Abstract
Bone loss around the knee in the setting of total knee arthroplasty remains a difficult and challenging problem for Orthopaedic surgeons. There are a number of options for dealing with smaller and contained bone loss, however segmental bone loss has fewer options. Small, contained defects may be treated with cement, morsellized autograft/allograft or metal augments. Larger amounts of bone loss or segmental bone loss cannot be dealt with by simple addition of cement, morselized autograft/allograft or metal augments. For younger or higher demand patients, the use of allograft is a good option as it provides a durable construct with high rates of union while restoring bone stock for future revisions. Older patients, or those who are low demand, may be better candidates for a tumour prosthesis, which provides immediate ability to weight-bear and mobilize.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Engh GA. Bone defect classification. In: Engh GAR CH, editor. Revision total knee arthroplasty. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1997. p. 63–120.
Clatworthy MG, Ballance J, Brick GW, Chandler HP, Gross AE. The use of structural allograft for uncontained defects in revision total knee arthroplasty. A minimum five-year review. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83-A(3):404–11.
Fawcett K, Barr A. In: Banks AAB, editor. Tissue banking. Arlington: American Association of Blood Banks; 1987. p. 97.
Backstein D, Safir O, Gross A. Management of bone loss: structural grafts in revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;446:104–12.
Younger AS, Duncan CP, Masri BA. Surgical exposures in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1998;6–1:55–64.
Lonner JH, Desai P, Dicesare PE, Steiner G, Zuckerman JD. The reliability of analysis of intraoperative frozen sections for identifying active infection during revision hip or knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78(10):1553–8.
Hockman DE, Ammeen D, Engh GA. Augments and allografts in revision total knee arthroplasty: usage and outcome using one modular revision prosthesis. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20(1):35–41.
Burnett RS, Berger RA, Della Valle CJ, Sporer SM, Jacobs JJ, Paprosky WG, Rosenberg AG. Extensor mechanism allograft reconstruction after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(Suppl 1-Pt 2):175–94.
Zywiel M, Kosashvili Y, Gross A, Safir OA, Backstein D. Complete allograft reconstruction after extensor mechanism failure. Semin Arthroplasty. 2009;20:194–9.
Mow CS, Wiedel JD. Structural allografting in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1996;11–3:235–41.
Stockley I, McAuley JP, Gross AE. Allograft reconstruction in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992;74–3:393–7.
Ghazavi MT, Stockley I, Yee G, Davis A, Gross AE. Reconstruction of massive bone defects with allograft in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79–1:17–25.
Engh GA, Ammeen DJ. Use of structural allograft in revision total knee arthroplasty in knees with severe tibial bone loss. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89–12:2640–7.
Richards CJ, Garbuz DS, Pugh L, Masri BA. Revision total knee arthroplasty clinical outcome comparison with and without the use of femoral head structural allograft. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26:1299.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 EFORT
About this entry
Cite this entry
Kuchinad, R.A., Garbedian, S., Rogers, B.A., Backstein, D., Safir, O., Gross, A.E. (2014). Structural Allografts for Bone Loss in the Knee - Arthroplasty Options. In: Bentley, G. (eds) European Surgical Orthopaedics and Traumatology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34746-7_143
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34746-7_143
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-34745-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-34746-7
eBook Packages: MedicineReference Module Medicine