Skip to main content

Pathogens in Raspberry and Other Rubus spp.

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Raspberry

Abstract

Raspberry plants are susceptible to infection by a wide range of pathogens, however, whether any of these will cause significant disease in a plant at a specific location depends on many factors. Firstly, infection depends on the plant being exposed to the pathogen so that using only pathogen-tested plants to establish raspberry plantations will significantly reduce disease incidence. Some raspberry varieties carry natural resistance (or reduced susceptibility) to particular pathogens or their vectors. For example, resistance to aphid colonisation has been bred into many modern varieties. This reduces both damage due to aphid feeding and also reduces the transmission of certain viruses to the plants by the aphids. It should be noted that populations of aphids that overcome this resistance have emerged, and that the identification and deployment of sources of natural resistance needs to be an ongoing process. The application of chemical treatments to combat insects or fungi is common, though these treatments often have limited efficacy, may be overcome by development of resistance in the target organism, and are subject to environmental and consumer pressure to reduce their usage. Additionally, the introduction of new agronomic practices for the cultivation of raspberry plants can result in both an increase and a decline of infection by different pathogens. Raspberries are now widely grown under cover, in plastic tunnels, which increase the ambient temperature of the crop and extend the growing season. This can increase the multiplication rate and population size of insects in the crop, potentially increasing the prevalence of insect-transmitted viruses. Also, some raspberry crops are now planted in artificial substrate rather than into field soil. This helps to prevent their exposure to soil-borne diseases such as root rot or some viruses that are vectored by soil-borne nematodes. There is a movement towards reducing the period over which individual plants are maintained in commercial production. This reduces the time over which plants are exposed to pathogens, preventing the development of disease in the crop and also reducing the potential for the crop to become a reservoir of disease that can be spread to other plants. Lastly, changes to the environment, such as increased temperature or rainfall, and introduction of plants from other geographies or as new varieties, can lead to the emergence of new (or at least previously unrecognised) diseases. An example of this is the recent rise to prominence of raspberry leaf blotch disease caused by a complex of raspberry leaf and bud mite and raspberry leaf blotch virus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ballington JR (2016) The history of blackberry and raspberry breeding in the southern USA. Acta Hortic 1133:13–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barritt BH, Crandall PC, Bristow PR (1979) Breeding for root rot resistance in red raspberry. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 104:92–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Barritt BH, Crandall PC, Bristow PR (1981) Breeding for root rot resistance in red raspberry. Fruit Var J 35:60–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Bost S, Hale F (2006) Raspberry: Septoria leaf spot. http://eppserver.ag.utk.edu/Extension/fpn/fpn062006.htm. Accessed 20 Nov 2007. University of Tennessee, Nashville, TN

  • Bristow PR (1980) Raspberry root rot in the Pacific Northwest. Acta Hortic 112:233–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Daubeny HA (1996) Brambles. In: Janick J, Moore JN (eds) Fruit Breeding: Vol. II vine and small fruit crops. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, pp 109–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan JM, Cooke DEL (2002) Work on raspberry root rot at the Scottish Crop Research Institute. Acta Hortic 585:271–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis MA, Converse RH, Williams RN, Williamson B (1991) Compendium of raspberry and blackberry diseases and insects. APS Press, St Paul

    Google Scholar 

  • Finn CE, Swartz HJ, Moore PP, Ballington JR, Kempler C (2002) Use of 58 Rubus species in five North American breeding programs – breeders notes. Acta Hortic 585:113–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiola JA, Swartz HJ (1994) Inheritance of tolerance to Verticillium albo-atrum in raspberry. Hortscience 29:1071–1073

    Google Scholar 

  • Garthwaite D, Barker I, Ridley L, Mace A, Parrish G, MacArthur R, Lu Y (2016) Pesticide usage survey Report 274. Soft fruit in the United Kingdon 2016. Land Use & Sustainability, FERA. https://secure.fera.defra.gov.uk/pusstats/surveys/index.cfm

  • Gordon SC, Barrie IA, Woodford JA (1989) Predicting spring oviposition by raspberry cane midge from accumulated derived soil temperatures. Ann Appl Biol 114:419–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon SC, Williamson B, Graham J (2006) Current and future control strategies for major arthropod pests and fungal diseases of red raspberry (Rubus idaeus) in Europe. In: Dris R (ed) CROPS: quality, growth and biotechnology. WFL Publisher, Helsinki, pp 925–950

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham J, Hackett CA, Smith K, Woodhead M, MacKenzie K, Tierney I, Cooke DEL, Bayer M, Jennings N (2011) Towards an understanding of the nature of resistance to Phytophthora root rot in red raspberry: is it mainly root vigour? Theoretical and Applied Genetics 123:585–601.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Graham J, Smith K, Tierney I, MacKenzie K, Hackett CA (2006) Mapping gene H controlling cane pubescence in raspberry and its association with resistance to cane botrytis and spur blight, rust and cane spot. Theor Appl Genet 112:818–831

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hall HK, Hummer K, Jamieson AJ, Jennings SN, Weber CA (2009) Raspberry breeding and genetics. Plant Breed Rev 32:1–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancock JF (2008) Temperate fruit crop breeding: germplasm to genomics. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heiberg N (1995) Resistance to raspberry root rot (Phytophthora fragariae var. rubi) in red raspberry cultivars. Norwegian J Agr Sci 8:41–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiberg N (1999) Effects of raised beds, black soil mulch and oxadixyl on root rot (Phytophthora fragariae var. rubi) in red raspberry. Acta Hortic 505:249–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennings DL (1982) Resistance to Didymella applanata in red raspberry and some related species. Ann Appl Biol 101:331–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennings DL (1988) Raspberries and blackberries: their breeding, diseases and growth. Academic, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings DL, McGregor GR (1988) Resistance to cane spot (Elsinoe veneta) in the red raspberry and its relationship to yellow rust (Phragmidium rubi-idaei). Euphytica 37:173–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennings SN, Graham J, Ferguson L, Young V (2016) New developments in raspberry breeding in Scotland. Acta Hortic 1133:23–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keep E (1989) Breeding red raspberry for resistance to diseases and pests. Plant Breed Rev 6:245–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempler C, Daubeny HA, Harding B, Kowalenko CG (2005) ‘Cowichan’ red raspberry. Hortscience 40:1916–1918

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempler C, Daubeny HA, Frey L, Walters T (2006) ‘Chemainus’ red raspberry. Hortscience 41:1364–1366

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy D, Duncan JM (1991) Methods for assessing the resistance of raspberry genotypes to Phytophthora root rot. Plant Pathol 40:387–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krawiec P, Krawiec M, Szot I (2016) The use of laminarin as an effective tool for anti-resistance management in chemical control of grey mould in raspberry. Acta Hortic 1133:469–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Man in ‘tVeld WA (2017) Gene flow analysis demonstrates that Phytophthora fragariae var. rubi constitutes a distinct species, Phytophthora rubi comb. nov. Mycologia 99(2):222–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin RR, MacFarlane S, Sabanadzovic S, Quito D, Poudel B, Tzanetakis IE (2013) Viruses and virus diseases of Rubus. Plant Dis 97:168–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin RR, Ellis MA, Williamson B, Williams RN (2017) Compendium of raspberry and blackberry diseases and pests, 2nd edn. APS, St. Paul

    Google Scholar 

  • McGavin WJ, Mitchell C, Cock PJA, Wright KM, MacFarlane SA (2012) Raspberry leaf blotch virus, a putative new member of the genus Emaravirus, encodes a novel genomic RNA. J Gen Virol 93:430–437

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McGregor GR, Franz P (2002) Field management of root rot in raspberries caused by Phytophthora spp. Acta Hortic 585:293–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore PP (2004) ‘Cascade delight’ red raspberry. Hortscience 39(1):185–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore PP (2006) ‘Cascade dawn’ red raspberry. Hortscience 41(3):857–859

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore PP, Finn CE (2007) ‘Cascade bounty’ red raspberry. Hortscience 42(2):393–396

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore PP, Hoashi-Erhardt W, Finn CE, Martin RR, Dossett M (2015) ‘Cascade harvest’ red raspberry. Hortscience 50:624–627

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill T, Wedgwood E, Berrie A, Allen J, Xu X (2012) Managing grey mould on raspberry grown under protection without use of fungicides during flowering and fruiting. Agron Sustain Dev, Springer Verlag/EDP Sciences/INRA 32(3):673–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pattison JA, Wilcox WF, Weber CA (2004) Assessing the resistance of red raspberry (Rubus idaeus L.) genotypes to Phytophthora fragariae var. rubi in hydroponic culture. Hortscience 39:1553–1556

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattison JA, Samuelian SK, Weber CA (2007) Inheritance of Phytophthora root rot resistance in red raspberry determined by generation means and molecular linkage analysis. Theor Appl Genet 115:225–236

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roen D, Heiberg N, Nestby R (2002) Breeding for root rot resistance in red raspberry. Acta Hortic 585:63–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox WF, Scott PH, Hamm PB, Kennedy DM, Duncan JM, Brassier CM, Hansen EM (1993) Identity of a Phytophthora species attacking raspberry in Europe and North America. Mycol Res 97:817–831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson B, Hargreaves AJ (1981) Effects of Didymella applanata and Botrytis cinerea on axillary buds, lateral shoots and yield of red raspberry. Ann Appl Biol 97:55–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson B, Jennings DL (1986) Common resistance to red raspberry to Botrytis cinerea and Didymella applanata, two pathogens occupying the same ecological niche. Ann Appl Biol 109:581–593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu H, Sutton JC (1998) Effects of inoculum density, wetness duration and temperature on control of Botrytis cinerea by Gliocladium roseum in raspberry. Can J Plant Pathol 20:243–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alison Dolan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dolan, A., MacFarlane, S., Jennings, S.N. (2018). Pathogens in Raspberry and Other Rubus spp.. In: Graham, J., Brennan, R. (eds) Raspberry. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99031-6_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics