers in the Localism Act pass down to communities. Public announcement. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/historic-powers-in-the-localism-act-pass-down-to-communities--2. Accessed 31 Aug 2013

  • Folke C, Carpenter S, Elmqvist T, Gunderson L, Holling CS, Walker B (2002) Resilience and sustainable development: building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. Ambio 31(5):437–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Frumkin H (2003) Healthy places: exploring the evidence. Am J Public Health 93(9):1451–1456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins R (2008) The transition town handbook: from oil dependency to local resilience. Free edit version. http://www.transitie.be/userfiles//transition-handbook(1).pdf. Accessed 31 Aug 2013

  • Hopkins R (2011) The Transition companion. Transition/Green Books, Totnes

    Google Scholar 

  • Housing Corporation (2007) Design and quality standards. Housing Corporation, London

    Google Scholar 

  • ICLEI Briefing Sheet (2011) Towards urban resilience. May. http://www.iclei.org/fileadmin/user_upload/documents/Global/News_Items/Image_Documents_web_news_11/Briefing_Sheet_Urban_Resilience_20110616.pdf. Accessed 16 Aug 2012

  • Innes JE, Booher DE (2000) Indicators for sustainable communities: a strategy building on complexity theory and distributed intelligence. Plan Theor Pract 1(2):173–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen JO, Elle M (2007) Exploring the use of tools for urban sustainability in European cities. Indoor Built Environ 16(3):235–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marton-Lefevre J (2012) Nature at the heart of urban design for resilience. In: Otto-Zimmerman K (ed) Resilient cities 2. ICLEI/Springer, Bonn, pp 113–118

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Massey D (2003) The responsibilities of place. Local Econ 19(2):97–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey D (2004) Geographies of responsibility. Geogr Ann Ser B 86(1):5–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman P, Beatley T, Boyer H (2009) Resilient cities: responding to peak oil and climate change. Island Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Power A (2004) Sustainable communities and sustainable development: a review of the sustainable communities plan. ESRC/CASE/SDC, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees W, Wackernagel M (1996) Urban ecological footprints: why cities cannot be sustainable – and why they are a key to sustainability. Environ Impact Assess Rev 16(4–6):223–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmon G (2002) Voluntary Sustainability Standards and Labels (VSSLs): the case for fostering them. Background paper for the OECD round table on sustainable development

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott Cato M, Hillier J (2010) How could we study climate-related social innovation? Applying Deleuzean philosophy to transition towns. Environ Polit 19(6):869–887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UN Habitat (2008) State of the world’s cities 2010/2011: bridging the urban divide. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2012) World urbanization prospects: the 2011 revision. United Nations, New York. http://esa.un.org/unup/pdf/WUP2011_Highlights.pdf. Accessed 31 Aug 2013

  • Wilkinson R, Pickett K (2010) The spirit level: why equality is better for everyone. Penguin Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2010) Cities and climate change: an urgent agenda. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Young Foundation (2008) Local wellbeing: can we measure it? http://youngfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Local-Wellbeing-Can-we-Measure-it-September-2008.pdf. Accessed 31 Aug 2013

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Blewitt .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Blewitt, J. (2014). Voluntary Standards and Approaches for Sustainable Communities. In: Schmitz-Hoffmann, C., Schmidt, M., Hansmann, B., Palekhov, D. (eds) Voluntary Standard Systems. Natural Resource Management in Transition, vol 1. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35716-9_25

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics