Skip to main content

Determining Granularity Level in Product Design Architecture

  • Conference paper
Smart Product Engineering

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Production Engineering ((LNPE))

Abstract

Product architecture represents components grouped into modules that can be assembled later to constitute a specific variant. Literature provides Methods of clustering components into weakly related modules with strong interconnections between components within modules. The number of modules and their hierarchical relationships shape product architecture and determine the balance between modular design and components integration. A novel hierarchical clustering approach, based on the biological Cladistics analysis, has been developed to cluster Design Structure Matrix (DSM) widely used to promote modularity. It evaluates different granularity levels of the resulting hierarchy and finds the best granularity level for maximum modularity. An automotive Body-in-White of 38 different components is used as a case study. Results showed the superiority of the recommended modularity pattern and synthesized product architecture over other clustering techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ulrich, K.T., Eppinger, S.D.: Product design and development, 5th edn. McGraw-Hill Irwin, Boston (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. ElMaraghy, H.: Changing and Evolving Products and Systems - Models and Enablers. In: ElMaraghy, H. (ed.) Changeable and Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems, ch. 2, pp. 25–45. Springer, London (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Xuehong, D., Jianxin, J., Tseng, M.M.: Architecture of product family: fundamentals and methodology. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications 9(Copyright 2002, IEE), 309–325 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  4. AlGeddawy, T., ElMaraghy, H.: Product Variety Management in Design and Manufac-turing: Challenges and Strategies. In: Proceeding of the 4th International Conference on Changeable, Agile, Reconfigurable and Virtual Production (CARV 2011), Montreal, Canada (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Eppinger, S.D., Browning, T.R.: Design structure matrix methods and applications. In: Engineering Systems 2012, xii, 334 p. MIT Press, Cambridge (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Thebeau, R.E.: Knowledge Management of System Interfaces and Interactions for Product development Processes. In: System Design and Management 2001. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tian-Li, Y., Yassine, A.A., Goldberg, D.E.: An information theoretic method for de-veloping modular architectures using genetic algorithms. Research in Engineering Design 18(2), 91–109 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pandremenos, J., Chryssolouris, G.: A neural network approach for the development of modular product architectures. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing 24(10), 879–887 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sharman, D.M., Yassine, A.A.: Characterizing complex product architectures. Systems Engineering 7(1), 35–59 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chiriac, N., Holtta-Otto, K., Lysy, D., Eun Suk, S.: Level of Modularity and Different Levels of System Granularity. Journal of Mechanical Design 133(10), 101007 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hennig, W.: Phylogenitic Systematics. University of Illinois Press, Urbana (1966); republished in 1999

    Google Scholar 

  12. ElMaraghy, H., AlGeddawy, T., Azab, A.: Modelling evolution in manufacturing: A biological analogy. CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology 57(1), 467–472 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Nixon, K.C.: The Parsimony Ratchet, a New Method for Rapid for Rapid Parsimony Analysis. Cladistics 15(1), 407–414 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Pandremenos, J., Chatzikomis, C., Chryssolouris, G.: On the Quantification of Interface Design Architectures. AIJSTPME 2(3), 41–48 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Millet, D., Yvars, P.-A., Tonnelier, P.: A method for identifying the worst recycling case: Application on a range of vehicles in the automotive sector. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 68(0), 1–13 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tarek AlGeddawy .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

AlGeddawy, T., ElMaraghy, H. (2013). Determining Granularity Level in Product Design Architecture. In: Abramovici, M., Stark, R. (eds) Smart Product Engineering. Lecture Notes in Production Engineering. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30817-8_52

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30817-8_52

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-30816-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-30817-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics