Abstract
The proliferation of social media has made it easier than ever for customers to compare the prices they have paid for products and services, in addition to how they come across “deals.” Price fairness judgments have been shown to be influenced by consumers’ comparisons to other consumers, or referents, regarding the prices paid by each for the same or similar products, with the prevailing sentiment being that it is unfair for one customer to receive a better price than another customer for the same product purchased from the same retailer. The current work examines how referent effort and referent loyalty influence referent deservingness perceptions and serve to justify price inequality in such a scenario. In three experiments, we demonstrate a consistent process through which customer purchase efforts serve to influence evaluations of a customer’s deservingness to receive a lower price, ultimately explaining evaluations of price fairness in consumption scenarios where one customer pays a lower price than another customer for the same product. The theoretical and managerial implications of these findings are discussed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Haws and Bearden (2006) used a DVD player in their scenario. We adapted the scenario to feature the purchase of a small television given that the sales of DVD technology have significantly fallen off in recent years.
References
Agrawal, V., & Ferguson, M. (2007). Optimal customized pricing in competitive settings. Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, 6, 212–228.
Ashworth, L., & McShane, L. (2012). Why do we care what others pay? The effect of other consumers’ prices on inferences of seller (dis) respect and perceptions of deservingness violation. Journal of Retailing, 88(1), 145–155.
Bolton, L. E., Keh, H. T., & Alba, J. W. (2010). How do price fairness perceptions differ across culture? Journal of Marketing Research, 47(3), 564–576.
Bolton, L. E., Warlop, L., & Alba, J. W. (2003). Consumer perceptions of price (un) fairness. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(4), 474–491.
Darke, P. R., & Dahl, D. W. (2003). Fairness and discounts: The subjective value of a bargain. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(3), 328–338.
Fardouly, J., Diedrichs, P. C., Vartanian, L. R., & Halliwell, E. (2015). Social comparisons on social media: The impact of Facebook on young women’s body image concerns and mood. Body Image, 13, 38–45.
Ferguson, J. L. (2014). Implementing price increases in turbulent economies: Pricing approaches for reducing perceptions of price unfairness. Journal of Business Research, 67(1), 2732–2737.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 382–388.
Haws, K. L., & Bearden, W. O. (2006). Dynamic pricing and consumer fairness perceptions. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(3), 304–311.
Morales, A. C. (2005). Giving firms an “E” for effort: Consumer responses to high-effort firms. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(4), 806–812.
Mowen, J. C., & Grove, S. J. (1983). Search behavior, price paid, and the comparison other: an equity theory analysis of post purchase satisfaction. International fare in consumer satisfaction and complaining behavior, 57–63.
Niedrich, R. W., Weathers, D., Hill, R. C., & Bell, D. R. (2009). Specifying price judgments with range–frequency theory in models of brand choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 46(5), 693–702.
Oliver, R. L., & Swan, J. E. (1989). Equity and disconfirmation perceptions as influences on merchant and product satisfaction. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(3), 372–383.
Perdue, B. C., & Summers, J. O. (1986). Checking the success of manipulations in marketing experiments. Journal of Marketing Research, 23, 317–326.
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891.
Reczek, R. W., Haws, K. L., & Summers, C. A. (2014). Lucky loyalty: the effect of consumer effort on predictions of randomly determined marketing outcomes. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(4), 1065–1077.
Turow, J., Feldman, L., & Meltzer, K. (2005). Open to exploitation: America’s shoppers online and offline. A report from the annenberg public policy center of the University of Pennsylvania, Retrieved from http://repository.upenn.edu/asc_papers/35
Xia, L., Kukar-Kinney, M., & Monroe, K. B. (2010). Effects of consumers’ efforts on price and promotion fairness perceptions. Journal of Retailing, 86(1), 1–10.
Xia, L., Monroe, K. B., & Cox, J. L. (2004). The price is unfair! A conceptual framework of price fairness perceptions. Journal of Marketing, 68(4), 1–15.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Academy of Marketing Science
About this paper
Cite this paper
Lastner, M.M., Fennell, P., Folse, J.A.G., Rice, D.H., Porter, M. (2018). You Deserved That: The Roles of Purchase Effort and Loyalty in Explaining Price Inequality Outcomes. In: Krey, N., Rossi, P. (eds) Boundary Blurred: A Seamless Customer Experience in Virtual and Real Spaces. AMSAC 2018. Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99181-8_152
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99181-8_152
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-99180-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-99181-8
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)