Skip to main content

On the Variants of Tagged Geometric History Length Branch Predictors

  • Conference paper
Advances in Intelligent Systems and Applications - Volume 2

Part of the book series: Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies ((SIST,volume 21))

  • 2924 Accesses

Abstract

With the incessant pursuit for high performance, cost effective and power efficient processor design in recent years, how to provide performance with affordable hardware and power consumption has become an important issue. In this paper, we study and evaluate several variants on the TAgged GEometric history length (TAGE) branch predictors for better power, cost and performance portfolio, including fast-TAGE (f-TAGE), Fixed-Interleaving- TAGE (FI-TAGE), Non-Fixed-Interleaving TAGE (NFI-TAGE) and Bitflipping- Interleaving TAGE (BI-TAGE). We analyze and empirically study our proposed scheme along with the original TAGE with respect to branch prediction accuracy, critical path delay, hardware overhead and power consumption. It is shown, among the proposed variants that f-TAGE fares best, reducing critical path delay by over 20% while preserving prediction accuracy at affordable hardware and power requirements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Lee, J., Smith, A.J.: Branch prediction strategies and branch target buffer design. IEEE Computer, 6–22 (January 1984)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yeh, T.Y., Patt, Y.N.: Two-level adaptive training branch prediction. In: Proceedings of the 24th Annual International Symposium on Microarchitecture, pp. 51–61 (November 1991)

    Google Scholar 

  3. McFarling, S.: Combining branch predictors. Digital Equipment Corporation, WRL Tech. Note TN-36 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Michaud, P., Seznec, A., Uhlig, R.: Trading conflict and capacity aliasing in conditional branch predictors. In: Proceedings of the 24th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture, pp. 292–303 (May 1997)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sprangle, E.E., Chappell, R., Alsup, M., Patt, Y.: The Agree predictor: A mechanism for reducing negative branch history interference. In: Proceedings of the 24th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture (May 1997)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lee, C.-C., Chen, I.-C.K., Mudge, T.N.: The bimode branch predictor. In: Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Microarchitecture, pp. 4–13 (December 1997)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Eden, A., Mudge, T.: The YAGS Branch Prediction Scheme. In: Proc. 31st International Symposium on Micro-architecture, pp. 69–77 (November 1998)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chang, P., Evers, M., Patt, Y.: Improving branch prediction accuracy by reducing pattern history table interference. In: Proceedings of the International Conference Parallel Architecture and Compilation Techniques, pp. 48–57 (October 1995)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jimènez, D.A., Lin, C.: Dynamic branch prediction with perceptrons. In: The Seventh International Symposium on High-Performance Computer Architecture, HPCA, pp. 197–206 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jimènez, D.A., Lin, C.: Neural Methods for Dynamic Branch Prediction. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems 20(4), 369–397 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jimènez, D.A.: Fast path-based neural branch prediction. In: Proceedings of 36th Annual IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Microarchitecture, MICRO 36, December 3-5, pp. 243–252 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jimènez, D.A.: Piecewise linear branch prediction. In: Proceedings of 32nd International Symposium on Computer Architecture, ISCA 2005, June 4-8, pp. 382–393 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jimènez, D.A.: Improved Latency and Accuracy for Neural Branch Prediction. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems 23(2), 197–218 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. St. Amant, R., Jimènez, D.A., Burger, D.: Low-power, high-performance analog neural branch prediction. In: 2008 41st IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Microarchitecture, MICRO 41, November 8-12, pp. 447–458 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Seznec, A.: Analysis of the O-GEometric history length branch predictor. In: Proceedings of 32nd International Symposium on Computer Architecture, ISCA 2005, June 4-8, pp. 394–405 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Seznec, A.: Genesis of the O-GEHL branch predictor. Journal of Instruction Level Parallelism (April 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Seznec, A., Michaud, P.: A case for (partially)-tagged geometric history length predictors. Journal of Instruction Level Parallelism (April 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Seznec, A.: The L-TAGE predictor. Journal of Instruction Level Parallelism 9 (April 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jimènez, D.A., Keckler, S.W., Lin, C.: The impact of delay on the design of branch predictors. In: Proceedings of 33rd Annual IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Microarchitecture, MICRO 33, pp. 67–76 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Stark, J., Evers, M., Patt, Y.N.: Variable length path branch prediction. SIGOPS Oper. Syst. Rev. 32, 5 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Todd, M., et al.: SimpleScalar 3.0, http://www.simple-scalar.com/

  22. Brooks, D.: Wattch Version 1.02, http://www.eecs.harvard.edu/~dbrooks/wattch-form.html

  23. Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation, http://www.specbench.org/osg/cpu2000/

  24. Kessler, R.: The Alpha 21264 microprocessor. IEEE Micro 19(2), 24–36 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/cacti/

  26. Sutherland, I., et al.: Logic Effort: Designing Fast CMOS Circuits. Morgan Kaufmann series

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wang, Y.: Study and Analysis of Variable Length History Predictors. Master Thesis, Dept. of Computer Science and Engineering, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung, Taiwan (January 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  28. SYNOPSYS, http://www.synopsys.com/home.aspx , http://www.synopsys.com/Tools/Implementation/SignOff/Pages/PrimeTime.aspx

  29. Maa, Y.-C., et al.: Evaluating and Improving Variable Length History Branch Predictors. In: Proceedings of 2010 International Computer Symposium, Tainan, Taiwan (December 2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yeong-Chang Maa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Maa, YC., Yen, MH. (2013). On the Variants of Tagged Geometric History Length Branch Predictors. In: Pan, JS., Yang, CN., Lin, CC. (eds) Advances in Intelligent Systems and Applications - Volume 2. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 21. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35473-1_78

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35473-1_78

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-35472-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-35473-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics