Abstract
The continued rise of prescription drug spend, in particular specialty drugs has created the need for high-quality, low-cost options for biologics. The passage of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) created an FDA approval pathway for biosimilars, but that is the tip of the iceberg as it pertains to how a biosimilar will actually get to the patient. As a general rule, legislation contains very little detail and requires much regulatory guidance by various government agencies to be developed to facilitate a product coming to market. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) is the primary federal agency to provide guidance on the Medicare coverage, coding and payment for biosimilars in the US. CMS will also provide some guidance on the use of biosimilars in state Medicaid programs; however, much of that detail will be determined by the state program. Commercial health plans will also weigh in with their own coverage decisions, but typically follow the coding of biosimilars as set forth by CMS. This chapter will assess the existing reimbursement landscape for biosimilars and will address key considerations and implications around current decisions that will impact biosimilars’ market entry in the US.
In many ways, payers, governmental and commercial, will determine the ultimate success of biosimilars in the US by developing benefit designs and provider and patient incentives to drive biosimilar use. This chapter will explore how lessons on biosimilar incentive structures can be gleaned from the European experience and highlight what payer activity we have seen to date with marketed biosimilars in the US.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
ADVI Health. July 2017.
Avalere Health. Medicare beneficiaries will pay more for biosimilars than for their biologic reference products in Part D. 2018. http://avalere.com/expertise/life-sciences/insights/medicare-beneficiaries-will-pay-more-for-biosimilars-than-for-their-biologi.
Biosimilar Development. Biosimilars forum applauds senator roberts, reps. barton, eshoo for leadership on medicare policy on biosimilar coding. 2017a. https://www.biosimilardevelopment.com/doc/biosimilars-forum-senator-roberts-reps-barton-eshoo-medicare-biosimilar-coding-0001.
Biosimilar Development. CMS’ coverage gap is a significant challenge for biosimilars. 2017b. https://www.biosimilardevelopment.com/doc/cms-coverage-gap-is-a-significant-challenge-for-biosimilars-0001.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Medicaid biosimilars website. 2016. https://www.medicaid.gov/Medicaid-CHIP-Program-Information/By-Topics/Prescription-Drugs/Downloads/Rx-Releases/MFR-Releases/mfr-rel-103.pdf.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Part B average sales price files. 2017a. https://www.cms.gov/apps/ama/license.asp?file=/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Part-B-Drugs/McrPartBDrugAvgSalesPrice/Downloads/2017-July-ASP-Pricing-File.zip.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. CY2018 medicare physician fee schedule final rule. Published November 2017b. https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2017-11-15/pdf/2017-23953.pdf.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. CMS proposes policy changes and updates for medicare advantage and the prescription drug benefit program for contract year 2019 (CMS-4182-P). November 2017c. https://www.cms.gov/Newsroom/MediaReleaseDatabase/Fact-sheets/2017-Fact-Sheet-items/2017-11-16.html.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Medicaid drug rebate program. 2017d. https://www.medicaid.gov/medicaid/prescription-drugs/medicaid-drug-rebate-program/index.html.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Part B payment website. 2018a. https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Part-B-Drugs/McrPartBDrugAvgSalesPrice/Part-B-Biosimilar-Biological-Product-Payment.html.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Medicaid enrollment website. 2018b. https://www.medicaid.gov/medicaid/program-information/medicaid-and-chip-enrollment-data/report-highlights/index.html.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Medicaid managed care website. 2018c. https://www.medicaid.gov/medicaid/managed-care/index.html.
Covance Inc. Biosimilars: the commercial challenge. 2014. https://www.covance.com/content/dam/covance/assetLibrary/whitepapers/Biosimilars-WPCMA001.pdf.
Department of Health and Human Services. States’ collection of offset and supplemental rebates – OIG report. December 2014 https://oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-03-12-00520.pdf.
European Medicines Agency, Biosimilars in the EU: information guide for healthcare professionals. 2017. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Leaflet/2017/05/WC500226648.pdf.
FTC. Federal trade commission report. 2009. https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/documents/reports/emerging-health-care-issues-follow-biologic-drug-competition-federal-trade-com-mission-report/p083901biologicsreport.pdf.
Health Affairs–Health Policy Briefs. Specialty pharmaceuticals. November 2013. http://www.healthaffairs.org/healthpolicybriefs/brief.php?brief_id=103.
IMS Health. Delivering on the potential of biosimilar medicine: the role of functioning competitive markets. Parsippany, NJ: IMS Health; 2016a.
IMS Health. The impact of biosimilar competition. Parsippany, NJ: IMS Health; 2016b.
Janssen Pharmaceuticals. Remicade billing guide. 2016. https://www.janssencarepath.com/sites/www.janssencarepath.com/files/remicade-billing-guide.pdf.
Mack A. Norway, biosimilars in different funding systems. What works? GaBi. 2015;4(2):90–2.
Medicines for Europe. Payers’ P&MA policies supporting a sustainable biosimilar market. Final report. July 2016.
NICE. Introducing biosimilar versions of Infliximab: Inflectra and Remsima. 2015. http://www.biosimilars-nederland.nl/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/NICE-Adoption-Resource-Biosimilar-Infliximab-2015_07_31.pdf.
PwC Health Research Institute. Medical cost trend: behind the numbers. 2016. https://www.pwc.com/us/en/health-industries/behind-the-numbers/assets/pwc-hri-medical-cost-trend-chart-pack-2016.pdf.
Rémuzat C, Dorey J, Cristeau O, Ionescu D, Radière G, Toumi M. Key drivers for market penetration of biosimilars in Europe. J Mark Access Health Policy. 2017;5(1):1272308.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Additional information
Disclaimer: The views, opinions and statements made in this publication are solely those of the author and may not reflect the views of Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. or its affiliates.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Burich, M. (2018). The Changing US Reimbursement Landscape and Biosimilars. In: Gutka, H., Yang, H., Kakar, S. (eds) Biosimilars. AAPS Advances in the Pharmaceutical Sciences Series, vol 34. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99680-6_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99680-6_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-99679-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-99680-6
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)