Abstract
The measurement of biological activity is required for therapeutic antibodies at release of a new manufacturing batch and throughout the product life cycle. However, the applicable regulatory guidelines provide relatively little advice with respect to the number and types of bioassays to be employed. For example, 21CFR610.10 states that potency tests “shall consist of either in vitro or in vivo tests, or both, which have been specifically designed for each product so as to indicate its potency in a manner adequate to satisfy the interpretation of potency” where potency is “the specific ability of capacity of the product, as indicated by appropriate laboratory tests or by adequately controlled clinical data obtained through the administration of the product in the manner intended, to effect a given result.” ICH Q6B lists animal-based biological tests, cell culture-based biological tests, biochemical tests and ligand and receptor binding tests as examples of biological tests. However, neither guideline provides any assistance on how to select the most appropriate bioassay format(s) for a given product. Since biological activity is determined based on individual product characteristics and mechanism of action, there is considerable decision-making involved when selecting, developing, switching, and maintaining appropriate bioassays. This chapter discusses the types of biological assays, the current practices and regulatory expectations regarding the potency test format. A key question for antibody therapeutics that acts as agonists or antagonists of a ligand-receptor interaction, is the question of cell-based versus binding assays. Development and validation considerations for biological assays will also be discussed. This chapter will particularly focus on special considerations for biosimilar antibody therapeutics and provide a strategy for the biological testing methods, plan, and statistical assessment for the assessment of functional biosimilarity. Key differences in the application of a battery of in vitro biological activity assays between a biosimilar and a novel biologic, and case studies will be discussed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Christl L. Overview of regulatory pathway and FDA’s guidance for development and approval of biosimilar products in US. Presented at FDA ODAC meeting, 7 Jan 2015, Silver Spring, Maryland. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/AdvisoryCommittees/CommitteesMeetingMaterials/Drugs/OncologicDrugsAdvisoryCommittee/UCM436387.pdf.
European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines. Chapter 5.3. Statistical analysis. European pharmacopoeia. Strasbourg: European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines; 2004. p. 473–507.
Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Scientific considerations in demonstrating biosimilarity to a reference product, 2012.
Hu J, Wala I, Han H, Nagatani J, Barger T, Civoli F, Kaliyaperumal A, Zhuang Y, Gupta S. Comparison of cell-based and non-cell-based assay platforms for the detection of clinically relevant anti-drug neutralizing antibodies for immunogenicity assessment of therapeutic proteins. J Immunol Methods. 2015;419:1–8.
Jiang XR, Song A, Bergelson S, Arroll T, Parekh B, May K, Chung S, Strouse R, Mire-Sluis A, Schenerman M. Advances in the assessment and control of the effector functions of therapeutic antibodies. Nature Rev Drug Discov. 2011;10(2):101–11.
Korhonen R, Moilanen E. Abatacept. A novel CD80/86-CD28 T cell co-stimulation modulator, in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2009;104:276–84.
Mire-Sluis AR. Progress in the use of biological assays during the development of biotechnology products. Pharm Res. 2001;18(9):1239–46.
Mire-Sluis AR, Thorpe R. Quantitative cell line based bioassays for cytokines. J Immunol Methods. 1995;187:191–9.
Mire-Sluis AR, Gaines-Das R, Gerrard T, Padilla A, Thorpe R. Biological assays: their role in the development and quality control of biological medicinal products. Biologicals. 1996; 24:351–61.
Peppel K, Crawford D, Beutler B. A tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor-IgG heavy chain chimeric protein as a bivalent antagonist of TNF activity. J Exp Med. 1991;174:1483–9.
Sasardic D, Mire-Sluis AR. Biological standardization and control at the World Health Organization: successes, current issues and future challenges. Biologicals. 2000;28:47–53.
Schnueriger A, Grau R, Sondermann P, Schreitmueller T, Marti S, Zocher M. Development of a quantitative, cell-line based assay to measure ADCC activity mediated by therapeutic antibodies. Mol Immunol. 2011;48(12–13):1512–7.
Sievers EL, Senter PD. Antibody-drug conjugates in cancer therapy. Annu Rev Med. 2013;64: 15–29.
Thorpe R, Wadhwa M, Mire-Sluis AR. The use of bioassays for the characterisation and control of biological therapeutic products produced by biotechnology. Dev Biol Stand. 1997;91:79–88.
Tsong Y, Dong X, Shen M. Development of statistical methods for analytical similarity assessment. J Biopharm Stat. 2017;27(2):197–205.
USP. Chapter <1032>. United States Pharmacopeia (USP): the national formulary. Rockville: USP Pharmacopeia Convention, Inc.; 2012a.
USP. Chapter <1034>. United States Pharmacopeia (USP): the national formulary. Rockville: USP Pharmacopeia Convention, Inc.; 2012b.
Wu YL, Li J, Kim HJ, Liu X, Liu WY, Akhgar A, Bowen MA, Spitz S, Jiang XR, Roskos L, White W. A novel antibody dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC)-based reporter neutralizing antibody (NAb) assay in support of benralizumab clinical development. AAPS J. 2015;17(6):1417–26.
Yang H, Kim HJ, Zhang L, Schenerman M, Strouse R, Jiang XR. Implementation of parallelism testing for four-parameter logistic model in bioassays. PDA J Pharm Sci Tech. 2012;66:262–9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jiang, XR., Mire-Sluis, A. (2018). Biological Activity Assays for Antibody Therapeutics. In: Gutka, H., Yang, H., Kakar, S. (eds) Biosimilars. AAPS Advances in the Pharmaceutical Sciences Series, vol 34. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99680-6_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99680-6_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-99679-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-99680-6
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)