Skip to main content

Toward Human-Like Sentence Interpretation—a Syntactic Parser Implemented as a Restricted Quasi Bayesian Network—

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures 2018 (BICA 2018)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 848))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 526 Accesses

Abstract

Most sentences expressed in a natural language is ambiguous. However, human beings effortlessly understand the intended message of the sentence even when a computer program finds out countless possible interpretations. If we want to create a computer program that understands a natural language in the same way as human beings do, a promising way would be implementing a human-like mechanism of sentence processing instead of implementing a “list exhaustively then select” method. By the way, it is highly likely that human’s language ability is realized mostly by the cerebral cortex, and recent neuroscientific studies hypothesize that the cerebral cortex works as a Bayesian network. Then it should be possible to reproduce human’s language ability using a Bayesian network. Based on this idea, we implemented a syntactic parser using a restricted quasi Bayesian network, which is a prototyping tool for creating models of cerebral cortical areas. The parser analyzes a sequence of syntactic categories based on a subset of combinatory categorial grammar. We confirmed that the parser correctly parsed grammatical sequences and rejected ungrammatical sequences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Chikkerur, S., Serre, T., Tan, C., Poggio, T.: What and where: a Bayesian inference theory of attention. Vis. Res. 50(22), 2233–2247 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dura-Bernal, S., Wennekers, T., Denham, S.L.: Top-down feedback in an HMAX-like cortical model of object perception based on hierarchical Bayesian networks and belief propagation. PLoS One 7(11), e48216 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. George, D., Hawkins, J.: A hierarchical Bayesian model of invariant pattern recognition in the visual cortex. In: 2005 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hosoya, H.: Multinominal Bayesian learning for modeling classical and nonclassical receptive field properties. Neural Comput. 24(8), 2119–2150 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Ichisugi, Y.: The cerebral cortex model that self-organizes conditional probability tables and executes belief propagation. In: 2007 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ichisugi, Y.: Recognition model of cerebral cortex based on approximate belief revision algorithm. In: 2011 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kemmerer, D.: Cognitive Neuroscience of Language. Psychology Press, Abingdon (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lee, T.S., Mumford, D.: Hierarchical Bayesian inference in the visual cortex. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 20(7), 1434–1448 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Litvak, S., Ullman, S.: Cortical circuitry implementing graphical models. Neural Comput. 21(11), 3010–3056 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Pearl, J.: Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco (1988)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Pitkow, X., Angelaki, D.E.: Inference in the brain: statistics flowing in redundant population codes. Neuron 94(5), 943–953 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Raju, R.V., Pitkow, X.: Inference by reparameterization in neural population codes. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 29: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2016, 5–10 December 2016, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 2029–2037 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rao, R.P.: Bayesian inference and attention modulation in the visual cortex. Neuroreport 16(16), 1843–1848 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Röhrbein, F., Eggert, J., Körner, E.: Bayesian columnar networks for grounded cognitive system. In: Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 1423–1428 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Steedman, M.: The Syntactic Process. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Takahashi, N., Ichisugi, Y.: Restricted quasi Bayesian networks as a prototyping tool for computational models of individual cortical areas. In: Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, PMLR, vol. 73 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This paper is based on results obtained from a project commissioned by the New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naoto Takahashi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Takahashi, N., Ichisugi, Y. (2019). Toward Human-Like Sentence Interpretation—a Syntactic Parser Implemented as a Restricted Quasi Bayesian Network—. In: Samsonovich, A. (eds) Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures 2018. BICA 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 848. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99316-4_40

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics