Skip to main content

Stormwater Runoff Treatment Filtration System and Backwashing System

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
New Trends in Urban Drainage Modelling (UDM 2018)

Part of the book series: Green Energy and Technology ((GREEN))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This study has been carried out to evaluate the applicability of the pilot scale the hybrid type of stormwater runoff treatment systems (SFS) for treatment of combined sewer overflow. And, to determine the optimum operation parameter such as coagulation dosage concentration, effectiveness of coagulant usage, surface loading rate and backwashing conditions. The SFS system is consisted of hydrocyclone coagulation/flocculation with polyaluminium chloride silicate (PACS) and upflow filter to treat combined sewer overflows. There are two modes (without PACS use and with PACS use) of operation for STS system. In case of without coagulant use, the range of SS, turbidity removal efficiency were 72.0–86.6% (mean 80.0%), 30.9–71.1% (mean 49.3%), respectively. And, the recovery rate of filter was 79.2–83.6% (mean 81.2%) the rate of remained solid loading in filter media was 16.4–20.8% (mean 18.8%) after backwashing. In case of SFS run with coagulant use, The range of influent flowrate and surface overflow rate were 6.8–8.0 m3/day (mean 7.2 m3/day), 163.2–191.8 m3/m2/day (mean 172.4 m3/m2/day), respectively. The influent turbidity, SS concentrations were 59.0–90.7 NTU (mean 72.0 NTU), 194.0–320.0 mg/L (mean 246.7 mg/L), respectively. The range of PACS dosage concentration was 6.0–7.1 mg/L (mean 6.7 mg/L). The range of SS, turbidity removal efficiency were 84.9–98.2 (mean 91.4%), 70.7–96.3 (mean 84.0%), respectively. It was found that removal efficiency was enhanced with PACS dosage. The recovery rate of filter was 92.0–92.5% (mean 92.3%) the rate of remained solid loading in filter media was 6.1–8.2% (mean 7.2%) after backwashing. In case of coagulant use, the particle size of effluent is bigger than influent particle size. The results showed that STS with PACS use more effective than without PACS use in SS and turbidity removal efficiency and recovery rate of filter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Balmforth, D.J.: The pollution aspects of storm-sewage overflows. Water Environ. J. 4(3), 219–226 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chow, M.F., Yusop, Z.: Characterization and source identification of stormwater runoff in tropical urban catchments. Water Sci. Technol. 69(2), 244–251 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaters, F.J., et al.: Particle size distribution variance in untreated urban runoff and its implication on treatment selection. Water Res. 85, 337–345 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sartor, J.D., et al.: Water pollution aspects of street surface contaminants. J. WPCF 46(3), 458–467 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebeling, J.M., et al.: Evaluation of chemical coagulation-flocculation aids for the removal of suspended solids and phosphorus from intense recirculating aquaculture effluence discharge. Aquaculture Eng. 29, 23–42 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Gendy, A.S., et al.: Treatment of combined sewer overflow using retention treatment basin assisted with polymer chemical coagulation. Water Environ. Res. 80(9), 763–774 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El Samrani, A.G., et al.: Chemical coagulation of combined sewer overflow: heavy metal removal and treatment optimization. Water Res. 42, 951–960 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filtration + Seperation (March/April 2010): Wastewater treatment: enhanced biological treatment of storm flows

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, Y., Zhu, D.Z.: Improving sediment removal in standard stormwater sumps. Water Sci. Technol. 69(10), 2099–2104 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shimadzu Corporation: Particle Size Analyzer Model: SALD-2101

    Google Scholar 

  • Torres, A., Bertrand-Krajewski, J.L.: Evaluation of uncertainties in settling velocities of particles in urban stormwater runoff. Water Sci. Technol. 57(9), 1389–1395 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (No. 2017R1D1A1B03033724).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. H. Lee .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Lee, J.H., Lee, M.J., Yang, S.H. (2019). Stormwater Runoff Treatment Filtration System and Backwashing System. In: Mannina, G. (eds) New Trends in Urban Drainage Modelling. UDM 2018. Green Energy and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99867-1_153

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99867-1_153

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-99866-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-99867-1

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics