Skip to main content

Numerical Modeling of Crack Propagation in Masonry Structures

  • Conference paper
Structural Analysis of Historical Constructions

Part of the book series: RILEM Bookseries ((RILEM,volume 18))

Abstract

Before implementing permanent monitoring systems or reinforcements on a historic structure with identified cracks, it is imperative to understand how cracking patterns may have originated and how they affect the current state of the structure. This work outlines a mixed numerical approach for understanding the causes of masonry cracking and the resulting effects on structural performance. By combining Finite Element Modeling and Distinct Element Modeling, the structural response of an undamaged version of a building can be calculated for a combination of loading scenarios (including dead load, lateral loads, and differential settlement). The results of the loading scenarios can be compared to the current state of the building for a probabilistic understanding of potential causes. This combined approach was used to examine the large cracks running longitudinally on the subterranean walls of the Florence Baptistery. Various combinations of loading scenarios were run for an undamaged model of the wall. Additionally, various geometries of the joints were simulated to understand how the accuracy of input geometries can affect simulation results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 509.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 649.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Arletti R, Conte S, Vandini M, Fiori C, Bracci S, Bacci M, Porcinai S (2011) Florence baptistery: chemical and mineralogical investigation of glassmosaic tesserae. J Archaeol Sci 38:79–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hess M, Petrovic V, Yeager M, Kuester F (2017) Terrestrial laser scanning for the comprehensive structural health assessment of the Baptistery di San Giovanni in Florence, Italy: an integrative methodology for repeatable data acquisition, visualization and analysis. Struct Infrastruct Eng 2479(August):1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2017.1349810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fratini M, Pieraccini M, Atzeni C, Betti M, Bartoli G (2011) Assessment of vibration reduction on the Baptistery of San Giovanni in Florence (Italy) after vehicular traffic block. J Cult Herit 12:323–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Giusti AM (2000) The Baptistery of San Giovanni in Florence. La Mandragora s.r.l

    Google Scholar 

  5. Toker F (2017) A Baptistery below the Baptistery of Florence. Art Bull 58(2):157–167 http://www.jstor.org/stable/3049493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lacanna G, Ripepe M, Marchetti E, Coli M, Garzonio CA (2016) Dynamic response of the Baptistery of San Giovanni in Florence, Italy, based on ambient vibration test. J Cult Herit 20(March):632–640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2016.02.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bernabei M, Bontadi J, Quarta G, Calcagnile L, Diodato M (2016) The Baptistry of Saint John in Florence: the scientific dating of the timber structure of the dome. Int J Architect Herit 10(6):704–713. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2015.1109734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lourenço PB, Rots JG (1997) Multisurface interface model for analysis of masonry structures. J Eng Mech 123(7):660–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lourenço PB (2002) Computations on historic masonry structures. Prog Struct Eng Mater 4:301–319. https://doi.org/10.1002/pse.120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Milani G, Lourenço PB, Tralli A (2006) Homogenised limit analysis of masonry walls, Part I: failure surfaces. Comput & Struct 84(3):166–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Azevedo NM, Lemos JV (2005) A generalized rigid particle contact model for fracture analysis. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 29(3):269–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Azevedo NM, Lemos JV (2006) Hybrid discrete element/finite element method for fracture analysis. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 195(33):4579–4593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Munjiza A, Owen DRJ, Bicanic N (1995) A combined finite-discrete element method in transient dynamics of fracturing solids. Eng Comput 12(2):145–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Itasca Consulting Group, Inc. (2016) 3DEC — Three-Dimensional Distinct Element Code, Ver. 5.2. Theory and Background. Itasca, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sarhosis V, Bagi K, Lemos JV, Milani, G (eds) (2016) Computational modeling of masonry structures using the discrete element method. IGI Global

    Google Scholar 

  16. Asteris P, Plevris V (2015) Handbook of Research on Seismic Assessment and Rehabilitation of Historic Structures. Advances in Civil and Industrial Engineering (ISSN: 2326- 6139)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kavanaugh C, Morris IM, Napolitano R, Jorquera-Lucerga JJ (2017) Validating the use of graphical thrust line analysis for pier buttresses: the case study of amiens cathedral. Int J Architect Herit 11(6):859–870. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2017.1317883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Smoljanović H, Živaljić N, Nikolić Ž (2013) A combined finite-discrete element analysis of dry stone masonry structures. Eng Struct 52(July):89–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.02.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Reccia E, Cecchi A, Milani G (2016) FEM/DEM approach for analysis of masonry arch bridges. In: Sarhosis V, Bagi K, Lemos JV, Milani G (eds.) Computational modeling of masonry structures using the discrete element method. IGI Global

    Google Scholar 

  20. Baraldi D, Reccia E, Cazzani A, Cecchi A (2013) Comparative analysis of numerical discrete and finite element models: the case of in-plane loaded periodic brickwork. Compos Mech Comput Appl: Int J 4(4):319–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Owen DRJ, Peric D, Petrinic N, Brookes CL, James PJ (1998) Finite/discrete element models for assessment and repair of masonry structures. In: Proceedings of the second international arch bridge conference on arch bridges–history, analysis, assessment, maintenance and repair. AA Balkema, pp 173–180

    Google Scholar 

  22. Barsanti SG, Guidi G, De Luca L (2017) Segmentation of 3D models for cultural heritage structural analysis-some critical issues. ISPRS Ann Photogramm Remote Sens Spatial Inf Sci 4:115–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Autodesk Inventor. “Granite: cut, rough”. https://www.autodesk.com/products/inventor/overview

  24. Walker R (2016) Density of Materials. https://www.simetric.co.uk/si_materials.htm

  25. Psycharis IN, Lemos JV, Papastamatiou DY, Zambas C, Papantonopoulos C (2003) Numerical study of the seismic behaviour of a part of the Parthenon Pronaos. Earthquake Eng Struct Dynam 32(13):2063–2084. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Drdácký M, Fratini F, Frankeová D, Slížková Z (2013) The Roman mortars used in the construction of the Ponte di Augusto (Narni, Italy)–A comprehensive assessment. Constr Build Mater 38:1117–1128

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was completed as part of the Itasca Educational Partnership under the mentorship of Dr. Jim Hazzard without whose guidance, this paper would not have been possible. This works was supported by the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, the Council on Science and Technology, the Dean’s Fund for Innovation, and the School of Engineering and Applied Sciences at Princeton. Additional support was provided by the Kinsella Fund, the Qualcomm Institute at UC San Diego, the Friends of CISA3, and the World Cultural Heritage Society. This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program under Grants No. DGE-1656466 and #DGE-0966375, ‘Training, Research and Education in Engineering for Cultural Heritage Diagnostics,’ and award #CNS-1338192, ‘MRI: Development of Advanced Visualization Instrumentation for the Collaborative Exploration of Big Data.’. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. The authors would like to thank Maurizio Seracini, the Opera di Santa Maria del Fiore and President Franco Lucchesi for the opportunity to study the Baptistery di San Giovanni. Opinions, findings, and conclusions from this study are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the research sponsors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rebecca Napolitano .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 RILEM

About this paper

Cite this paper

Napolitano, R., Hess, M., Coe-Scharff, R., Glisic, B. (2019). Numerical Modeling of Crack Propagation in Masonry Structures. In: Aguilar, R., Torrealva, D., Moreira, S., Pando, M.A., Ramos, L.F. (eds) Structural Analysis of Historical Constructions. RILEM Bookseries, vol 18. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99441-3_89

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99441-3_89

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-99440-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-99441-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics