Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Die Geburtshilfe pp 819–866Cite as

Pathologische Geburt

  • Chapter

Zusammenfassung

Prophylaxe, Diagnose und Therapie von Störungen des Geburtsablaufes gehören zu den zentralen geburtsmedizinischen Aufgaben. Das vorliegende Kapitel ist nach pathogenetischen wie auch praktisch wichtigen Problemstellungen gegliedert.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Literatur

  • ACOG (2003) Dystocia and augmentation of labor. Practice Bulletin No 49, Dec 2003, reaffirmed 2007

    Google Scholar 

  • ACOG (2004) Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery. Practice Bulletin Nr. 54, July 2004

    Google Scholar 

  • ACOG (1999) Induction of Labor. Practice Bulletin No. 10, Nov 1999

    Google Scholar 

  • Adair CD, Sanchez-Ramos L, Whitaker D, McDyer DC, Farah L, Briones D (1996) Trial of labor in patients with a previous lower uterine vertical cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol 174: 966–970

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Akmal S, Tsoi E, Howard R, Osei E, Nicolaides KH (2004) Investigation of occiput posterior delivery by intrapartum sonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 24: 425–428

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Albers LL (1999) The duration of labor in healthy women. J Perinatol 19(2): 114–119

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Allman ACJ, Genevier ESG, Johnson MR, Steer PJ (1996a) Head-tocervix force: an important physiological variable in labour. 1. The temporal relation between head-to-cervix force and intrauterine pressure during labour. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 103: 763–768

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Allman ACJ, Genevier ESG, Johnson MR, Steer PJ (1996b) Head-to-cervix force: an important physiological variable in labour. 2. Peak active force, peak active pressure and mode of delivery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 103: 769–775

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Asakura H, Myers SA (1995) More than one previous cesarean delivery: a 5-year experience with 435 patients. Obstet Gynecol 85: 924–929

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beazley JM (1995) Special circumstances affecting labour. In: Whitfield CR Dewhurst’s textbook of obstetrics and gynaecology for postgraduates, 5th edn. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 312–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Borell U, Fernström I (1981) Der Geburtsmechanismus. In: Käser O, Friedberg V, Ober KG, Thomsen K, Zander J Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, 2. Aufl, Bd II/2. Thieme, Stuttgart, S 10.57–10.81

    Google Scholar 

  • Bumm E (1919) Grundriss zum Studium der Geburtshilfe, 12. Aufl. Bergmann, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  • Cahill AG, Macones GA (2007) Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: Evidence-based practice. Clin Obstet Gynecol 50(2): 518–525

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell WE, Moloy HC (1933) Anatomical variations in the female pelvis and their effect in labor with a suggested classification. Am J Obstet Gynecol 26: 439

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers B, Wolman W (1993) Social support in labor – a selective review. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 14: 1–15

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chazotte C, Madden R, Cohen WR (1990) Labor patterns in women with previous cesareans. Obstet Gynecol 75: 350–355

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chen MM, Coakley FV, Kaimal A, Laros Jr RK (2008) Guidelines for computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging use during pregnancy and lactation. Obstet Gynecol 112; 333–340

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng YW, Hopkins LM, Caughey AB (2004) How long is too long: Does a prolonged second stage of labor in nulliparous women affect maternal and neonatal outcomes? Am J Obstet Gynecol 191 (3): 933–938

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng YW, Hopkins LM, Laros RK Jr, Caughey AB (2007) Duration of the second stage of labor in multiparous women: maternal and neonatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 196 (6): 585.e1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng YW, Shaffer BL, Caughey AB (2006) Associated factors and outcomes of persistent occiput posterior position: A retrospective cohort study from 1976 to 2001. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 19 (9): 563–568

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng YW, Shaffer BL, Caughey AB (2006) The association between persistent occiput posterior position and neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 107 (4): 837–844

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chibbar R, Miller FD, Mitchell BF (1993) Synthesis of oxytocin in amnion, chorion, and decidua may influence the timing of human parturition. J Clin Invest 91: 185–192

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clark S, Belfort M, Saade G, Hankins G, Miller D, Frye D, Meyers J (2007) Implementation of a conservative checklist-based protocol for oxytocin administration: maternal and newborn outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 197: 480.e1–480.e5. Editorial by Freeman RK, Nageotte M 197: 445–446

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark SL Rice Simpson K, Knox GE, Garite TJ (2009) Oxytocin: new perspectives on an old drug. Am J Obstet Gynecol 200: 35.e1–35.e6

    Google Scholar 

  • Colcher AE, Sussmann W (1994) A practical technique for roentgen pelvimetry with a new positioning. Am J Roentgenol 51: 207–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowther C, Enkin M, Keirse MJNC, Brown I (1989). Monitoring the progress of labour. In: Chalmers I, Enkin M, Keirse MJNC Effective care in pregnancy and childbirth, vol 2. Oxford University Press, pp 833–845

    Google Scholar 

  • DGGG (2008a) Vaginal-operative Entbindungen. Leitlinie AWMF 015/023 (S1) [www.dggg.de/_download/unprotected/g_03_04_ 06_vaginaloperative_entbindungen.pdf] (Stand August 2008)

  • DGGG (2008b) Schwangerenbetreuung und Geburtseinleitung bei Zustand nach Kaiserschnitt. Leitlinie AWMF 015/021 (S1) [www. dggg.de/_download/unprotected/g_03_04_05_schwangerenbetreuung_ geburtsleitung_kaiserschnitt.pdf] (Stand August 2008)

  • Dizon-Townson D, Ward K (1997) The genetics of labor. Clin Obstet Gynecol 40: 479–484

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dudenhausen JW (2008) Praktische Geburtshilfe mit geburtshilflichen Operationen, 20. Aufl. De Gruyter, Berlin Dudley DJ (1997) Oxytocin: Use and abuse, science and art. Clin Obstet Gynecol 40: 516–524

    Google Scholar 

  • Dürig P, Schneider H (2001) Einmal Sectio caesarea immer Sectio caesarea: Wieder zutreffend? In: Huch A, Chaoui R, Huch R Sectio caesarea. Uni-Med, Bremen

    Google Scholar 

  • Enkin M (1989) Labour and delivery following previous caesarean section. In: Chalmers I, Enkin M, Keirse MJNC Effective care in pregnancy and childbirth, vol 2. Oxford University Press, pp 1196–1215

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer WM (1981a) Formen der Uterusmotilitätsstörungen. In: Fischer WM Kardiotokographie. Diagnostische Methoden in der Perinatologie. Thieme, Stuttgart, S 120–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer WM (1981b) Herzfrequenzmuster in der Austreibungsperiode und ihre klinische Signifikanz. In: Fischer WM Kardiotokographie. Diagnostische Methoden in der Perinatologie. Thieme, Stuttgart, S 269–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser WD, Turcot L, Krauss I, Brisson-Carrol G (2001) Amniotomy for shortening spontaneous labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Issue 2

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman EA (1978) Labor: Clinical evaluation and management, 2nd edn. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardberg M, Laakkonen E, Sälevaara M (1998) Intrapartum sonography and persistent occiput posterior position: a study of 408 deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 91: 746–749

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garite TJ, Weeks J, Peters-Phair K, Pattillo C, Brewster WR (2000) A randomized controlled trial of the effect of increased intravenous hydration on the course of labor in nulliparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183: 1544–1548

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ghi T, Farina A, Pedrazzi A, Rizzo N, Pelusi G, Pilu G (2009) Diagnosis und station and rotation of the fetal head in the second stage of labor with intrapartum translabial ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 33; 331–336

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer G (2005) Das 1x1 der Skepsis. 2. Aufl. Berliner Taschenbuchverlag

    Google Scholar 

  • Grobman WA, Lai Y, Landon MB et al. (2008) Prediction of uterine rupture associated with attempted vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 199: 30.e1–30.e5

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guise JM, Hashima J, Osterweil P (2005) Evidence-based vaginal birth after Caesarean section. Best Practice & Research Clin Obstet Gynaecol 19 (1): 117–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harlass FE, Duff P (1990) The duration of labor in primiparas undergoing vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 75: 45–47

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hohlfeld P, Thierfelder C, Jäger F (2005) Patientinnen mit genitaler Beschneidung (Guidelines): Schweiz Ärztez 86: 951–960

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes EJ, Weinstein L (2008) Improving patient safety and uniformity of care by a standardized regimen for the use of oxytocin. Am J Obstet Gynecol 198: 622.e1–622.e7

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Janni W, Schiessl B, Peschers U, Huber S, Strobl B, Hantschmann P, Uhlmann N, Dimpfl T, Rammel G, Kainer F (2002) The prognostic impact of a prolonged second stage of labor on maternal and fetal outcome. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 81: 214–221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jastrow N, Antonelli E, Robyr R, Irion O, Boulvain M (2006) Inter- and intraobserver variability in sonographic measurement of the lower uterine segment after a previous caesarean section. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 27: 420–424

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson N, Johnson VA, Gupta JK (1991) Maternal positions during labor. Obstet Gynecol Surv 46: 428–434

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Juntunen K, Kirkinen P (1994) Partogram of a grand multipara: differentdescent slope compared with an ordinary parturient. J Perinat Med 22: 213–218

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kalache KD, Dückelmann AM, Michaelis SAM, Lange J, Cichon G, Dudenhausen (2009) Transperineal ultrasound imaging in prolonged second stage of labor with occipitoanterior presenting fetuses: how well does the ‚angle of progression‘ predict the mode of delivery? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 33: 326–330

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Käser O, Richter R (1981) Geburt aus Kopflage. In: Käser O, Friedberg V, Ober KG, Thomsen K, Zander J Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, 2. Aufl, Bd II/2. Thieme, Stuttgart, S 12.30–12.65

    Google Scholar 

  • Keirse MJNC (1989) Augmentation of labour. In: Chalmers I, Enkin M, Keirse MJNC Effective care in pregnancy and childbirth, vol 2. Oxford University Press, pp 951–966

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirchhoff H (1974) Der Geburtsmechanismus beim »Langen Becken«. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 34: 418–425

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kirchhoff H (1983) Beckenanomalien – ihre klinische Bedeutung heute. Diagnostik und Konsequenzen. Gynäkol Prax 7: 19–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Kobelin CG (2001) Intrapartum management of vaginal birth after cesarean section. Clin Obstet Gynecol 44: 588–593

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krauss T, Osmers R, Westerfeld S, Metzger I, Puchta J, Kuhn W (1997) Die Bedeutung des Langen Beckens nach Kirchhoff in der heutigen Geburtshilfe. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol 201: 247–252

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Link G, Künzel W (2003) Überwachung und Leitung der Geburt aus Schädellage. In: Künzel W Geburt I. Klinik der Frauenheilkundeund Geburtshilfe, 4. Aufl, Bd 6. Urban & Fischer, München, Jena S 154–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Landon MB, Leindecker S, Spong CY et al. (2005) The MFMU Cesarean Registry: Factors affecting the success of trial of labor after previous caesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193: 1016–1023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Le Ray C, Carayol M, Jaquemin S, Mignon A, Cabrol D, Goffinet F (2005) Is epidural analgesia a risk factor for occiput posterior or transverse positions during labour? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 123: 22–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Le Ray C, Serres P, Schmitz T, Cabrol D, Goffinet F (2007) Manual rotation in occiput posterior or transverse positions: risk factors and consequences on the cesarean delivery rate. Obstet Gynecol 110: 873–879

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman E (2001) Risk factors of uterine rupture during a trial of labor after cesarean. Clin Obstet Gynecol 44: 609–621

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman E, Davidson K, Lee Parritz A, Shearer E (2005) Changes in fetal position during labor and their association with epidural analgesia. Obstet Gynecol 105: 974–982

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lim A, Kwee A, Bruinse HW (2005) Pregnancy after uterine rupture: A report of 5 cases and a review of the literature. Obstet Gynecol Survey 60 (9): 613–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt VL, Easterling TR, Martin DP (2001) Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery. New Engl J Med 345: 3–8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Main DM, Main EK, Moore DH (2000) The relationship between maternal age and uterine dysfunction: A continuous effect throughout reproductive life. Am J Obstet Gynecol 182: 1312–1320

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martius G (1985) Lehrbuch der Geburtshilfe, 11. Aufl. Thieme, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Melamed N, Ben-Haroush A, Chen R, Kaplan B, Yogev Y (2009) Intrapartum cervical lacerations: characteristics, risk factors, and effects on subsequent pregnancies. Am J Obstet 200: 388.e1–388. e4

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy DJ, MacKenzie IZ (1995) The mortality and morbidity associated with umbilical cord prolapse. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 102: 826–830

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ofir K, Sheiner E, Levy A, Katz M, Mazor M (2004) Uterine rupture: Differences between a scarred and an unscarred uterus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191: 425–429

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Olàh KS, Gee H Brown JS (1993) Cervical contractions: the response of the cervix to oxytocic stimulation in the latent phase of labour. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 100: 635–640

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Sullivan G (1994) The stomach – fact and fantasy: eating and drinking during labor. Int Anesthesiol Clin 32: 31–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pattinson RC, Farrell EE (1997) Pelvimetry for fetal cephalic presentations at or near term. Cochrane Database for Systematic Reviews 1997, Issue 2 (lastassessed as up-to-date: 26 June 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearl ML, Roberts JM, Laros RK, Hurd WW (1993) Vaginal delivery from the persistent occiput posterior position. J Reprod Med 38: 955–961

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ponkey SE, Cohen AP, Heffner LJ, Lieberman E (2003) Persistent fetal occiput posterior position: Obstetric outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 101: 915–920

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Porreco RP, Clark SL, Belfort MA, Dildy GA, Meyers JA (2009) The changing specter of uterine rupture. Am J Obstet Gynecol 200;269.e1–269.e4

    Google Scholar 

  • Pridjian G (1992) Labor after prior cesarean section. Clin Obstet Gynecol 35: 445–456

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard JA, MacDonald PC, Gant NF (1985) Williams Obstetrics. 17th edn. Appleton-Century-Crofts, Norwalk/CT

    Google Scholar 

  • Rageth JC, Juzi C, Großenbacher H (1999) Delivery after previous cesarean: a risk evaluation. Swiss Working Group of Obstetric and Gynecologic Institutions. Obstet Gynecol 93: 332–337

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ragosch V, Altinöz H, Hundertmark H, Entezami M (1997) Einfluss des mütterlichen Alters auf den Geburtsverlauf – Analyse bei Frauen über 40 Jahre. Z Geburtsh Neonatol 201: 86–90

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • RCOG (2008) Umbilical cord prolapse. Green-top Guideline No. 50. April 2008 [www.rcog.org.uk/files/rcog-corp/uploaded-files/ GT50UmbilicalCordProlapse2008.pdf]

  • RCOG (2007) Birth after previous caesarean delivery. Green-top Guideline No. 45. http: //www.rcog.org.uk/files/rcog-corp/uploaded-files/GT45BirthAfterPreviousCeasarean.pdf

  • Rozenberg P (2007) Quelle place pour la radiopelvimétrie au XXIe siècle? (Is there a role for X-ray pelvimetry in the twenty-first century?) Gynecol Obstet Fert 35 (1): 6–12

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez-Ramos L, Quillen MJ, Kaunitz AM (1996) Randomized trial of oxytocin alone and with propranolol in the management of dysfunctional labor. Obstet Gynecol 88: 517–520

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider H, Beller FK (1997) Die Bedeutung des Hypoxierisikos bei der Geburt – eine Neubeurteilung. Frauenarzt 38: 324–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider H, Husslein P (2004) Geburtseinleitung. Gynäkologe 37 (4): 303–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sizer AR, Nirmal DM (2000) Occipitoposterior position: Associated factors and obstetric outcome in nulliparas. Obstet Gynecol 96: 749–752

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sizer AR, Evans J, Bailey SM, Wiener J (2000) A second-stage partogram. Obstet Gynecol 96: 678–683

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spong CY, Landon MB, Gilbert S et al. (2007) Risk of uterine rupture and adverse perinatal outcome at term after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 110; 801–807

    Google Scholar 

  • Spörri S, Gyr T, Schollerer A, Werlen S, Schneider H (1994) Methoden, Techniken und Beurteilungskriterien der geburtshilflichen Pelvimetrie. Z Geburtsh Perinatol 198: 37–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Spörri S, Hänggi W, Braghetti A, Vock P, Schneider H (1997) Pelvimetry by magnetic resonance imaging as a diagnostic tool to evaluate dystocia. Obstet Gynecol 89: 902–908

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stone C, Halliday J, Lumley J, Brennecke S (2000) Vaginal births after cesarean (VBAC): a population study. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol (England) 14: 340–348

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Treacy A, Robson M, O’Herlihy C (2006) Dystocia increases with advancing maternal age. Am J Obstet Gynecol 195 (3): 760–763

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thurnau GR, Hales KA, Morgan MA (1992) Evaluation of the fetal-pelvic relationship. Clin Obstet Gynecol 35: 570–581

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vacca A (2002) Vacuum-assisted delivery. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 16: 17–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vanner T, Gardosi J (1996) Intrapartum assessment of uterine activity. Baillière’s Clin Obstet Gynaecol 10: 243–257

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weissmann A, Jakobi P, Zahi S, Zimmer EZ (1990) The effect of cervical cerclage on the course of labor. Obstet Gynecol 76: 168–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Westin B (1987) X-ray pelvimetry. In: Langnickel D Problems ofthe pelvic passageway. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 3–14

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • WHO (1994) World Health Organization partograph in management of labour. World Health Organization Maternal Health and Safe Motherhood Programme. Lancet 343: 1399–1404. (Comment in: Lancet 344: 193)

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO (2005) WHO systematic review of maternal mortality and morbidity: the prevalence of uterine rupture. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 112: 1221–1228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wischnik A, Lehmann KJ, Zahn K, Georgi M, Melchert F (1992) Veränderungen der pelvinen Anatomie in 8 Jahrzehnten – Computertomographische Untersuchungen zu geburtshilflich relevanten Beckenmassen. Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol 196: 49–54

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wong CA, Scavone BM, Peaceman AM, McCarthy RJ, Sullivan JT, Diaz NT et al. (2005) The risk of cesarean delivery with neuraxial analgesia given early versus late in labor. N Engl J Med 352 (7): 655–665

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wong CA, McCarthy RJ, Sullivan JT, Scavone BM, Gerber SE, Yaghmour EA (2009) Early compared with late neuroaxial analgesia in nulliparouslabor induction. Obstet Gynecol 113 (5); 1066–1074

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Frauenklinik, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, Rorschacher Strasse 95, St. Gallen, 9007, Schweiz

    Dr. med. G. Drack

  2. Inselspital Bern, Ehem. Direktor und Chefarzt der Universitätsfrauenklinik am, Ahornweg 4, 3122, Kehrsatz, Schweiz

    H. Schneider

Authors
  1. Dr. med. G. Drack
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. H. Schneider
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Univ.Klinikum Bern Frauenklinik, Bern, Schweiz

    Henning Schneider

  2. Klinische Abt. Geburtshilfe und Feto-maternale Medizin, Medizinische Universität Wien Universitätsklinik für Frauenheilkunde, Wien, Österreich

    Peter-Wolf Husslein

  3. Frauenklinik und Poliklinik Abt. Perinatalmedizin, TU München Klinikum Rechts der Isar, München, Deutschland

    Karl Theo Maria Schneider

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Drack, G., Schneider, H. (2011). Pathologische Geburt. In: Schneider, H., Husslein, PW., Schneider, K. (eds) Die Geburtshilfe. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12974-2_38

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12974-2_38

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-40181-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-12974-2

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation