Skip to main content

Statistic Versus Deterministic Method for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Landslide Science and Practice

Abstract

The present work aims to assess the landslide susceptibility of a hilly area, using two methods: the weight of evidence statistical method (WOE) that is based on bivariate statistical analysis and the deterministic approach based on the infinite slope model.

To document the efficiency of this quantitative methods, a landslide prone area along Prahova Subcarpathian Valley was chosen, where landslide hazard interacts with human settlement and activities.

The Landslide susceptibility map derived from the WOE method has been compared with that produced from the deterministic method and the results analyzed. The values obtained were also in good agreement with the field observations.

Results show that the main controlling factors in the evolution of landslides are the slope gradient, saturation condition and lithology. Beside these, factors like morphography (slope aspect and flow direction) or human intervention (land use, roads, buildings) can interfere.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aleotti P, Chowdhury R (1999) Landslide hazard assessment: summary review and new perspectives. Bull Eng Geol Env 58:21–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armaş I, Damian R (2006) Evolutive interpretation of the landslides from the Miron Căproiu street scarp (Eternităţii Street– V. Alecsandri Street) – Breaza Town. Revista de Geomorfologie 8:65–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Armaş I, Damian R, Şandric I, Osaci-Costache G (2003) Vulnerabilitatea versanţilor la alunecări de teren în sectorul subcarpatic al văii Prahova, Ed. Fundaţiei “România de Mâine”, Bucureşti

    Google Scholar 

  • Armas I, Sandric I, Damian R (2005) Assessing slopes vulnerability to landslides in tectonic active areas using The Bayesian and Dempster-Shafery probability models/Prahova valley/Romania. In: Proceedings of the European geosciences union, General Assembly, 24–29 Apr 2005, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Balteanu D, Cioaca A, Dinu M, Sandu M (1996) Some case studies of geomorphological risk in the Curvature Carpathians and Subcarpathians, RRG, 40

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbieri G, Cambuli P (2009) The weight of evidence statistical method in landslide susceptibility mapping of the Rio Pardu Valley (Sardinia, Italy). In: Proceedings of the 18th world IMACS/MODSIM congress, Cairns, 13–17 July 2009. http://mssanz.org.au/modsim09

  • Carrara A (1988) Landslide hazard mapping by statistical methods:a black box model approach. In: Proceedings of the workshop on natural disaster in European mediterranean countries. Perugia, Italy. Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche

    Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury RN (1976) Initial stresses in natural slope analysis. In: Rock engineering for slopes and excavations. Proceedings 1976, ASCE, Geotechnical Engineering. Specialty conference, Boulder, Colorado

    Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury RN, Bertoldi C (1977) Residual shear tests on soil from two natural slopes. Aust Geomechanics J G7:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Cioaca A (1996) Evaluarea vulnerabilităţii terenurilor afectate de procese geomorfologice actuale, AUŞMS-Geogr.- Geol., V, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  • Cioaca A, Balteanu D, Dinu M (1996) Studiul unor cazuri de risc geomorfologic în Carpaţii de la Curbură, SCGGG - Geogr., XL

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruden DM, Varnes DJ (1996) Landslide types and processes, Chapter 3. In: Turner AK, Schuster RL (eds) Landslides-investigation and mitigation, Transportation research board special report 247. National Research Council, Washington, DC, pp 36–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Grecu F (1999) Potential land uses in the Prahova Subcarpathian area. In: Geography within the context of contemporany development, Cluj University Press, Cluj Napoca, 6–7 june 1997

    Google Scholar 

  • Grecu F (2002) Risk-prone lands in hilly regions: mapping stages, applied geomorphology: theory and practice. Wiley, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Highland LM, Bobrowsky PT (2008) The landslide handbook – a guide to understanding landslides. USGS Circular 1325, 129 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Parichi M, Armaş I, Vartolomei F (2006) Evaluari pedologice şi morfodinamice pe valea Prahovei subcarpatice. An Spiru Haret 9:103–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Stroia F, Armaş I, Damian R (2005) Earth sliding recently revival in Breaza area on Prahova valley. In: Proceedings of international symposium on latest natural disasters-new challenges for engineering geology, geotechnics and civil protection. Organized by Bulgarian Nationl Group of IAEG, Abstract Book, p 93, printed on CD section 20-6-p, Sofia

    Google Scholar 

  • Terzaghi K (1950) Mechanism of landslides. In: Paige S (ed) Application of geology to engineering practice. Geol Soc Am 83–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson S, Turk T (1997) Introduction to Phisical Geologi, Landslides and relatid phenomena, chapter 5, pp 11–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner AK, Schuster RL (1996) Landslides: investigation and mitigation. Transport Research Board Special Report 247. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC, pp 36–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Varnes DJ (1978) Slope movements: types and processes. In: Schuster RL, Krizek RJ (eds) Landslides analysis and control, Transportation research board special report 176. National Research Council, Washington, DC, pp 11–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Varnes DJ (1984) Landslides hazard zonation: a review of principles and practice. UNESCO, Paris

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Iuliana Armas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Armas, I., Stroia, F., Giurgea, L. (2013). Statistic Versus Deterministic Method for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping. In: Margottini, C., Canuti, P., Sassa, K. (eds) Landslide Science and Practice. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31310-3_52

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics