Abstract
While proteins and nucleic acids are the fundamental components of an organism, Biology itself is based on the interactions they make with each other. Analyzing macromolecular interactions typically requires handling systems involving from two to hundreds of polypeptide chains. After a brief overview of the modeling challenges faced in computational structural biology, this chapter presents concepts and tools aiming at improving our understanding of the link between the static structures of macromolecular complexes and their biophysical/biological properties. We discuss geometrical approaches suited to atomic-resolution complexes and to large protein assemblies; for each, we also present examples of their successful application in quantifying and interpreting biological data. This methodology includes state-of-the-art geometric analyses of surface area, volume, curvature, and topological properties (isolated components, cavities, voids, cycles) related to Voronoï constructions in the context of structure analysis. On the applied side, we present novel insights into real biological problems gained thanks to these modeling tools.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
While single-chain proteins are common, one protein may include more than one polypeptide chain. Multiple chains are frequently covalently bonded via a disulfide bond formed between cysteine residues.
References
S.A. Adcock and J.A. McCammon. Molecular dynamics: survey of methods for simulating the activity of proteins. Chem Rev, 106(5):1589–1615, May 2006.
N. Akkiraju and E. Edelsbrunner. Triangulating the surface of a molecule. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 71(1):5–22, 1996.
F. Alber, S. Dokudovskaya, L.M. Veenhoff, W. Zhang, J. Kipper, D. Devos, A. Suprapto, O. Karni-Schmidt, R. Williams, B.T. Chait, M.P. Rout, and A. Sali. Determining the architectures of macromolecular assemblies. Nature, 450(7170):683–694, Nov 2007.
F. Alber, F. Forster, D. Korkin, M. Topf, and A. Sali. Integrating diverse data for structure determination of macromolecular assemblies. Ann. Rev. Biochem., 77:11.1–11.35, 2008.
R.P. Bahadur and M. Zacharias. The interface of protein-protein complexes: analysis of contacts and prediction of interactions. Cell Mol Life Sci, 65(7–8):1059–1072, Apr 2008.
J. Bernauer, J. Azé, J. Janin, and A. Poupon. A new protein-protein docking scoring function based on interface residue properties. Bioinformatics, 23(5):555–562, Mar 2007.
J. Bernauer, R.P. Bahadur, F. Rodier, J. Janin, and A. Poupon. DiMoVo: a Voronoi tessellation-based method for discriminating crystallographic and biological protein-protein interactions. Bioinformatics, 24(5):652–658, Mar 2008.
T.N. Bhat, G.A. Bentley, G. Boulot, M.I. Greene, D. Tello, W. Dall’Acqua, H. Souchon, F.P. Schwarz, R.A. Mariuzza, and R.J. Poljak. Bound water molecules and conformational stabilization help mediate an antigen-antibody association. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 91(3):1089–1093, Feb 1994.
J-D. Boissonnat and M. Yvinec. Algorithmic Geometry. Cambridge University Press, UK, 1998. Translated by Hervé Brönnimann.
A.M. Bonvin. Flexible protein-protein docking. Curr Opinion in Struct Biol, 16:1–7, 2006.
B. Bouvier, R. Grünberg, M. Nilges, and F. Cazals. Shelling the voronoi interface of protein-protein complexes reveals patterns of residue conservation, dynamics, and composition. Proteins, 76(3):677–692, Aug 2009.
F. Cazals and T. Dreyfus. Multi-scale geometric modeling of ambiguous shapes with toleranced balls and compoundly weighted α-shapes. In B. Levy and O. Sorkine, editors, Symposium on Geometry Processing, pages 1713–1722, Lyon, 2010. Also as Inria Tech report 7306.
T. Dreyfus, V. Doye, and F. Cazals. Assessing the reconstruction of macromolecular assemblies with toleranced models. Proteins: structure, function, and bioinformatics, 80(9), 2012.
F. Cazals, H. Kanhere, and S. Loriot. Computing the volume of union of balls: a certified algorithm. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, 38(1), 2011.
F. Cazals and C. Karande. An algorithm for reporting maximal c-cliques. Theoretical Computer Science, 349(3):484–490, 2005.
F. Cazals, F. Proust, R. Bahadur, and J. Janin. Revisiting the Voronoi description of protein-protein interfaces. Protein Science, 15(9):2082–2092, 2006.
P. Chakrabarti and J. Janin. Dissecting protein-protein recognition sites. Proteins, 47(3):334–343, May 2002.
P. Chakrabarti and J. Janin. Dissecting protein-protein recognition sites. Proteins, 47(3):334–43, 2002.
C. Chotia and J. Janin. Principles of protein-protein recognition. Nature, 256:705–708, 1975.
M.L. Connolly. Shape complementarity at the hemoglobin a1b1 subunit interface. Biopolymers, 25:1229–1247, 1986.
F. Dong and H-X. Zhou. Electrostatic contribution to the binding stability of protein-protein complexes. Proteins, 65(1):87–102, Oct 2006.
S. Dutta and H.M. Berman. Large macromolecular complexes in the protein data bank: a status report. Structure, 13:381, 2005.
H. Edelsbrunner. Weighted alpha shapes. Technical Report UIUCDCS-R-92-1760, Dept. Comput. Sci., Univ. Illinois, Urbana, IL, 1992.
H. Edelsbrunner. The union of balls and its dual shape. Discrete Comput. Geom., 13:415–440, 1995.
H. Edelsbrunner and J. Harer. Computational topology: an introduction. AMS, 2010.
H. Edelsbrunner and P. Koehl. The weighted-volume derivative of a space-filling diagram. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 100(5):2203–2208, Mar 2003.
J. Frank. Three-dimensional electron microscopy of macromolecular assemblies: visualization of biological molecules in their native state. Oxford University Press, USA, 2006.
M. Gerstein and C. Chothia. Packing at the protein-water interface. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 93(19):10167–10172, Sep 1996.
H. Gohlke and D.A. Case. Converging free energy estimates: MM-PB(GB)SA studies on the protein-protein complex Ras-Raf. J Comput Chem, 25(2):238–250, Jan 2004.
M. Grünwald, C. Dellago, and P.L. Geissler. Precision shooting: Sampling long transition pathways. J Chem Phys, 129(19):194101, Nov 2008.
M. Guharoy and P. Chakrabarti. Conservation and relative importance of residues across protein-protein interfaces. PNAS, 102(43):15447–15452, Oct 2005.
M. Guharoy and P. Chakrabarti. Conserved residue clusters at protein-protein interfaces and their use in binding site identification. BMC Bioinformatics, 11:286, 2010.
Y. Harpaz, M. Gerstein, and C. Chothia. Volume changes on protein folding. Structure, 2:641–649, 1994.
K-C. Hsia, P. Stavropoulos, G. Blobel, and A. Hoelz. Architecture of a coat for the nuclear pore membrane. Cell, 131(7):1313–1326, 2007.
Z. Hu, B. Ma, H. Wolfson, and R. Nussinov. Conservation of polar residues as hot spots at protein interfaces. Proteins, 39(4):331–342, Jun 2000.
J. Janin. Protein-protein docking tested in blind predictions: the CAPRI experiment. Mol Biosyst, 6(12):2351–62, Dec 2010.
J. Janin. X-ray study of protein-protein complexes and analysis of interfaces. In M. Zacharias, editor, Protein-Protein Complexes: Analysis, Modeling and Drug Design. Imperial College Press, London, 2010.
M. Kampmann and G. Blobel. Three-Dimensional Structure and Flexibility of a Membrane-Coating Module of the Nuclear Pore Complex. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol., 16(7):782–788, 2009.
P.L. Kastritis, I.H. Moal, H. Hwang, Z. Weng, P.A. Bates, A.M.J.J. Bonvin, and J. Janin. A structure-based benchmark for protein-protein binding affinity. Protein Sci, Jan 2011.
C.L. Lawson, M.L. Baker, C. Best, C. Bi, M. Dougherty, P. Feng, G. van Ginkel, B. Devkota, I.r Lagerstedt, S.J. Ludtke, R.H. Newman, T.J. Oldfield, I.R., G. Sahni, R. Sala, S. Velankar, J. Warren, J.D. Westbrook, K. Henrick, G. J Kleywegt, H.M. Berman, and W. Chiu. Emdatabank.org: unified data resource for cryoem. Nucleic Acids Res, 39(Database issue):D456–D464, Jan 2011.
Andrew R. Leach. Molecular modelling: principles and applications. Pearson Prentice Hall, 2009.
Emmanuel D Levy. Piqsi: protein quaternary structure investigation. Structure, 15(11):1364–1367, Nov 2007.
Olivier Lichtarge and Mathew E Sowa. Evolutionary predictions of binding surfaces and interactions. Curr Opin Struct Biol, 12(1):21–27, Feb 2002.
J. Liu and B. Rost. Sequence-based prediction of protein domains. Nucleic Acids Res, 32(12):3522–3530, 2004.
N. Malod-Dognin, A. Bansal, and F. Cazals. Characterizing the morphology of protein binding patches. Proteins: structure, function, and bioinformatics, in press, 2012.
I. Mihalek, I. Res, and O. Lichtarge. On itinerant water molecules and detectability of protein-protein interfaces through comparative analysis of homologues. J Mol Biol, 369(2):584–595, Jun 2007.
J. Mintseris, B. Pierce, K. Wiehe, R. Anderson, R. Chen, and Z. Weng. Integrating statistical pair potentials into protein complex prediction. Proteins, 69(3):511–520, Nov 2007.
M.A. Miteva, C.H. Robert, J.D. Maréchal, and D. Perahia. Receptor flexibility in ligand docking and virtual screening. In M. Miteva, editor, In-silico lead discovery. Bentham Science Publishers, 99–117, 2011.
S.K. Mohan and C. Yu. The il1alpha-s100a13 hetero-tetrameric complex structure: A component in the non-classical pathway for interleukin 1alpha secretion. J Biol Chem, Jan 2011.
K.L. Morrison and G.A. Weiss. Combinatorial alanine-scanning. Curr Opin Chem Biol, 5(3):302–307, Jun 2001.
A. Okabe, B. Boots, K. Sugihara, and S.N. Chiu. Spatial Tessellations: Concepts and Applications of Voronoi Diagrams (2nd Ed.). Wiley, 2000.
L. Pauling. General Chemistry, volume 5. Dover, 1988.
A. Poupon. Voronoi and voronoi-related tessellations in studies of protein structure and interaction. Curr Opin Struct Biol, 14(2):233–241, Apr 2004.
Antonio Rausell, David Juan, Florencio Pazos, and Alfonso Valencia. Protein interactions and ligand binding: from protein subfamilies to functional specificity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 107(5):1995–2000, Feb 2010.
D. Reichmann, O. Rahat, S. Albeck, R. Meged, O. Dym, and G. Schreiber. The modular architecture of protein-protein binding interfaces. PNAS, 102(1):57–62, 2005.
F.M. Richards. The interpretation of protein structures: total volume, group volume distributions and packing density. J Mol Biol, 82(1):1–14, Jan 1974.
D.W. Ritchie and V. Venkatraman. Ultra-fast fft protein docking on graphics processors. Bioinformatics, 26(19):2398–2405, Oct 2010.
P.W. Rose, B. Beran, C. Bi, W.F. Bluhm, D. Dimitropoulos, D.S. Goodsell, A. Prlic, M. Quesada, G.B. Quinn, J.D. Westbrook, J. Young, B. Yukich, C. Zardecki, H.M. Berman, and P.E. Bourne. The rcsb protein data bank: redesigned web site and web services. Nucleic Acids Res, 39(Database issue):D392–D401, Jan 2011.
L. Salmon, G. Bouvignies, P.R.L. Markwick, and M. Blackledge. Nmr provides a quantitative description of protein conformational flexibility on physiologically important timescales. Biochemistry, Mar 2011.
N. Schrader, P. Stelter, D. Flemming, R. Kunze, E. Hurt, and I.R. Vetter. Structural basis of the nic96 subcomplex organization in the nuclear pore channel. Molecular cell, 29(1):46–55, 2008.
H.S. Seo, Y. Ma, E.W. Debler, D. Wacker, S. Kutik, G. Blobel, and A. Hoelz. Structural and functional analysis of nup120 suggests ring formation of the nup84 complex. PNAS, pages 14281–14286, 2009.
D.E. Shaw, P. Maragakis, K. Lindorff-Larsen, S. Piana, R.O. Dror, M.P. Eastwood, J.A. Bank, J.M. Jumper, J.K. Salmon, Y. Shan, and W. Wriggers. Atomic-level characterization of the structural dynamics of proteins. Science, 330(6002):341–346, Oct 2010.
G.R. Smith, M.J.E. Sternberg, and P.A. Bates. The relationship between the flexibility of proteins and their conformational states on forming protein-protein complexes with an application to protein-protein docking. J Mol Biol, 347(5):1077–1101, Apr 2005.
T.A. Steitz. A structural understanding of the dynamic ribosome machine. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 9(3):242–53, Mar 2008.
N. Tuncbag, G. Kar, O. Keskin, A. Gursoy, and R. Nussinov. A survey of available tools and web servers for analysis of protein-protein interactions and interfaces. Briefings in bioinformatics, 10(3):217, 2009.
A. D. Wilkins, R. Lua, S. Erdin, R. M. Ward, and O. Lichtarge. Sequence and structure continuity of evolutionary importance improves protein functional site discovery and annotation. Protein Sci, 19(7):1296–1311, Jul 2010.
S. Wong, R.E. Amaro, and J.A. McCammon. Mm-pbsa captures key role of intercalating water molecules at a protein-protein interface. J Chem Theory Comput, 5(2):422–429, Feb 2009.
Acknowledgements
Joël Janin is acknowledged for insightful discussions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cazals, F., Dreyfus, T., Robert, C.H. (2013). Modeling Macromolecular Complexes: A Journey Across Scales. In: Cazals, F., Kornprobst, P. (eds) Modeling in Computational Biology and Biomedicine. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31208-3_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31208-3_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31207-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31208-3
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)