Skip to main content

Classifying Pathological Prostate Images by Fractal Analysis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Computational Intelligence in Image Processing

Abstract

This study presents an automated system for grading pathological prostate images based on texture features of multicategories including multiwavelets, Gaborfilters, gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) and fractal dimensions. Images are classified into appropriate grades by using k-nearest neighbor (k-NN) and support vector machine (SVM) classifiers. Experimental results show that a correct classification rate (CCR) of 93.7 % (or 92.7 %) can be achieved by fractal dimension (FD) feature set by using k-NN (or SVM) classifier without feature selection. If the FD feature set is optimized, the CCR of 94.2 % (or 94.1 %) can be achieved by using k-NN (or SVM) classifier. The CCR is promoted to 94.6 % (or 95.6 %) by k-NN (or SVM) classifier if features of multicategories are applied. On the other hand, the CCR drops if the FD-based features are removed from the combined feature set of multicategories. Such a result suggests that features of FD category are not negligible and should be included for consideration for classifying pathological prostate images.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Cancer Society: Cancer Facts & Figures 2007. American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zhu, Y., Williams, S., Zwiggelaar, R.: Computer technology in detection and staging of prostate carcinoma: a review. Med. Image Anal. 10, 178–199 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gleason, D.F.: The veteran’s administration cooperative urologic research group: histologic grading and clinical staging of prostatic carcinoma. In: Tannenbaum, M. (ed.) Urologic Pathology: The Prostate, pp. 171–198. Lea and Febiger, Philadephia, PA (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jafari-Khouzani, K., Soltanian-Zadeh, H.: Multiwavelet grading of pathological images of prostate. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 50, 607–704 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Baish, J.W., Jain, R.K.: Fractals and cancer. Cancer Res. 60, 3683–3688 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sarkar, N., Chaudhuri, B.B.: An efficient differential box-counting approach to compute fractal dimension of image. IEEE Transa. Syst. Man Cybern. 24, 115–120 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fukunaga, K.: Introduction to Statistical Pattern Recognition, 2nd edn. Academic Press, New York (1990)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Pudil, P., Novovicova, J., Kittler, J.: Floating search methods in feature selection. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 15, 1119–1125 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Shen, L.X., Tan, H.H., Tham, J.Y.: Symmetric-antisymmetric orthonormal multiwavelets and related scalar wavelets. Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal. (ACHA) 8, 258–279 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Jain, A.K., Farrokhnia, F.: Unsupervised texture segmentation using Gabor filters. Pattern Recognit. 24, 1167–1186 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pichler, O., Teuner, A., Hosticha, B.J.: A comparison of texture feature extraction using adaptive Gabor filtering, pyramidal and tree structured wavelet transforms. Pattern Recognit. 29, 733–742 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chaudhuri, B.B., Sarkar, N.: Texture segmentation using fractal dimension. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 17, 72–77 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Huang, P.W., Lee, C.H.: Automatic classification for pathological prostate images based on fractal analysis. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 28, 1037–1050 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kantardzic, M.: Data Mining: Concepts, Models, Methods, and Algorithms. Wiley, New Jersey (2002)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Wu, T.F., Lin, C.J., Weng, R.C.: Probability estimates for multi-class classification by pairwise coupling. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 5, 975–1005 (2004)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Chang, C.-C., Lin, C.-J.: LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines. Software http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/cjlin/libsvm (2001)

  17. Lee, W.L., Chen, Y.C., Hsieh, K.S.: Ultrasonic liver tissues classification by fractal feature vector based on M-band wavelet transform. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 22, 382–392 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Po-Whei Huang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Huang, PW., Lee, CH., Lin, PL. (2013). Classifying Pathological Prostate Images by Fractal Analysis. In: Chatterjee, A., Siarry, P. (eds) Computational Intelligence in Image Processing. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30621-1_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30621-1_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-30620-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-30621-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics