Abstract
Immersion in a creative task can be an intimate experience. It can feel like a mystery: intangible, inexplicable, and beyond the reach of science. However, science is making exciting headway into understanding creativity. While the mind of a highly uncreative individual consists of a collection of items accumulated through direct experience and enculturation, the mind of a creative individual is self-organizing and self-mending; thus, experiences and items of cultural knowledge are thought through from different perspectives such that they cohere together into a loosely integrated whole. The reweaving of items in memory is elicited by perturbations: experiences that increase psychological entropy because they are inconsistent with one’s web of understandings. The process of responding to one perturbation often leads to other perturbations, i.e., other inconsistencies in one’s web of understandings. Creative thinking often requires the capacity to shift between divergent and convergent modes of thought in response to the ever-changing demands of the creative task. Since uncreative individuals can reap the benefits of creativity by imitating creators, using their inventions, or purchasing their artworks, it is not necessary that everyone be creative. Agent based computer models of cultural evolution suggest that society functions best with a mixture of creative and uncreative individuals. The ideal ratio of creativity to imitation increases in times of change, such as we are experiencing now. Therefore it is important to educate the next generation in ways that foster creativity. The chapter concludes with suggestions for how educational systems can cultivate creativity.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Andreasen, N. C. (1987). Creativity and mental illness: Prevalence rates in writers and their first-degree relatives. American Journal of Psychiatry, 144, 1288–1292.
Bak, P., Tang, C., & Weisenfeld, K. (1988). Self-organized criticality. Physical Review A, 38, 364.
Beghetto, R. A. (2007). Ideational code-switching: Walking the talk about supporting student creativity in the classroom. Roeper Review, 29, 265–270.
Beghetto, R. A. (2013). Killing ideas softly?: The promise and perils of creativity in the classroom. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
Chrusch, C., & Gabora, L. (2014). A tentative role for FOXP2 in the evolution of dual processing modes and generative abilities. In P. Bello, M. Guarini, M. McShane, & B. Scassellati (Eds.), Proceedings of 36th annual meeting of cognitive science society (pp. 499–504). Austin: Cognitive Science Society.
Donald, M. (1991). Origins of the modern mind: Three stages in the evolution of culture and cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Edelman, G. (1987). Neural Darwinism: The theory of neuronal group selection. New York: Basic Books.
Eldridge, N., & Gould, S. J. (1972). Punctuated equilibria: An alternative to phyletic gradualism. In T. Schopf (Ed.), Models in paleobiology (pp. 82–115). New York: Freeman, Cooper &.
Ellamil, M., Dobson, C., Beeman, M., & Christoff, K. (2012). Evaluative and generative modes of thought during the creative process. NeuroImage, 59, 1783–1794.
Feinstein, J. S. (2006). The nature of creative development. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(4), 290–309.
Gabora, L. (1995). Meme and Variations: A computer model of cultural evolution. In L. Nadel & D. L. Stein (Eds.), 1993 lectures in complex systems (pp. 471–486). Boston: Addison Wesley.
Gabora, L. (1997). The origin and evolution of culture and creativity. Journal of Memetics: Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission, 1(1). http://cfpm.org/jom-emit/1997/vol1/gabora_l.html
Gabora, L. (1998). Weaving, bending, patching, mending the fabric of reality: A cognitive science perspective on worldview inconsistency. Foundations of Science, 3(2), 395–428.
Gabora, L. (2003). Contextual focus: A cognitive explanation for the cultural transition of the middle/upper paleolithic. In R. Alterman & D. Hirsch (Eds.), Proceedings of 25th annual meeting of cognitive science society (pp. 432–437). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Gabora, L. (2004). Ideas are not replicators but minds are. Biology and Philosophy, 19(1), 127–143.
Gabora, L. (2006). Self-other organization: Why early life did not evolve through natural selection. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 241, 443–450.
Gabora, L. (2010). Revenge of the ‘neurds’: Characterizing creative thought in terms of the structure and dynamics of human memory. Creativity Research Journal, 22, 1–13.
Gabora, L. (2011). Five clarifications about cultural evolution. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 11, 61–83.
Gabora, L. (2013). An evolutionary framework for culture: Selectionism versus communal exchange. Physics of Life Reviews, 10(2), 117–145.
Gabora, L. (2017a). Honing theory: A complex systems framework for creativity. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 21(1), 35–88.
Gabora, L. (2017b, August 30). What creativity really is – and why schools need it. The Conversation. Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/what-creativity-really-is-and-why-schools-need-it-81889
Gabora, L. (2018). The neural basis and evolution of divergent and convergent thought. In O. Vartanian & R. Jung (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of the neuroscience of creativity. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Gabora, L., & Merrifield, M. (2012). Dynamical disequilibrium, transformation, and the evolution and development of sustainable worldviews. In F. Orsucci & N. Sala (Eds.), Complexity science, living systems, and reflexing interfaces (pp. 69–77). Hershey: IGI Global.
Gabora, L., & Ranjan, A. (2013). How insight emerges in distributed, content-addressable memory. In A. Bristol, O. Vartanian, & J. Kaufman (Eds.), The neuroscience of creativity (pp. 19–43). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gabora, L., & Smith, C. (in press). Two cognitive transitions underlying the capacity for cultural evolution. Journal of Anthropological Sciences.
Gabora, L., & Tseng, S. (2017). The social benefits of balancing creativity and imitation: Evidence from an agent-based model. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 11(4), 457–473.
Gabora, L., Chia, W. W., & Firouzi, H. (2013). A computational model of two cognitive transitions underlying cultural evolution. In M. Knauff, M. Pauen, N. Sebanz, & I. Wachsmuth (Eds.), Proceedings of 35th annual meeting of cognitive science society (pp. 2344–2349). Austin: Cognitive Science Society.
Gick, M. L., & Lockhart, R. S. (1995). Creative insight and preventive forms. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of insight. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Greenwald, A., Banaji, M., Rudman, L. A., Farnham, S., Nosek, B., & Mellott, D. (2002). A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept. Psychological Review, 109, 3–25.
Gregerson, M., Kaufman, J., & Snyder, H. (Eds.). (2013). Teaching creatively and teaching creativity. New York: Springer.
Guastello, S. J. (2002). Managing emergent phenomena: Nonlinear dynamics in work organizations. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hebb, D. (1949). The organization of behavior. New York: Wiley.
Hirsh, J., Mar, R., & Peterson, J. (2012). Psychological entropy: A framework for understanding uncertainty-related anxiety. Psychological Review, 119, 304–320.
Hordijk, W., Hein, J., & Steel, M. (2010). Autocatalytic sets and the origin of life. Entropy, 12, 1733–1742.
Jacobsen, J. J., & Guastello, S. J. (2011). Diffusion models for innovation: S-curves, networks, power laws, catastrophes, and entropy. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 15, 307–333.
Josselyn, S., et al. (2015). Finding the engram. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 16(9), 521–534.
Kanerva, P. (1988). Sparse distributed memory. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Kauffman, S. (1993). Origins of order. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kitzbichler, M. G., Smith, M. L., Christensen, S. R., & Bullmore, E. (2009). Broadband criticality of human brain network synchronization. PLoS Computational Biology, 5, e1000314.
Kounios, J., & Beeman, M. (2009). The “Aha!” moment: The cognitive neuroscience of insight. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 210–216.
Kounios, J., & Beeman, M. (2014). The cognitive neuroscience of insight. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 71–93.
Mayer, R. E. (1995). The search for insight: Grappling with gestalt psychology’s unanswered questions. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of insight. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
McClelland, J. L. (2011). Memory as a constructive process: The parallel distributed processing approach. In S. Nalbantian, P. M. Matthews, J. L. McClelland, S. Nalbantian, P. M. Matthews, & J. L. McClelland (Eds.), The memory process: Neuroscientific and humanistic perspectives (pp. 129–155). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
McClelland, J. L., Rumelhart, D. E., & Hinton, G. E. (2003). Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. In M. P. Munger (Ed.), The history of psychology: Fundamental questions (pp. 478–492). New York: Oxford University Press.
Mithen, S. (1998). Creativity in human evolution and prehistory. London: Routledge.
Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., & Schreiber, T. A. (2004). The University of South Florida word association, rhyme and word fragment norms. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 408–420.
Orsucci, F. (2008). Reflexing interfaces: The complex coevolution of information technology ecosystems. Hershey: Idea Books.
Osgood, C. E., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1955). The principle of congruity in the prediction of attitude change. Psychological Review, 62, 42–55.
Paterson, H. M., Kemp, R. I., & Forgas, J. P. (2009). Co-witnesses, confederates, and conformity: The effects of discussion and delay on eyewitness memory. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 16(1), S112–S124.
Pelaprat, E., & Cole, M. (2011). “Minding the gap”: Imagination, creativity and human cognition. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 45(4), 397–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-011-9176-5.
Piaget, J. (2013). The construction of reality in the child (Vol. 82). London: Routledge.
Ranjan, A., & Gabora, L. (2012). Creative ideas for actualizing student potential. In H. Snyder, M. Gregerson, & J. Kaufman (Eds.), Teaching creatively (pp. 119–132). Berlin: Springer.
Salvi, C., Bricolo, E., Kounios, J., Bowden, E., & Beeman, M. (2016). Insight solutions are correct more often than analytic solutions. Thinking & Reasoning, 22, 443–460. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2016.1141798.
Schacter, D. L. (2001). The seven sins of memory: How the mind forgets and remembers. Reading: Houghton Mifflin.
Stephen, D. G., Boncoddo, R. A., Magnuson, J. S., & Dixon, J. (2009). The dynamics of insight: Mathematical discovery as a phase transition. Memory & Cognition, 37, 1132–1149.
Steyvers, M., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2005). The large-scale structure of semantic networks: Statistical analyses and a model of semantic growth. Cognitive Science, 29, 41–78.
Sutton, R. S. (1996). Generalization in reinforcement learning: Successful examples using sparse coarse coding. In Advances in neural information processing systems (pp. 1038–1044). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Topolinski, S., & Reber, R. (2010). Gaining insight into the “Aha” experience. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 402–402.
Vetsigian, K., Woese, C., & Goldenfeld, N. (2006). Collective evolution and the genetic code. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 103, 10696–10701.
Ward, T., Smith, S., & Vaid, J. (1997). Conceptual structures and processes in creative thought. In T. Ward, S. Smith, & J. Vaid (Eds.), Creative thought: An investigation of conceptual structures and processes (pp. 1–27). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Wilkenfeld, M. J., & Ward, T. B. (2001). Similarity and emergence in conceptual combination. Journal of Memory and Cognition, 45, 21–38.
Yoruk, S., & Runco, M. A. (2014). The neuroscience of divergent thinking. Activitas Nervosa Superior, 56, 1–16.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by a grant (62R06523) from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Maland, A., Gabora, L. (2019). Educational Implications of the ‘Self-Made Worldview’ Concept. In: Beghetto, R.A., Corazza, G.E. (eds) Dynamic Perspectives on Creativity. Creativity Theory and Action in Education, vol 4. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99163-4_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99163-4_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-99162-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-99163-4
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)