Skip to main content

Fire Spread Regulated by Weather, Landscape Structure, and Management in Wisconsin Oak- Dominated Forests and New Jersey Pinelands

  • Chapter
Remote Sensing and Modeling Applications to Wildland Fires

Abstract

This study is to predict fire spread behavior and burned area across two fire-prone landscapes with contrasting vegetation (Oak-dominated ecosystem in WI vs. pine-dominated ecosystem in NJ), fuel-type composition, and land-use history regulated by the effects of weather, landscape structure and land management by combining simulations from three models (FARSITE, HARVEST, AND FRAGSTATS) under different scenarios. The results demonstrate:\1- substantial differences in fire-spread patterns between the two landscapes were observed when holding weather conditions constant and excluding roads, indicating that landscape fragmentation is a main controlling factor on fire spread at the landscape level; ➁ roads functioning as barriers could significantly reduce the burned area from fire spread; and ➂ Harvesting effects showed different trends, depending on landscape fuel type composition and weather conditions. At 4% harvesting intensity, both clustered and dispersed methods showed no significant impact (a=0.01) on reducing the mean burned area across the more fragmented WI landscape, but showed significant effects on fire spread in the less fragmented NJ landscape in summer when weather was hot and dry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Albert DA, (1995), Regional landscape ecosystems of Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin: a working map and classification. Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-178, USDA Forest Service North Central Forest Experiment Station, St. Paul, MN

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson HE, (1982), Aids to determining fuel models for estimating fire behavior. General Technical Report INT-GTR-122, USDA Forest Service

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresee MK, Le Moine JM, Mather S, Brosofske KD, Chen J, Crow TR Rademacher J, (2004), Disturbance and landscape dynamics in the Chequamegon National Forest, Wisconsin, USA, from 1972 to 2001. Landscape Ecology, 19: 291–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardille JA, Ventura SJ, Turner MG, (2001), Environmental and social factors influencing wildfires in the upper midwest, United Stats. Ecological Applications, 11: 111–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finney MA, (1998), FARSITE: fire area simulator—model development and evaluation. Res. Pap. RMRS-RP-4, USDA, For. Serv. Rocky Mt. Res. Station, Fort Collins, CO, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Finney MA, Andrews PL, (1999), FARSITE: Fire area simulator—a model for fire growth simulation. Fire Management Notes, 59: 13–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Finney MA, (2000), A spatial analysis of fire behavior associated with forest blowdown in the Boundary Waters Canoe Area, Minnesota Duluth, MN. USDA Superior National Forest http://www.superiornationalforest.org/ july4thstorm1999/bwcara/bwcawra.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham RT, (2003), Influence of forest structure on wildfire behavior and the severity of its effects: an overview. USDA, Forest Service, North Central Experiment Station, 12

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson EJ, Crow TR, (1996), Simulating the effects of alternative forest management strategies on landscape structure. Journal of Environmental Management, 46: 77–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huff MH, Ottmar RD, Lehmkuhl JF, Hessburg PF, Everett RL, Alvarado E, Vihanek RH, (1995), Historical and current forest landscapes of eastern Oregon and Washington. Part II: potential fire behavior and smoke production. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-355, USDA Forest Service, Portland, OR

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt Jr. ER, Lavigne MB, Franklin SE, (1999), Factors controlling the decline of net primary production with stand age for balsam fir in Newfoundland assessed using an ecosystem simulation model. Ecological Modelling, 122: 151–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keane RE, Arno SF, Brown JK, (1989), FIRESUM-an ecological process odel for fire succession in western conifer forests. General Technical Report INT-266, USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station

    Google Scholar 

  • Kercher JR, Axelrod MC, (1984), A process model of fire ecology and succession in a mixedconifer forest. Ecology, 65: 1725–1742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lathrop R, Kaplan MB, (2004), New Jersey land use/land cover update: 2000-2001. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, 35

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick J, Jones L, (1973), The Pine Barrens: Vegetation Geography. New Jersey State Museum, 76

    Google Scholar 

  • McGarical K, Marks BJ, (1995), FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure (version 2.0). USDA Forest Service, PNW-GTR-351, Portland, OR

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller C, Urban DL, (1999), A model of surface fire, climate and forest patter in the Sierra Nevada, California. Ecological Modeling, 114: 113–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noormets A, Chen J, LeMoine J, Rademacher J, (2004), Seasonal dynamics of ecosystem carbon fluxes in five managed Northern Wisconsin forests. Global Change Biology: Submitted

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyne SJ, Andrews PL, Laven RD, (1996), Introduction to wildland fire. John Wiley & Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Radeloff VC, Mladenodd DJ, He HS, Boyce MS, (1999), Forest landscape change in the northwestern Wisconsin Pine Barrens from pre-European settlement to the present. Canadian J. of Forest Research, 29: 1649–1659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rollins MG, Morgan P, Swetnam T, (2002), Landscape-scale controls over 20th century fire occurrence in two large Rocky Mountain (USA) wilderness areas. Landscape Ecology, 17: 539–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothermel RC, (1983), How to predict the spread and intensity of forest and range fires. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-143, USDA Forest Service

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouse JW, Haas RH, Schell JA, Deering DW, (1973), Monitoring vegetation systems in the Great Plains with ERTS. pp 48–62 in Third ERTS Symposium

    Google Scholar 

  • Stratton RD, (2004), Assessing the effectiveness of landscape fule treatments on fire growth and behavior. Journal of forestry, 102: 32–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturtevant BR, Zollner PA, Gustafson EJ, Cleland DT, (2004), Human influence on the abundance and connectivity of high-risk fuels in mixed forests of northern Wisconsin, USA. Landscape Ecology, 19: 235–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Tsinghua University Press, Beijing and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zheng, D., LaCroix, J.J., Ryu, SR., Chen, J., Hom, J., Clark, K. (2013). Fire Spread Regulated by Weather, Landscape Structure, and Management in Wisconsin Oak- Dominated Forests and New Jersey Pinelands. In: Qu, J.J., Sommers, W.T., Yang, R., Riebau, A.R. (eds) Remote Sensing and Modeling Applications to Wildland Fires. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32530-4_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics