Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The United States of America: Unfounded Fears of Press Subsidies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
State Aid for Newspapers

Part of the book series: Media Business and Innovation ((MEDIA))

Abstract

One of the central assumptions of US political discourse is that state-funded media subsidies are deeply antithetical to American values, and democratic practice generally. This assumption is rarely challenged, though a good deal of historical evidence gives us reason to doubt it. Not only are various media subsidies firmly established in American traditions, but the historical record shows that both in the USA and across the globe, press subsidies are compatible with democratic self-governance. Still, misconceptions about subsidies abound in the USA and continue to impede rational debates about an important policy option—an option that might be the last remaining systemic alternative to the failing model of ad revenue-supported journalism. The following chapter provides a brief overview of past and present American press subsidies. Drawing from historical and international research, the chapter sketches a political economic rationale for subsidizing media and concludes with some suggestions for future policy trajectories.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    I thank Alex Williams for his research assistance with this section.

References

  • Audit Bureau of Circulations. (2012, September). The top U.S. newspapers for September 2012. Accessed February 2, 2013, from http://accessabc.wordpress.com/2012/10/30/the-top-u-s-newspapers-for-september-2012/

  • Baines, D. (2013). United Kingdom: Subsidies and democratic deficits in local news. In P. Murschetz (Ed.), State aid for newspapers. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, C. E. (2011). Testimony before the subcommittee on courts and competition policy, committee on the judiciary, house of representatives, congress of the United States, a new age for newspapers, diversity of voices, competition, and the internet. In R. McChesney & V. Pickard (Eds.), Will the last reporter please turn out the lights: The collapse of journalism and what can be done to fix it (pp. 128–130). New York, NY: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bator, F. M. (1958). The anatomy of market failure. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 72(3), 351–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benson, R. (2010). What makes for a critical press: A case study of U.S. and French immigration news coverage. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 15, 3–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benson, R. (2011). Public funding and journalistic independence: What does research tell us? In R. McChesney & V. Pickard (Eds.), Will the last reporter please turn out the lights: The collapse of journalism and what can be done to fix it (pp. 314–319). New York, NY: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, R., & Hallin, D. (2007). How states, markets and globalization shape the news: The French and U.S. national press, 1965–97. European Journal of Communication, 22(1), 27–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benson, R., & Powers, M. (2011). Public media and political independence: Lessons for the future of journalism from around the world. Washington, DC: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, M. (2011). The future of journalism: Addressing pervasive market failure with public policy. In R. McChesney & V. Pickard (Eds.), Will the last reporter please turn out the lights: The collapse of journalism and what can be done to fix it (pp. 320–339). New York, NY: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, G., & Westphal, D. (2011). The Washington-Madison solution. In R. McChesney & V. Pickard (Eds.), Will the last reporter please turn out the lights: The collapse of journalism and what can be done to fix it (pp. 133–337). New York, NY: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curran, J. (2010). Future of journalism. Journalism Studies, 11(4), 464–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curran, J., Iyengar, S., Lund, A. B., & Salovaara-Moring, I. (2009). Media system, public knowledge and democracy. European Journal of Communication, 24, 5–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downie, L., & Schudson, M. (2011). The reconstruction of American journalism. In R. McChesney & V. Pickard (Eds.), Will the last reporter please turn out the lights: The collapse of journalism and what can be done to fix it (pp. 55–90). New York, NY: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmonds, R., Guskin, E., Rosenstiel, T., & Mitchell, A. (2012). Newspapers: By the numbers. The Pew research Center’s project for excellence in journalism: The state of the News media 2012. Accessed February 2, 2013, from http://stateofthemedia.org

  • Federal Trade Commission. (2010). Potential policy recommendations to support the reinvention of journalism (discussion draft). Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, E. P. (2002). Bargains in the information marketplace: The use of government subsidies to regulate new media. Journal of Telecommunications and High Technology Law, 1, 217–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, B. (2012). A public press? Evaluating the viability of government subsidies for the newspaper industry. UCLA Entertainment Law Review, 19(1), 189–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenslade, R. (2009, March 27). Forget the Tories, let’s find a new business model to save local newspapers. The Guardian. Accessed February 2, 2013, from http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/greenslade/2009/mar/27/local-newspapers-trinity-mirror

  • Hadenius, S., & Weibull, L. (1999). The Swedish newspaper system in the late 1990s: Tradition and transition. Nordicom Review, 1, 129–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallin, D., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing media systems: Three models of media and politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, J. (2006). All the news that’s fit to sell. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • John, R. (1995). Spreading the news: The American postal system from Franklin to Morse. Cambridge, UK: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lennett, B., Glaisyer, T., & Meinrath, S. (2012). Public media, spectrum policy, and rethinking public interest obligations for the 21st century. Washington, DC: New America Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • McChesney, R., & Nichols, J. (2010). The death and life of American journalism: The media revolution that will begin the world again. New York, NY: Nation Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • McChesney, R., & Pickard, V. (Forthcoming). News media as political institutions. In K. Kenski & K. Hall Jamieson (Eds.), Handbook of political communication theories. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medema, S. G. (2007). The hesitant hand: Mill, Sidgwick, and the evolution of the theory of market failure. History of Political Economy, 39(3), 331–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murschetz, P. (1998). State support for the daily press in Europe: Austria, France, Norway and Sweden compared. European Journal of Communication, 13, 291–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, R. K., & Linnebank, G. (2011). Public support for the media: A six-country overview of direct and indirect subsidies. Accessed February 2, 2013, from http://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/publications/risj-reports.html

  • Nilikantan, R. (2010). Postal subsidies. Public policy & funding the news. Working Paper (Center on Communication Leadership & Policy, USC Annenberg School for Communications & Journalism). Accessed February 28, 2013, from http://fundingthenews.usc.edu/related_research/1_Carnegie_PostalSubsidies.pdf

  • Nordenson, B. (2007). The Uncle Sam solution: Can the government help the press? Should it? Columbia Journalism Review, 46(3), 37–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pew Research Center’s Project for Excellence in Journalism. (2010, January 11). The study of the news ecosystem of one American city. Accessed February 2, 2013, from http://www.journalism.org/analysis_report/how_news_happens

  • Pfanner, E. (2010, May 16). For U.S. newspaper industry, an example in Germany. The New York Times. Accessed February 2, 2013, from http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/17/business/media/17iht-cache17.html

  • Pickard, V. (2006). Assessing the radical democracy of Indymedia: Discursive, technical and institutional constructions. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 23(1), 19–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickard, V. (2010). Reopening the postwar settlement for U.S. media: The origins and implications of the social contract between media, the state, and the polity. Communication, Culture and Critique, 3, 170–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickard, V. (2011a). Revisiting the road not taken: A social democratic vision of the press. In R. McChesney & V. Pickard (Eds.), Will the last reporter please turn out the lights: The collapse of journalism and what can be done to fix it. New York, NY: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickard, V. (2011b). Can government support the press? Historicizing and internationalizing a policy approach to the journalism crisis. The Communication Review, 14(2), 73–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickard, V. (2013). Social democracy or corporate libertarianism? Conflicting media policy narratives in the wake of market failure. Communication Theory, 23(4), 336–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickard, V., Stearns, J., & Aaron, C. (2009). Saving the news: Toward a national journalism strategy. In Freepress (Ed.), Changing media: Public interest policies for the digital age (pp. 187–240). Washington, DC: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powers, S. (2011). U.S. international broadcasting: An untapped resource for ethnic and domestic news organizations. In R. McChesney & V. Pickard (Eds.), Will the last reporter please turn out the lights: The collapse of journalism and what can be done to fix it (pp. 138–150). New York, NY: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. (1954). The pure theory of public expenditure. Review of Economics and Statistics, 36, 387–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schizer, D. (2011). Subsidizing the press. Journal of Legal Analysis, 3(1), 1–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skogerbø, E. (1997). The press subsidy system in Norway: Controversial past – unpredictable future? European Journal of Communication, 12(1), 99–118. doi:10.1177/0267323197012001005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starr, P. (2004). Creation of the media. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starr, P. (2011). Goodbye to the age of newspapers (hello to a new era of corruption). In R. McChesney & V. Pickard (Eds.), Will the last reporter please turn out the lights: The collapse of journalism and what can be done to fix it (pp. 18–37). New York, NY: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. (1989). Markets, market failures, and development. American Economic Review, 79(2), 197–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Manship School of Mass Communication. (2004, March 20). News in the public interest: A free and subsidized press. The Breaux Symposium. Baton Rouge, LA: Manship School of Mass Communications, The Reilly Center for Media & Public Affairs. Accessed February 2, 2013, from http://uiswcmsweb.prod.lsu.edu/manship/ReillyCenter/files/item25405.pdf

  • Toynbee, P. (2009, March 24). This is an emergency. Act now, or local news will die. Accessed February 2, 2013, from http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/mar/24/regional-newspapers-lay-offs

  • Trogen, P. C. (2005). Public goods. In D. Robbins (Ed.), Handbook of public sector economics. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldman, S. (2011). The information needs of communities: The changing media landscape in a broadband age. Washington, DC: Federal Communications Commission. Accessed February 2, 2013, from http://www.fcc.gov/infoneedsreport.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weed, M. C. (2012, September 21). U.S. public diplomacy: Legislative proposals to amend prohibitions on disseminating materials to domestic audiences. Congressional Research Service. Accessed February 2, 2013, from http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/secrecy/R42754.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, 3620 Walnut Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA

    Victor Pickard

Authors
  1. Victor Pickard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Victor Pickard .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Salzburg ICT&S Center, Salzburg, Austria

    Paul Murschetz

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pickard, V. (2013). The United States of America: Unfounded Fears of Press Subsidies. In: Murschetz, P. (eds) State Aid for Newspapers. Media Business and Innovation. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35691-9_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation