Skip to main content

You Deserved That: The Roles of Purchase Effort and Loyalty in Explaining Price Inequality Outcomes

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Boundary Blurred: A Seamless Customer Experience in Virtual and Real Spaces (AMSAC 2018)

Abstract

The proliferation of social media has made it easier than ever for customers to compare the prices they have paid for products and services, in addition to how they come across “deals.” Price fairness judgments have been shown to be influenced by consumers’ comparisons to other consumers, or referents, regarding the prices paid by each for the same or similar products, with the prevailing sentiment being that it is unfair for one customer to receive a better price than another customer for the same product purchased from the same retailer. The current work examines how referent effort and referent loyalty influence referent deservingness perceptions and serve to justify price inequality in such a scenario. In three experiments, we demonstrate a consistent process through which customer purchase efforts serve to influence evaluations of a customer’s deservingness to receive a lower price, ultimately explaining evaluations of price fairness in consumption scenarios where one customer pays a lower price than another customer for the same product. The theoretical and managerial implications of these findings are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Haws and Bearden (2006) used a DVD player in their scenario. We adapted the scenario to feature the purchase of a small television given that the sales of DVD technology have significantly fallen off in recent years.

References

  • Agrawal, V., & Ferguson, M. (2007). Optimal customized pricing in competitive settings. Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, 6, 212–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashworth, L., & McShane, L. (2012). Why do we care what others pay? The effect of other consumers’ prices on inferences of seller (dis) respect and perceptions of deservingness violation. Journal of Retailing, 88(1), 145–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, L. E., Keh, H. T., & Alba, J. W. (2010). How do price fairness perceptions differ across culture? Journal of Marketing Research, 47(3), 564–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, L. E., Warlop, L., & Alba, J. W. (2003). Consumer perceptions of price (un) fairness. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(4), 474–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darke, P. R., & Dahl, D. W. (2003). Fairness and discounts: The subjective value of a bargain. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(3), 328–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fardouly, J., Diedrichs, P. C., Vartanian, L. R., & Halliwell, E. (2015). Social comparisons on social media: The impact of Facebook on young women’s body image concerns and mood. Body Image, 13, 38–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, J. L. (2014). Implementing price increases in turbulent economies: Pricing approaches for reducing perceptions of price unfairness. Journal of Business Research, 67(1), 2732–2737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 382–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haws, K. L., & Bearden, W. O. (2006). Dynamic pricing and consumer fairness perceptions. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(3), 304–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morales, A. C. (2005). Giving firms an “E” for effort: Consumer responses to high-effort firms. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(4), 806–812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mowen, J. C., & Grove, S. J. (1983). Search behavior, price paid, and the comparison other: an equity theory analysis of post purchase satisfaction. International fare in consumer satisfaction and complaining behavior, 57–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niedrich, R. W., Weathers, D., Hill, R. C., & Bell, D. R. (2009). Specifying price judgments with range–frequency theory in models of brand choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 46(5), 693–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, R. L., & Swan, J. E. (1989). Equity and disconfirmation perceptions as influences on merchant and product satisfaction. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(3), 372–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perdue, B. C., & Summers, J. O. (1986). Checking the success of manipulations in marketing experiments. Journal of Marketing Research, 23, 317–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reczek, R. W., Haws, K. L., & Summers, C. A. (2014). Lucky loyalty: the effect of consumer effort on predictions of randomly determined marketing outcomes. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(4), 1065–1077.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turow, J., Feldman, L., & Meltzer, K. (2005). Open to exploitation: America’s shoppers online and offline. A report from the annenberg public policy center of the University of Pennsylvania, Retrieved from http://repository.upenn.edu/asc_papers/35

  • Xia, L., Kukar-Kinney, M., & Monroe, K. B. (2010). Effects of consumers’ efforts on price and promotion fairness perceptions. Journal of Retailing, 86(1), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xia, L., Monroe, K. B., & Cox, J. L. (2004). The price is unfair! A conceptual framework of price fairness perceptions. Journal of Marketing, 68(4), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew M. Lastner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Academy of Marketing Science

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Lastner, M.M., Fennell, P., Folse, J.A.G., Rice, D.H., Porter, M. (2018). You Deserved That: The Roles of Purchase Effort and Loyalty in Explaining Price Inequality Outcomes. In: Krey, N., Rossi, P. (eds) Boundary Blurred: A Seamless Customer Experience in Virtual and Real Spaces. AMSAC 2018. Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99181-8_152

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics