Abstract
The present work aims to assess the landslide susceptibility of a hilly area, using two methods: the weight of evidence statistical method (WOE) that is based on bivariate statistical analysis and the deterministic approach based on the infinite slope model.
To document the efficiency of this quantitative methods, a landslide prone area along Prahova Subcarpathian Valley was chosen, where landslide hazard interacts with human settlement and activities.
The Landslide susceptibility map derived from the WOE method has been compared with that produced from the deterministic method and the results analyzed. The values obtained were also in good agreement with the field observations.
Results show that the main controlling factors in the evolution of landslides are the slope gradient, saturation condition and lithology. Beside these, factors like morphography (slope aspect and flow direction) or human intervention (land use, roads, buildings) can interfere.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aleotti P, Chowdhury R (1999) Landslide hazard assessment: summary review and new perspectives. Bull Eng Geol Env 58:21–44
Armaş I, Damian R (2006) Evolutive interpretation of the landslides from the Miron Căproiu street scarp (Eternităţii Street– V. Alecsandri Street) – Breaza Town. Revista de Geomorfologie 8:65–72
Armaş I, Damian R, Şandric I, Osaci-Costache G (2003) Vulnerabilitatea versanţilor la alunecări de teren în sectorul subcarpatic al văii Prahova, Ed. Fundaţiei “România de Mâine”, Bucureşti
Armas I, Sandric I, Damian R (2005) Assessing slopes vulnerability to landslides in tectonic active areas using The Bayesian and Dempster-Shafery probability models/Prahova valley/Romania. In: Proceedings of the European geosciences union, General Assembly, 24–29 Apr 2005, Vienna
Balteanu D, Cioaca A, Dinu M, Sandu M (1996) Some case studies of geomorphological risk in the Curvature Carpathians and Subcarpathians, RRG, 40
Barbieri G, Cambuli P (2009) The weight of evidence statistical method in landslide susceptibility mapping of the Rio Pardu Valley (Sardinia, Italy). In: Proceedings of the 18th world IMACS/MODSIM congress, Cairns, 13–17 July 2009. http://mssanz.org.au/modsim09
Carrara A (1988) Landslide hazard mapping by statistical methods:a black box model approach. In: Proceedings of the workshop on natural disaster in European mediterranean countries. Perugia, Italy. Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche
Chowdhury RN (1976) Initial stresses in natural slope analysis. In: Rock engineering for slopes and excavations. Proceedings 1976, ASCE, Geotechnical Engineering. Specialty conference, Boulder, Colorado
Chowdhury RN, Bertoldi C (1977) Residual shear tests on soil from two natural slopes. Aust Geomechanics J G7:1–9
Cioaca A (1996) Evaluarea vulnerabilităţii terenurilor afectate de procese geomorfologice actuale, AUŞMS-Geogr.- Geol., V, 1997
Cioaca A, Balteanu D, Dinu M (1996) Studiul unor cazuri de risc geomorfologic în Carpaţii de la Curbură, SCGGG - Geogr., XL
Cruden DM, Varnes DJ (1996) Landslide types and processes, Chapter 3. In: Turner AK, Schuster RL (eds) Landslides-investigation and mitigation, Transportation research board special report 247. National Research Council, Washington, DC, pp 36–75
Grecu F (1999) Potential land uses in the Prahova Subcarpathian area. In: Geography within the context of contemporany development, Cluj University Press, Cluj Napoca, 6–7 june 1997
Grecu F (2002) Risk-prone lands in hilly regions: mapping stages, applied geomorphology: theory and practice. Wiley, London
Highland LM, Bobrowsky PT (2008) The landslide handbook – a guide to understanding landslides. USGS Circular 1325, 129 p
Parichi M, Armaş I, Vartolomei F (2006) Evaluari pedologice şi morfodinamice pe valea Prahovei subcarpatice. An Spiru Haret 9:103–111
Stroia F, Armaş I, Damian R (2005) Earth sliding recently revival in Breaza area on Prahova valley. In: Proceedings of international symposium on latest natural disasters-new challenges for engineering geology, geotechnics and civil protection. Organized by Bulgarian Nationl Group of IAEG, Abstract Book, p 93, printed on CD section 20-6-p, Sofia
Terzaghi K (1950) Mechanism of landslides. In: Paige S (ed) Application of geology to engineering practice. Geol Soc Am 83–123
Thomson S, Turk T (1997) Introduction to Phisical Geologi, Landslides and relatid phenomena, chapter 5, pp 11–126
Turner AK, Schuster RL (1996) Landslides: investigation and mitigation. Transport Research Board Special Report 247. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC, pp 36–75
Varnes DJ (1978) Slope movements: types and processes. In: Schuster RL, Krizek RJ (eds) Landslides analysis and control, Transportation research board special report 176. National Research Council, Washington, DC, pp 11–33
Varnes DJ (1984) Landslides hazard zonation: a review of principles and practice. UNESCO, Paris
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Armas, I., Stroia, F., Giurgea, L. (2013). Statistic Versus Deterministic Method for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping. In: Margottini, C., Canuti, P., Sassa, K. (eds) Landslide Science and Practice. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31310-3_52
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31310-3_52
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31309-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31310-3
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)