Abstract
The term “asbestos” refers to a group of naturally occurring fibrous hydrated silicates. Asbestos achieved wide popularity in the building and construction industry after World War II because of its physical properties. It is no longer used because of its deleterious effects on health. Asbestos exposure may cause a number of medical conditions, some of which are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The detrimental effects of exposure on health have been recorded back to ancient times but more fully described over the last century. Despite the well-documented effects of asbestos as a health hazard, little was done to protect the exposed workforce. Governments and regulatory authorities in Australia have been exceptionally tardy in introducing legislation to prevent its ongoing use and to protect people who may be exposed. The last 20–30 years have seen an explosion of litigation against organizations mining and supplying asbestos or asbestos-containing products in Australia. Asbestos exposure causes a broad spectrum of diseases, for which there is no cure. These include pleural plaques, diffuse pleural thickening, benign pleural effusions, diffuse pulmonary fibrosis (asbestosis), carcinoma of the lung and upper airway, and pleural and peritoneal mesothelioma. The risk of asbestos-related disease is related to the degree of exposure, and a long period between first exposure and presentation of disease is a characteristic of this group of disorders. The greater the exposure the greater the risk, but there is no known lower protective threshold of exposure as exemplified by the occurrence of mesothelioma.
The legal landscape, across Australia, varies from state to state and the substantive law of the state in which the exposure to asbestos occurred is the relevant law which governs a person’s claim. There are two broad categories of claims available to asbestos disease sufferers or their dependents, namely, common law (negligence) and workers’ compensation claims. Most people suffering from a mesothelioma or asbestosis are entitled to significant compensation and many of those with lung cancer will be successful if they can show that they have been exposed. Causation is the most significant legal hurdle and the relevant common law test is whether asbestos exposure has caused or materially contributed to the development of the disease. The causation tests in workers’ compensation claims vary from state to state but often contain a lower threshold requirement for causation. It is strongly recommended that legal advice be obtained as soon as possible after diagnosis.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Cooke WE. Pulmonary asbestosis. Br Med J. 1927;2:1024–5.
Merewether ERA, Price CW. Report on effects of asbestos dust on the lungs and dust suppression in the asbestos industry. London: His Majesty’s Stationary Office; 1930.
Jamrozik E, de Klerk N, Musk AW. Asbestos-related disease. Intern Med J. 2011;41:372–80.
Churg A, Wright JL. Persistence of natural mineral fibers in human lungs: an overview. Environ Health Perspect. 1994;102(Suppl 5):229–33.
Asbestos, asbestosis and cancer. Proceedings of an international expert meeting, 20–22 January 1997, Helsinki, Finland. Helsinki, Finland: Finnish Institute of Occupational Health. People and Work Research Reports 14, 1–98.
National Occupational Health and Safety Commission. The incidence of mesothelioma in Australia 1999–2001 – Australia Mesothelioma Register Report 2004. Canberra: National Occupational Health and Safety Commission; 2004.
Olsen NJ, Franklin PJ, Reid A, et al. Increasing incidence of malignant mesothelioma after exposure to asbestos during home maintenance and renovation. Med J Aust. 2011;195:271–4.
Leigh J, Davidson P, Hendrie L, Berry D. Malignant mesothelioma in Australia, 1945–2000. Am J Ind Med. 2002;41:188–201.
Tracey E, Alam N, Chen W, Bishop J. Cancer in New South Wales: incidence, mortality and prevalence report 2006. Sydney: Cancer Institute NSW; 2008.
March v Stramare (E & MH) Pty Ltd (1991) 171 CLR 506
Amaca Pty Ltd v Booth [2011] HCA 53
Amaca Pty Ltd v King [2011] VSCA 447
Amaca Pty Ltd v Ellis [2010] HCA 5
Further Reading
Dodson R, Hammar S, editors. Asbestos: risk assessment, epidemiology and health effects. 2nd ed. Boca Raton: Taylor and Francis; 2011. p. 1–22.
Le GV, Takahashi K, Park E-K, Delgermaa V, Oak C, Qureshi AM, Aljunid SM. Asbestos use and asbestos-related disease in Asia: past, present and future. Respirology. 2011;16:767–75.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this entry
Cite this entry
Burdon, J., Dimsey, A. (2013). Asbestos-Related Diseases – Their Aetiology and Medico-legal Issues: An Overview. In: Beran, R. (eds) Legal and Forensic Medicine. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32338-6_112
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32338-6_112
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-32337-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-32338-6
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesReference Module Biomedical and Life Sciences