Skip to main content

Knowledge Flows in High-Tech Industry Clusters: Dissemination Mechanisms and Innovation Regimes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Long Term Economic Development

Part of the book series: Economic Complexity and Evolution ((ECAE))

Abstract

This paper explores knowledge flows, i.e., creation and dissemination of knowledge, in three types of clusters in order to lay a conceptual foundation for analysis of knowledge-based industry clusters and for technology policy. Distinction is made between two different innovation regimes: discovery-driven innovation, represented by Silicon Valley and Cambridge, UK, in semiconductors, and by Boston/Cambridge, the San Francisco Bay Area and Medicon Valley in biotechnology; and design-driven innovation as represented by Boeing in Seattle, Bombardier in Montreal, Airbus in Toulouse, and Saab in Linköping in the aircraft industry. In each cluster, the role of universities and other creators of knowledge is examined. The nature of knowledge dissemination is also analyzed, distinguishing between market-mediated transfers of knowledge and non-market mediated and undirected transfers (“true” spillovers). The role of new start-ups versus incumbent firms in knowledge dissemination and cluster growth is also examined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Acs et al. (2009) and Braunerhjelm et al. (2010) have suggested entrepreneurial activity as one mechanism of converting new economically useful knowledge into economic growth.

  2. 2.

    For a survey of the literature on innovation systems, see Carlsson (2007).

  3. 3.

    This is not to suggest that market-mediated knowledge transfers are unimportant—on the contrary. They are the dominant mechanisms of knowledge diffusion. But they are not true spillovers.

  4. 4.

    The Saab JAS-39 Gripen project is an exception; it is based on fixed-price contracts.

References

  • Abramovitz M (1956) Resource and output trends in the United States since 1870. Am Econ Rev 46(2):5–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Acs ZJ, Audretsch DB, Braunerhjelm P, Carlsson B (2009) The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Bus Econ 32(1):15–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anselin L, Varga A, Acs Z (1997) Local geographic spillovers between university research and high technology innovations. J Urban Econ 42:422–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arikan AT (2009) Interfirm knowledge exchanges and the knowledge creation capability of clusters. Acad Manage Rev 34(4):658–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bathelt HA, Malmberg A, Maskell P (2004) Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Prog Hum Geogr 28(1):31–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belussi F, Caldari K (2009) At the origin of the industrial district: Alfred Marshall and the Cambridge School. Cambridge J Econ 33:335–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergek A, Jacobsson S, Carlsson B, Lindmark S, Rickne A (2008) Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: a scheme of analysis. Res Policy 37(4):407–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braunerhjelm P, Acz Z, Audretsch D, Carlsson B (2010) The missing link: knowledge diffusion and entrepreneurship in endogenous growth. Small Bus Econ 34(2):105–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breschi S, Lissoni F (2001) Knowledge spillovers and local innovation systems: a critical survey. Ind Corp Change 10(4):975–1005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bresnahan T, Gambardella A, Saxenian A (2001) Old economy inputs for new economy outcomes: cluster formation in the new silicon valleys. Ind Corp Change 10(4):835–860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantner U, Pyka A (2001) Classifying technology policy from an evolutionary perspective. Res Policy 30(5):759–775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson B (ed) (1995) Technological systems and economic performance: the case of factory automation. Kluwer Academic, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson B (ed) (1997) Technological systems and industrial dynamics. Kluwer Academic, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson B (ed) (2002) Technological systems in the bio industries: an international study. Kluwer Academic, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson B (2007) Innovation systems: a survey of the literature from a Schumpeterian perspective. In: Hanusch H, Pyka A (eds) Elgar companion to neo-Schumpeterian economics. Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 857–871

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson B, Fridh A-C (2002) Technology transfer in United States universities: a survey and statistical analysis. J Evol Econ 12(1–2):199–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson B, Stankiewicz R (1991) On the nature, function, and composition of technological systems. J Evol Econ 1(2):93–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson B, Acs Z, Audretsch DB, Braunerhjelm P (2009) Knowledge creation, entrepreneurship, and economic growth: a historical review. Ind Corp Change 18(6):1193–1229, http://icc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/dtp043?ijkey=Ayz62ZKvXWykosm&keytype=ref

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen JF (2003) Introduction: the industrial dynamics of biotechnology: new insights and new agendas. Ind Innov 10(3):223–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coenen L, Moodysson J, Asheim B (2004) Nodes, networks and proximities: on the knowledge dynamics of the Medicon Valley biotech cluster. Eur Plan Stud 12(7):1003–1016

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke P (2004) Life sciences clusters and regional science policy. Urban Stud 41(5/6):1113–1131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dosi G (1988) Sources procedures and microeconomic effects of innovation. J Econ Lit 26(3):1120–1171

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliasson G (2010) Advanced public procurement as industrial policy – aircraft industry as a technical university. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ernst D, Kim L (2002) Global production networks, knowledge diffusion, and local capability formation. Res Policy 31:1417–1429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman MP (1999) The new economics of innovation, spillovers and agglomeration: a review of empirical studies. Econ Innov New Technol 8(1):5–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman MP (2003) The locational dynamics of the US biotechnology industry: knowledge externalities and the anchor hypothesis. Ind Innov 10(3):311–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garnsey E, Heffernan P (2007) The Cambridge high-tech cluster: an evolutionary perspective (Chapter 2). In: Frenken K (ed) Applied evolutionary economics and economic geography. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 27–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon IR, McCann P (2000) Industrial clusters: complexes, agglomeration and/or social networks? Urban Stud 37(3):513–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griliches Z (1992) The search for R&D spillovers. Scand J Econ 94(Suppl):29–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe A (1989) Real effects of academic research. Am Econ Rev 79:957–970

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M, Henderson R (1993) Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quart J Econ 108(3):577–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenney M, Patton D (2006) The coevolution of technologies and institutions: Silicon Valley as the iconic high-technology cluster. In: Braunerhjelm P, Feldman MP (eds) Cluster genesis. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 38–60

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman P (1991) Increasing returns and economic geography. J Polit Econ 99:483–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laursen K, Salter A (2004) Searching high and low: what types of firms use universities as a source of innovation? Res Policy 3:1201–1215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lécuyer C (2005) What do universities really owe industry? The case of solid state electronics at Stanford. Minerva 43:51–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenoir T, Rosenberg N, Rowen H, Lécuyer C, Colyvas J, Godlfarb G (2003) Inventing the Entrepreneurial University: Stanford and the co-evolution of Silicon Valley. http://www.siepr.stanford.edu/programs/SST_seminars/Lenoir.pdf

  • Lucas R (1988) On the mechanics of economic development. J Monet Econ 22:3–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, E (1995) Academic research underlying industrial innovations: sources, characteristics, and financing. Rev Econ Stat 77(1):55–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markusen A (1996) Sticky places in slippery space: a typology of industrial districts. Econ Geogr 71(3):293–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall A (1920) Principles of economics, 8th edn, vol 1. Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall A (1923) Industry and trade. Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Maskell P (2001) Towards a knowledge-based theory of the geographical cluster. Ind Corp Change 10(4):921–943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKelvey M, Alm H, Riccaboni M (2003) Does co-location matter for formal knowledge collaboration in the Swedish biotechnology – pharmaceutical sector? Res Policy 32:483–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe JS (1994) Evolutionary economics and technology policy. Econ J 104(425):931–944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe JS (1995) The economic foundations of technology policy: equilibrium and evolutionary perspectives. In: Stoneman P (ed) Handbook of the economics of innovation and technological change. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore G, Davis K (2001) Learning the Silicon Valley way. Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research discussion paper 00–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Niosi J, Zhegu M (2005) Aerospace clusters: local or global knowledge spillovers? Ind Innov 12(1):1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen-Smith J, Powell WW (2004) Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: the effects of spillovers in the Boston biotechnology community. Organ Sci 15(1):5–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen-Smith J, Powell W (2007) Accounting for emergence and novelty in Boston and Bay Area biotechnology. In: Braunerhjelm P, Feldman MP (eds) Cluster genesis. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 61–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME (1990) The competitive advantage of nations. Free, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME (1998) Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harv Bus Rev November–December:77–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell WW, Koput KW, Smith-Doerr L (1996) Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: networks of learning in biotechnology. Adm Sci Q 41(1):116–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romanelli E, Feldman M (2006) Anatomy of cluster development: emergence and convergence in the US human biotherapeutics, 1976–2003. In: Braunerhjelm P, Feldman MP (eds) Cluster genesis. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 87–110

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Romer P (1986) Increasing returns and economic growth. Am Econ Rev 94:1002–1037

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer P (1990) Endogenous technical change. J Polit Econ 98:71–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saxenian A (1994) Regional advantage. Culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Smits R, Kuhlmann S, Shapira P (2010) The theory and practice of innovation policy. Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Solow RM (1956) A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Quart J Econ 70(1):65–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stankiewicz R (2002) The cognitive dynamics of biotechnology and the evolution of its technological system. In: Carlsson B (ed) Technological systems in the bio industries. Springer, New York, pp 35–52

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Waters R, Lawton Smith H (2002) Regional development agencies and local economic development: scale and competitiveness in high-technology Oxfordshire and Cambridgeshire. Eur Plan Stud 10(5):633–649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waters R, Lawton Smith H (2008) Social networks in high-technology local economies: the cases of Oxfordshire and Cambridgeshire. Eur Urban Reg Stud 15(1):21–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werker C, Athreye S (2004) Marshall’s disciples: knowledge and innovation driving regional economic development and growth. J Evol Econ 14(5):505–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zucker LG, Darby MR (1996) Star scientists and institutional transformation: patterns of invention and innovation in the formation of the U.S. biotechnology industry. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:706–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zucker LG, Darby MR, Armstrong J (1998a) Geographically localized knowledge: spillovers or markets? Econ Inq 36(1):65–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zucker LG, Darby MR, Brewer M (1998b) Intellectual human capital and the birth of US biotechnology enterprises. Am Econ Rev 88(1):290–306

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bo Carlsson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Carlsson, B. (2013). Knowledge Flows in High-Tech Industry Clusters: Dissemination Mechanisms and Innovation Regimes. In: Pyka, A., Andersen, E. (eds) Long Term Economic Development. Economic Complexity and Evolution. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35125-9_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35125-9_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-35124-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-35125-9

  • eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics