Skip to main content

Income and Expenditure Mismatch of Poorest of the Poor: An Analysis of Financial Requirement of Slum Dwellers

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Current Issues in the Economy and Finance of India (ICEF 2018 2018)

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics ((SPBE))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 499 Accesses

Abstract

Economic and social positioning of individuals are the prime indicators which are directly related to incomes of the households. Income and consumption expenditure determines economic stability and social well-being of the households. Income is used as a display to measure economic deprivations of the households in India . So, both the income and consumption expenditure are used to measure the overall conditioning of the households. Here the question arises weather consumer behaviour is determined more by income or expenditure. Some policy makers and economists believe that poverty can’t be displayed by current income and it is not a stable measure to provide an exact description of individuals well-being (Meyer and Sullivan in The American Economic Review, 2221–2241, 2008). Consumption expenditure is not determined by consumers current income , but the measures of consumers “permanent” income are representative by his/her ability to earn income over a longer time period and also Expectations of future earnings and wealth (Friedman in A theory of the consumption function: A study by the National Bureau of Economic Research. Princeton University Press 1957). and the income which Friedman talks about is the annual incomes of consumers expect to earn over the years. It has been observed that income and expenditure didn’t remain similar among households. Income is concerned as a good indicator of well-being for various reasons which are Housing, Food, Child care, Health care and other necessities. In low income households there is a possibility of consumption without expenditure and earnings. Income and expenditure are the two key fundamentals by which people make the best efforts to live a good life. Everyone wants to have a handsome income to live in a comfortable way. This study examines the income and expenditure pattern of slums dwellers and their financial requirements among the key financial services (i.e. savings , credit, insurance, micro-leasing and pension schemes) of Lucknow city, Findings suggest that poor people can and do save, particularly when institutional barriers to saving are cut off. Institutional polices should target poor people on the bases of poverty so that poor can get an opportunity to promote their poverty into more sustainable and inclusive wealth endorsement policies that will assist them to create own pathways out of poverty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adler, N. E., & Newman, K. (2002). Socioeconomic disparities in health: pathways and policies. Health Affairs, 21(2), 60–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A. B. (1998). Poverty in Europe. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhalla, S. S. (1980). The measurement of permanent income and its application to savings behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 88(4), 722–744.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, J., & Rowlingson, K. (1996). Low-income households and credit: Exclusion, preference and inclusion. Environment and Planning A, 28, 1345–1360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1957). A theory of the consumption function: A study by the National Bureau of Economic Research. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katona, G. (1951). Psychological analysis of economic behaviour. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katona, G. (1975). Psychological economics. New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, B. D., & Sullivan, J. X. (2008). Changes in the consumption, income, and well-being of single mother headed families. The American Economic Review, 2221–2241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford, S. (2000). The poor and their money. New Delhi: Oxford university press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G. J. (1954). The early history of empirical studies of consumer behaviour. The Journal of Political Economy, 95–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2005). Microfinance and the millennium development goals: A reader’s guide to the millennium project reports and other UN documents. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. K. Yadav .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Malik, F.A., Yadav, D.K., Jain, R. (2018). Income and Expenditure Mismatch of Poorest of the Poor: An Analysis of Financial Requirement of Slum Dwellers. In: Mishra, A., Arunachalam, V., Patnaik, D. (eds) Current Issues in the Economy and Finance of India. ICEF 2018 2018. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99555-7_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics