Skip to main content

Benchmarking and Movement Preservation: Evidences from Real-Life and Simulated Series

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advances in Theoretical and Applied Statistics

Part of the book series: Studies in Theoretical and Applied Statistics ((STASSPSS))

  • 2759 Accesses

Abstract

The benchmarking problem arises when time series data for the same target variable are measured at different frequencies with different level of accuracy, and there is the need to remove discrepancies between annual benchmarks and corresponding sums of the sub-annual values. Two widely used benchmarking procedures are the modified Denton Proportionate First Differences (PFD) and the Causey and Trager Growth Rates Preservation (GRP) techniques. In the literature it is often claimed that the PFD procedure produces results very close to those obtained through the GRP procedure. In this chapter we study the conditions under which this result holds, by looking at an artificial and a real-life economic series, and by means of a simulation exercise.

The views expressed herein are those of the authors and should not be attributed to the IMF, its Executive Board, or its management

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Empirical comparisons between the Cholette–Dagum regression-based benchmarking approach, which can be seen [5] as a generalization of the seminal contribution by Denton [6], and the Causey and Trager approach, are shown in Titova et al. [10].

  2. 2.

    For a recent survey on this issue, see Di Fonzo and Marini [8].

  3. 3.

    The median is more representative than the mean in the case of atypical values. We also calculated mean, standard deviation, minimum, and range of r 1 and r 2, available on request from the authors.

  4. 4.

    When the preliminary series were used as starting values, in 50 out of 25,000 cases (0.2%) the GRP procedure produced benchmarked series with r 2 > 1.

  5. 5.

    The index r 1 is greater than one for 488 out of 25,000 series (1,95%). The highest number of cases with r 1 > 1 (270) is observed for (σ e , μ) = (5, 0), followed by 101 cases for (σ e , μ) = (10, 0). The remaining cases are: 50 for (σ e , μ) = (15, 0), 15 for (σ e , μ) = (20, 0), 4 for (σ e , μ) = (25, 0), 20 for (σ e , μ) = (5, 15), 15 for (σ e , μ) = (10, 15), 8 for (σ e , μ) = (15, 15), 2 for (σ e , μ) = (20, 15), and 3 for (σ e , μ) = (25, 15).

References

  1. Bloem, A., Dippelsman, R., Mæhle, N.: Quarterly National Accounts Manual. Concepts, Data Sources, and Compilation. International Monetary Fund, Washington D.C. (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bozik, J.E., Otto, M.C.: Benchmarking: Evaluating methods that preserve month-to-month changes. Bureau of the Census - Statistical Research Division, RR-88/07 (1988) http://www.census.gov/srd/papers/pdf/rr88-07.pdf

  3. Causey, B., Trager, M.L.: Derivation of Solution to the Benchmarking Problem: Trend Revision. Unpublished research notes, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington D.C. (1981). Available as an appendix in Bozik and Otto (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cholette, P.A.: Adjusting sub-annual series to yearly benchmarks. Surv. Meth. 10, 35–49 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dagum, E.B., Cholette, P.A.: Benchmarking, Temporal Distribution, and Reconciliation Methods for Time Series. Springer, New York (2006)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Denton, F.T.: Adjustment of monthly or quarterly series to annual totals: An approach based on quadratic minimization. JASA 333, 99–102 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Di Fonzo, T., Marini, M.: Simultaneous and two-step reconciliation of systems of time series: methodological and practical issues. JRSS C (Appl. Stat.) 60, 143–164 (2011a)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Di Fonzo, T., Marini, M.: A Newton’s Method for Benchmarking Time Series According to a Growth Rates Preservation Principle. Department of Statistical Sciences, University of Padua, Working Paper Series 17 (2011b). http://www.stat.unipd.it/ricerca/fulltext?wp=432

  9. Luenberger, D.G.: Linear and Nonlinear Programming. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1984)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Titova, N, Findley, D., Monsell, B.C.: Comparing the Causey-Trager method to the multiplicative Cholette-Dagum regression-based method of benchmarking sub-annual data to annual benchmarks. In: JSM Proceedings, Business and Economic Statistics Section. American Statistical Association, Alexandria, VA (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Trager, M.L.: Derivation of Solution to the Benchmarking Problem: Relative Revision. Unpublished research notes, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington D.C. (1982) Available as an appendix in Bozik and Otto (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  12. U.S. Census Bureau: X-12-ARIMA Reference manual, Version 0.3. U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington D.C. (2009). http://www.census.gov/srd/www/x12a/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tommaso Di Fonzo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix: Non-singularity of the Coefficient Matrix of System (45.2)

Appendix: Non-singularity of the Coefficient Matrix of System (45.2)

Luenberger [9, p. 424] shows that a unique solution to the problem

$$\displaystyle{\min _{\mathbf{y}}\mathbf{y}\prime\mathbf{Qy}\qquad \mbox{ subject to}\quad \mathbf{Cy} = \mathbf{Y}}$$

exists if the matrix C is of full rank, and the matrix Q is positive definite on the null space of matrix C: \(\mathcal{N}(\mathbf{C}) =\{ \mathbf{x} \in {\mathbb{R}}^{n} : \mathbf{Cx} = \mathbf{0}\}\).

Let us consider the matrix \(\mathbf{Q} ={ \mathbf{P}}^{-1}\boldsymbol{\Delta }^{\prime}_{n}\boldsymbol{\Delta }_{n}{\mathbf{P}}^{-1}\), and let the vector y belong to \(\mathcal{N}\)(C). We assume p t ≠0, t = 1, …, n (otherwise the objective function is not defined), and Cp≠Y, which corresponds to exclude the trivial solution y  ∗  = p, valid when there is no benchmarking problem. Given that

$$\displaystyle{\mathbf{y}\prime\mathbf{Qy} =\sum _{ t=2}^{n}{\left (\frac{y_{t}} {p_{t}} -\frac{y_{t-1}} {p_{t-1}}\right )}^{2},}$$

it is immediately recognized that the expression above is strictly positive, which means that matrix \(\mathbf{Q} ={ \mathbf{P}}^{-1}\boldsymbol{\Delta }^{\prime}_{n}\boldsymbol{\Delta }_{n}{\mathbf{P}}^{-1}\) is positive definite on the null space spanned by the columns of matrix C, and thus the coefficient matrix of system (45.2) is nonsingular.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fonzo, T.D., Marini, M. (2013). Benchmarking and Movement Preservation: Evidences from Real-Life and Simulated Series. In: Torelli, N., Pesarin, F., Bar-Hen, A. (eds) Advances in Theoretical and Applied Statistics. Studies in Theoretical and Applied Statistics(). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35588-2_45

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics