Skip to main content

Biological Activity Assays for Antibody Therapeutics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Biosimilars

Part of the book series: AAPS Advances in the Pharmaceutical Sciences Series ((AAPS,volume 34))

  • 2099 Accesses

Abstract

The measurement of biological activity is required for therapeutic antibodies at release of a new manufacturing batch and throughout the product life cycle. However, the applicable regulatory guidelines provide relatively little advice with respect to the number and types of bioassays to be employed. For example, 21CFR610.10 states that potency tests “shall consist of either in vitro or in vivo tests, or both, which have been specifically designed for each product so as to indicate its potency in a manner adequate to satisfy the interpretation of potency” where potency is “the specific ability of capacity of the product, as indicated by appropriate laboratory tests or by adequately controlled clinical data obtained through the administration of the product in the manner intended, to effect a given result.” ICH Q6B lists animal-based biological tests, cell culture-based biological tests, biochemical tests and ligand and receptor binding tests as examples of biological tests. However, neither guideline provides any assistance on how to select the most appropriate bioassay format(s) for a given product. Since biological activity is determined based on individual product characteristics and mechanism of action, there is considerable decision-making involved when selecting, developing, switching, and maintaining appropriate bioassays. This chapter discusses the types of biological assays, the current practices and regulatory expectations regarding the potency test format. A key question for antibody therapeutics that acts as agonists or antagonists of a ligand-receptor interaction, is the question of cell-based versus binding assays. Development and validation considerations for biological assays will also be discussed. This chapter will particularly focus on special considerations for biosimilar antibody therapeutics and provide a strategy for the biological testing methods, plan, and statistical assessment for the assessment of functional biosimilarity. Key differences in the application of a battery of in vitro biological activity assays between a biosimilar and a novel biologic, and case studies will be discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Christl L. Overview of regulatory pathway and FDA’s guidance for development and approval of biosimilar products in US. Presented at FDA ODAC meeting, 7 Jan 2015, Silver Spring, Maryland. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/AdvisoryCommittees/CommitteesMeetingMaterials/Drugs/OncologicDrugsAdvisoryCommittee/UCM436387.pdf.

  • European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines. Chapter 5.3. Statistical analysis. European pharmacopoeia. Strasbourg: European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines; 2004. p. 473–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Scientific considerations in demonstrating biosimilarity to a reference product, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu J, Wala I, Han H, Nagatani J, Barger T, Civoli F, Kaliyaperumal A, Zhuang Y, Gupta S. Comparison of cell-based and non-cell-based assay platforms for the detection of clinically relevant anti-drug neutralizing antibodies for immunogenicity assessment of therapeutic proteins. J Immunol Methods. 2015;419:1–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang XR, Song A, Bergelson S, Arroll T, Parekh B, May K, Chung S, Strouse R, Mire-Sluis A, Schenerman M. Advances in the assessment and control of the effector functions of therapeutic antibodies. Nature Rev Drug Discov. 2011;10(2):101–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Korhonen R, Moilanen E. Abatacept. A novel CD80/86-CD28 T cell co-stimulation modulator, in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2009;104:276–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mire-Sluis AR. Progress in the use of biological assays during the development of biotechnology products. Pharm Res. 2001;18(9):1239–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mire-Sluis AR, Thorpe R. Quantitative cell line based bioassays for cytokines. J Immunol Methods. 1995;187:191–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mire-Sluis AR, Gaines-Das R, Gerrard T, Padilla A, Thorpe R. Biological assays: their role in the development and quality control of biological medicinal products. Biologicals. 1996; 24:351–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peppel K, Crawford D, Beutler B. A tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor-IgG heavy chain chimeric protein as a bivalent antagonist of TNF activity. J Exp Med. 1991;174:1483–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sasardic D, Mire-Sluis AR. Biological standardization and control at the World Health Organization: successes, current issues and future challenges. Biologicals. 2000;28:47–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schnueriger A, Grau R, Sondermann P, Schreitmueller T, Marti S, Zocher M. Development of a quantitative, cell-line based assay to measure ADCC activity mediated by therapeutic antibodies. Mol Immunol. 2011;48(12–13):1512–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sievers EL, Senter PD. Antibody-drug conjugates in cancer therapy. Annu Rev Med. 2013;64: 15–29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thorpe R, Wadhwa M, Mire-Sluis AR. The use of bioassays for the characterisation and control of biological therapeutic products produced by biotechnology. Dev Biol Stand. 1997;91:79–88.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tsong Y, Dong X, Shen M. Development of statistical methods for analytical similarity assessment. J Biopharm Stat. 2017;27(2):197–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USP. Chapter <1032>. United States Pharmacopeia (USP): the national formulary. Rockville: USP Pharmacopeia Convention, Inc.; 2012a.

    Google Scholar 

  • USP. Chapter <1034>. United States Pharmacopeia (USP): the national formulary. Rockville: USP Pharmacopeia Convention, Inc.; 2012b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu YL, Li J, Kim HJ, Liu X, Liu WY, Akhgar A, Bowen MA, Spitz S, Jiang XR, Roskos L, White W. A novel antibody dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC)-based reporter neutralizing antibody (NAb) assay in support of benralizumab clinical development. AAPS J. 2015;17(6):1417–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang H, Kim HJ, Zhang L, Schenerman M, Strouse R, Jiang XR. Implementation of parallelism testing for four-parameter logistic model in bioassays. PDA J Pharm Sci Tech. 2012;66:262–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xu-Rong Jiang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jiang, XR., Mire-Sluis, A. (2018). Biological Activity Assays for Antibody Therapeutics. In: Gutka, H., Yang, H., Kakar, S. (eds) Biosimilars. AAPS Advances in the Pharmaceutical Sciences Series, vol 34. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99680-6_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics