Skip to main content

Encouraging Open Community Innovation: Outils-Réseaux’s Modular Approach

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Managing Open Innovation Technologies

Abstract

Increasingly, individuals, groups and communities are participating actively in the process of technological innovation. Indeed, the novelty of Web 2.0 technologies and platforms appears to lie in the fact that the user has the possibility to produce—and not just consult—a vast array of content and tools. Users are more and more aware of their capacity for making and changing technologies, but participation does not happen automatically for most people. This chapter is a case study of Outils-Réseaux, a French group whose mission is to encourage the development and use of collaborative tools by associative movements. Drawing on interviews and an analysis of the content of various Wiki pages, we reflect on how Outils-Réseaux’s actions and approach participate in community innovation, in which the community itself is an essential element of the innovation. We explore the coevolution of both technical infrastructure (tools for collaboration) and the community, and show how Outils-Réseaux mediates between the (social) world of users and the technical world of software developers. We place particular emphasis on the modularity of the group’s approach to illustrate how it helps reconfigure boundaries for innovation and collaboration. First, we outline Outils-Réseaux’s general approach and several guiding principles. We then describe several “success stories” that illustrate key elements of the approach: simplicity, modularity, user-driven innovation. We conclude with reflections on emergent, community innovation and relate our experiences to academic literature on open, collaborative innovation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Brest is well known for its focus on local capacity building, project-based organisation of community development initiatives and an extended network of multimedia and IT animators and facilitators.

References

  • Baldwin, C. Y. & von Hippel, E. (2009) Modeling a Paradigm Shift: From Producer Innovation to User and Open Collaborative Innovation. MIT Sloan School Working Paper 4764-09 Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1502864 (May 10, 2010)

  • Baldwin, C. Y., Hienerth, C., & von Hippel, E. (2006). How user innovations become commercial products: A theoretical investigation and a case study. Research Policy, 35(9), 1291–1313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, K. (2000). Extreme programming explained: Embrace change. Boston: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dittrich, Y. (2002). Doing empirical research on software development: Finding a path between understanding, intervention, and method development. In Y. Dittrich, C. Floyd, & R. Klischewski (Eds.), Social thinking-software practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, L., & Waguespack, D. M. (2007). Brokerage, boundary spanning, and leadership in open innovation communities. Organisation Science, 18(2), 165–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franke, N., & Schreier, M. (2002). Entrepreneurial opportunities with toolkits for user innovation and design. International Journal on New Media Management, 4(4), 225–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franke, N., & Shah, S. (2003). How communities support innovative activities: An exploration of assistance and sharing among end-users. Research Policy, 32(1), 157–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackay, H., Carne, C., Benyon-Davies, P., & Tudhope, D. (2000). Reconfiguring the user: Using rapid application development. Social Studies of Science, 30(5), 737–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millerand, F., & Baker, K. S. (2010). Who are the users? Who are the developers? Webs of users and developers in the development process of a technical standard. Information Systems Journal, 20(2), 137–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merkel, C. B., Clitherow, M., Farooq, U., Xiao, L., Ganoe, C. H., Carroll , J. M. & Rosson, M. B. (2005) Sustaining computer use and learning in community computing contexts: Making technology part of “who they are and what they do.” Journal of Community Informatics, 1(2). Retrieved from http://ci-journal.net/index.php/ciej/article/view/215/173 (May 10, 2010)

  • Perrenoud, P. (1983) La pratique pédagogique entre l’improvisation réglée et bricolage. Éducation & Recherche, n° 2, 198-212 (republished in Perrenoud, P. (1994) La formation des enseignants entre théorie et pratique, Paris, L’Harmattan, 21–41).

    Google Scholar 

  • Raymond, E. (1999). The cathedral and the bazaar: Musings on Linux and open source by an accidental revolutionary. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuler, D., & Namioka, A. (2003). Participatory design: Principles and practices. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Oost, E., Verhaegh, S., & Oudshoorn, N. (2009). From innovation community to community innovation: User‐initiated innovation in wireless Leiden. Science, Technology and Human Values, 34(2), 182–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  • Hyssalo, S. (2009). User innovation and everyday practices: Micro-innovation in sports industry development. R&D Management, 39(3), 247–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Hippel, E. (2001). Innovation by user communities: Learning from open-source software. MIT Sloan Management Review, 42(4), 82–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Hippel, E., & von Krogh, G. (2003). Open source software and the ‘private-collective’ innovation model: Issues for organisation science. Organisation Science, 14(2), 209–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) of Canada.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lorna Heaton .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Heaton, L., Millerand, F., Delon, D., Schmitt, F., Marseault, L., Deschamps, J. (2013). Encouraging Open Community Innovation: Outils-Réseaux’s Modular Approach. In: Eriksson Lundström, J., Wiberg, M., Hrastinski, S., Edenius, M., Ågerfalk, P. (eds) Managing Open Innovation Technologies. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31650-0_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics