Abstract
As part of a knowledge-based approach to undertaking percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), appropriate selection and use of guiding catheters is a fundamental cornerstone in the training and performance of cardiovascular interventions. Correct decision-making pertaining to the selection of guiding catheters is recognized as one of the most significant determinants of success of any interventional, and particularly PCI, undertaking. Acquisition of cognitive and technical skills required for the development of guiding catheter strategies is critical to successful treatments; hence the aim of this chapter is to provide basic knowledge of guiding catheters including practical tips on usage.
The differences in functionality between diagnostic catheters and guiding catheters are outlined, with particular reference to their respective design features. Types of guiding catheter, especially with regard to the sizes and shapes currently available, are described in general and in subsequent sections elaborated upon with respect to the selection of appropriate guiding catheters according to the intended target vessel, route of arterial access, patient anatomical factors and type of interventional devices required. We hope this chapter will enable mastery of good guiding catheter strategy and technique, as tailored to the individual case, and prove ultimately beneficial to the care of patients.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Angelini P, Velasco JA, Flamm S (2002) Coronary anomalies: incidence, pathophysiology, and clinical relevance. Circulation 105:2449–2454
Aptecar E, Pernes JM, Chabane-Chaouch M, Bussy N, Catarino G, Shahmir A, Bougrini K, Dupouy P (2006) Transulnar versus transradial artery approach for coronary angioplasty: the PCVI-CUBA study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 67:711–720
Bertrand OF, Rao SV, Pancholy S, Jolly SS, Rodes-Cabau J, Larose E, Costerousse O, Hamon M, Mann T (2010) Transradial approach for coronary angiography and interventions: results of the first international transradial practice survey. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 3:1022–1031
Brueck M, Bandorski D, Kramer W, Wieczorek M, Holtgen R, Tillmanns H (2009) A randomized comparison of transradial versus transfemoral approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2:1047–1054
Burzotta F, Trani C, Hamon M, Amoroso G, Kiemeneij F (2008) Transradial approach for coronary angiography and interventions in patients with coronary bypass grafts: tips and tricks. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 72:263–272
Dahm JB, Vogelgesang D, Hummel A, Staudt A, Volzke H, Felix SB (2002) A randomized trial of 5 vs. 6 French transradial percutaneous coronary interventions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 57:172–176
De Bruyne B, Stockbroeckx J, Demoor D, Heyndrickx GR, Kern MJ (1994) Role of side holes in guide catheters: observations on coronary pressure and flow. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 33:145–152
Dunning DW, Kahn JK, Hawkins ET, O’Neill WW (2000) Iatrogenic coronary artery dissections extending into and involving the aortic root. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 51:387–393
Eichhofer J, Horlick E, Ivanov J, Seidelin PH, Ross JR, Ing D, Daly P, Mackie K, Ridley B, Schwartz L, Barolet A, Dzavik V (2008) Decreased complication rates using the transradial compared to the transfemoral approach in percutaneous coronary intervention in the era of routine stenting and glycoprotein platelet IIb/IIIa inhibitor use: a large single-center experience. Am Heart J 156:864–870
Elgharib NZ, Shah UH, Coppola JT (2009) Transradial cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention: a review. Coron Artery Dis 20:487–493
Grossman PM, Gurm HS, McNamara R, Lalonde T, Changezi H, Share D, Smith DE, Chetcuti SJ, Moscucci M (2009) Percutaneous coronary intervention complications and guide catheter size: bigger is not better. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2:636–644
Halpern EJ, Levin DC (2008) Normal coronary anatomy. In: Halpern EJ (ed) Clinical cardiac CT: anatomy and function. Thieme, New York, p 35
Hiwatashi A, Iwabuchi M, Yokoi H, Tayama S, Sakamoto T, Noda K, Shibata Y, Hikichi Y, Node K, Ueno T, Nobuyoshi M (2010) PCI using a 4-Fr “child” guide catheter in a “mother” guide catheter: Kyushu KIWAMI(R) ST registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 76:919–923
Jolly SS, Yusuf S, Cairns J, Niemela K, Xavier D, Widimsky P, Budaj A, Niemela M, Valentin V, Lewis BS, Avezum A, Steg PG, Rao SV, Gao P, Afzal R, Joyner CD, Chrolavicius S, Mehta SR (2011) Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial. Lancet 377:1409–1420
Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ, Odekerken D, Slagboom T, van der Wieken R (1997) A randomized comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by the radial, brachial and femoral approaches: the access study. J Am Coll Cardiol 29:1269–1275
Kumar S, Gorog DA, Secco GG, Di MC, Kukreja N (2010) The GuideLiner “child” catheter for percutaneous coronary intervention – early clinical experience. J Invasive Cardiol 22:495–498
Mamas M, D’Souza S, Hendry C, Ali R, Iles-Smith H, Palmer K, El-Omar M, Fath-Ordoubadi F, Neyses L, Fraser DG (2010) Use of the sheathless guide catheter during routine transradial percutaneous coronary intervention: a feasibility study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 75:596–602
Mizuno S, Takeshita S, Taketani Y, Saito S (2010) Percutaneous coronary intervention using a virtual 3-Fr guiding catheter. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 75:983–988
Pritchard CL, Mudd JG, Barner HB (1975) Coronary ostial stenosis. Circulation 52:46–48
Takahashi S, Saito S, Tanaka S, Miyashita Y, Shiono T, Arai F, Domae H, Satake S, Itoh T (2004) New method to increase a backup support of a 6 French guiding coronary catheter. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 63:452–456
Yildiz A, Okcun B, Peker T, Arslan C, Olcay A, Bulent VM (2010) Prevalence of coronary artery anomalies in 12,457 adult patients who underwent coronary angiography. Clin Cardiol 33:E60–E64
Yip HK, Wu CJ, Yeh KH, Hang CL, Fang CY, Hsieh KY, Fu M (2001) Unusual complication of retrograde dissection to the coronary sinus of valsalva during percutaneous revascularization: a single-center experience and literature review. Chest 119:493–501
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tharmaratnam, D., Rothman, M.T., Jain, A. (2013). Guiding Catheters. In: Lanzer, P. (eds) Catheter-Based Cardiovascular Interventions. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27676-7_28
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27676-7_28
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-27675-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-27676-7
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)