Abstract
While an open disclosure response to major health care error is now regarded as standard and ethical practice, published health care standards or conventions, case law and the literature provide scant guidance about how to respond to incidents where error has gone unnoticed, where a major incident has been averted, where the error is widespread, or where the health practice environment is hostile to an open disclosure approach.
However, by applying a principles ethics approach or a public health ethics approach to case scenarios, it is possible to demonstrate that open disclosure may not always be the best response to any and all kinds of health care error. Asking a series of questions about the setting and severity of health care error will guide health practitioners in determining whether an open disclosure response is appropriate in any given situation. These questions are set out in the Ready Reckoner:
-
1.
Are there legal requirements which apply in the jurisdiction – laws, codes, standards, or mandatory policies – which compel open disclosure in response to the health care error in question?
-
If yes, → follow the requirements.
-
If no (near miss, error without harm, error with impact on a community of commonly affected individuals, international setting where there is no law, code, or standard), → question 2.
-
-
2.
Where ethical principles alone guide decision-making, ask:
Are the social, legal, cultural, and professional conditions conducive to open disclosure?
-
If yes, → consider ethics of open disclosure in relation to the health care error in question by identifying stakeholders and applying a principles approach and/or public health approach and respond informed by this ethical analysis.
-
If no, → question 3.
-
Where the health care environment is not conducive to open disclosure at all, the response will depend on analysis using an appropriate ethics framework – either principles approach or a public health ethics approach. Where open disclosure to individuals is not possible, consider other actions which promote good and do no or least harm.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aldrich R, Finlayson P, Hill K, Sullivan M. Look back and talk openly: responding to and communicating about the risk of large-scale error in pathology diagnoses. Int J Qual Health Care. 2012; 24(2):135–143. http://intqhc.oxfordjournals.org/content/24/2/135.abstract. Accessed 14 Oct 2012.
Australian Commission for Safety and Quality in Health Care (ACSQHC). Open disclosure standard. Sydney: ACSQHC; 2008.
ACSQHC. Open disclosure manager handbook: a handbook for hospital managers to assist with the implementation of the open disclosure standard. Sydney: ACSQHC; 2010. http://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/39897-OD-MgrHbk-LowRes1.pdf. Accessed 14 Oct 2012.
ACSQHC. National safety and quality health service standards. Sydney: ACSQHC; 2011. http://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/NSQHS-Standards-Sept-2012.pdf Accessed 14 Oct 2012.
ACSQHC. Australian open disclosure framework consultation draft. See Section 3.3 Large scale disclosure. 2012a. http://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/62838-Australian-Open-Disclosure-Framework-Consultation-Draft-June-20121.pdf. Accessed 14 Oct 2012.
ACSQHC. Open disclosure standard review report. Sydney: ACSQHC; 2012b. http://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/63652-Open-Disclosure-Standard-Review-Report-Final-Jun-2012.pdf. Accessed 14 Oct 2012.
Australia New Zealand College of Anaesthetists. Resource Document 23. 2011. Communication and consent at, http://www.anzca.edu.au/fellows/special-interest-groups/welfare-of-anaesthetists/pdfs/RD%2023%20Communication%20Consent%202011.pdf. Accessed 14 Oct 2012.
Australian Nurses Midwifery Council (ANMC). Code of professional conduct for midwives. 2010a. http://www.nursingmidwiferyboard.gov.au/Codes-Guidelines-Statements/Codes-Guidelines.aspx#codesofprofessionalconduct. Accessed 14 Oct 2012.
ANMC. Code of professional conduct for nurses. 2010b. http://www.nursingmidwiferyboard.gov.au/Codes-Guidelines-Statements/Codes-Guidelines.aspx#codesofprofessionalconduct. Accessed 14 Oct 2012.
Baker GR, Norton PG, Flintoft V, et al. The Canadian adverse events study: the incidence of adverse events among hospital patients in Canada. Can Med Assoc J. 2004;170:1678–86.
BBC On-line. Milburn sorry for ‘unforgivable pain’. Tuesday, 30 Jan 2001. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/1144454.stm. Accessed 14 Oct 2012.
Beauchamp TL, Childress JL. Principles of biomedical ethics. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 1989.
Bismark M, Dauer E, Paterson R, Studdert D. Accountability sought by patients following adverse events from medical care: the New Zealand experience. Can Med Assoc J. 2006;175:889–94.
Cartwright SR. The report of the committee of inquiry into allegations concerning the treatment of cervical cancer at National Women’s Hospital and into other related matters. Auckland: Government Printing Office; 1988.
Chafe R, Levinson W, Sullivan T. Disclosing errors that affect multiple patients. Can Med Assoc J. 2009;180(11):1125–7.
Coney S, Bunkle P. An “unfortunate experiment” at National Women’s Hospital Auckland. Metro. 1987; June: 47–65.
Dudzinski DM, Herbert PC, Foglia MB, Gallagher TH. The disclosure dilemma – large-scale adverse events. New Eng J Med. 2010;363(10):978–86.
Faunce TA, Bolsin SN. Fiduciary disclosure of medical mistakes: the duty of promptly notify patients of adverse health care events. J Law Med. 2005;12:478–82.
Ghalandarpoorattar SM, Kaviani A, Asghari F. Medical error disclosure: the gap between attitude and practice. Postgrad Med J. 2012;88(1037):130–3.
Hall S. Cancer women get screening error apology. The guardian 29 June 2006. 2006. http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2006/jun/29/cancercare.health. Accessed 14 Oct 2012.
Health Consumers Association of Australia. 2008. http://hcca-act.blogspot.com.au/2008/10/open-disclosure-is-about-open.html. Accessed 14 Oct 2012.
Hunter-Gault C. An apology 65 years late. News hour report 16 May 1997. 1997. http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/health/jan-june97/tuskegee_5-16.html. Accessed 14 Oct 2012.
Ibrahim A, Garba ES, Asuku ME. Challenges in disclosure of adverse events and errors in surgery; perspectives from sub-Saharan Africa. Pan Afr Med J. 2012;12:82.
Iedema R, Allen S, Britton K, et al. Patients’ and family members’ views on how clinicians enact and how they should enact incident disclosure: the “100 patient stories” qualitative study. Br Med J. 2011; 343: d4423. http://www.bmj.com/content/343/bmj.d4423 Accessed 14 Oct 2012.
Iedema R, Sorensen R, Piper D. Open disclosure: a review of the literature. Report to the commonwealth of Australia on behalf of the Australian Commission on safety and quality in health care. Sydney: ACSQHC; 2008. http://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Open-Disclosure-A-Review-of-the-Literature.pdf Accessed 14 Oct 2012.
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Health Care Organizations (JCAHO). Speak up initiative. 2002. http://www.jointcommission.org/assets/1/18/Facts_about_Speak_Up1.PDF. Accessed 14 Oct 2012.
King P. Shouldering the burden of disclosure (Commentary on Wighton v Arnot). Aust Health Law Bull. 2005;14(2):2–25.
Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS (Institute of Medicine). To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2000.
Kraman SS, Hamm G. Extreme honesty may be the best policy. Ann Int Med. 1999;131:963–7.
Lamb R. Open disclosure: the only approach to medical error. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004;13:3–5.
Levinson W, Gallagher TH. Disclosing medical errors to patients: a status report. Can Med Assoc J. 2007;177(3):265–7.
Madden B, Cockburn T. Duty to disclose medical error in Australia. Aust Health Law Bull. 2005;14(2):13–9.
Madden B, Cockburn T. Bundaberg and beyond: duty to disclose adverse events to patients. J Law Med. 2007;14:501–27.
Marella WM. Why worry about near misses? Pat Saf Qual Healthcare. 2007;4:22–6.
Massachusetts Coalition for the Prevention of Medical Errors. When things go wrong. Responding to adverse events: a consensus statement of the Harvard Hospitals. Boston: Massachusetts Coalition for the Prevention of Medical Errors; 2006.
Medical Board of Australia. Good medical practice: code of conduct for doctors. 2010. http://www.medicalboard.gov.au/Codes-Guidelines-Policies.aspx. Accessed 14 Oct 2012.
NSW Health. Guideline 2007_007 open disclosure. Sydney: NSW Health; 2007a. http://www.health.nsw.gov.au/policies/gl/2007/pdf/GL2007_007.pdf. Accessed 14 Oct 2012.
NSW Health. Policy directive 2007_040 open disclosure. Sydney: NSW Health; 2007b. http://www.health.nsw.gov.au/policies/pd/2007/pdf/PD2007_040.pdf. Accessed 14 Oct 2012.
NSW Health. Policy Directive 2007_061: Incident Management. Sydney: NSW Health; 2007c. http://www.health.nsw.gov.au/policies/pd/2007/pdf/PD2007_061.pdf. Accessed 14 Oct 2012.
Piper D, Iedema R. Literature review: incident disclosure policy, legal reform and research since 2008. Sydney: Centre for Health Communication (University of Technology Sydney), and Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care; 2011. http://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Literature-review-incident-disclosure-research-policy-and-legal-reforms-since-2008.pdf. Accessed 14 Oct 2012.
Rait JL, Van Ekert E. Legal aspects of open disclosure ll: attitudes of health professionals – findings from a national survey (Letter). Med J Aust. 2011;194(1):48.
Raanan G. Medical ethics: four principles plus attention to scope. Br Med J. 1994;309:184.
Roberts MJ, Reich MR. Ethical analysis in public health. Lancet. 2002;359(9311):1055–9.
Royal Australasian College of Physicians. Principles of RACP policy and advocacy. Sydney: RACP; 2011. http://www.theprreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/RACP_Principles-of-Policy-Advocacy_Handbook.pdf. Accessed 14 Oct 2012.
Stewart C. Date unknown. Legal duties to disclose medical error: Australian and overseas examples. http://www.slatergordon.com.au/files/editor_upload/File/MedicalNegligence/CameronStewart.pdf. Accessed 14 Oct 2012.
Stewart C, Kerridge I, Parker M. The Australian medicolegal handbook with PDA Software. 2007. Elsevier Australia: Section 4.8.2.
Studdert DM, Mello MM, Gawande AA, et al. Disclosure of medical injury to patients: an improbable risk management strategy. Health Aff. 2007;26(1):215–26.
Studdert DM, Richardson MW. Legal aspects of open disclosure: a review of Australian law. Med J Aust. 2010;193:273–6.
Studdert D, Piper D, Iedema R. Legal aspects of open disclosure II: attitudes of health professionals — findings from a national survey. Med J Aust. 2010; 193:351–355. http://gawande.com/documents/DisclosureofMedicalInjurytoPatients.pdf
The Empowered Patient Coalition. 2012. http://www.empoweredpatientcoalition.org. Accessed 14 Oct 2012.
Thomson J. What to do after the event. Medical observer. 2010. http://www.medicalobserver.com.au/news/what-to-do-after-the-event. Accessed 14 Oct 2012.
United Nations. Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 25. 1948. http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/index.shtml. Accessed 14 Oct 2012.
Vincent CA, Young M, Phillips A. Why do people sue doctors? Lancet. 1994;343:1609–13.
Walton M, Woodward H, Van Staalduinen S, et al. The WHO patient safety curriculum guide for medical schools. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19:542e546. http://cores33webs.mede.uic.edu/ipse/edresources/documents/Publications/Teaching%20Patient%20Safety/Walton_The%20WHO%20patient%20safety%20curriculum%20for%20medical%20schools.pdf. Accessed 14 Oct 2012.
Wilson R, Runciman WB, Gibberd RW, Harrison B, Newby L, Hamilton J. The quality in Australian health care study. Med J Aust. 1995;163:458–71.
World Health Organisation. Topic 8 Engaging with patients and carers in Patient safety curriculum guide for medical schools. Geneva: WHO; 2010. http://www.who.int/patientsafety/education/curriculum/who_mc_topic-8.pdf Accessed 14 Oct 2012.
Wu A. Medical error: the second victim. Br Med J. 2000;320:726–7.
Wu A, Gallagher TH, Iedema R. Disclosing close calls to patients and their families. In: Wu A, editor. The value of close calls. Oakbrook Terrace: Joint Commission US; 2010. pp. 55–67.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this entry
Cite this entry
Aldrich, R. (2013). Open Disclosure: Ethical and Cultural Considerations. In: Beran, R. (eds) Legal and Forensic Medicine. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32338-6_159
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32338-6_159
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-32337-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-32338-6
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesReference Module Biomedical and Life Sciences