Skip to main content

Vocabulary Instruction Through Patterns of Activity Sequencing Use: Revising the Understanding of Integration in Language Teaching

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
English Language Teaching Research in the Middle East and North Africa
  • 847 Accesses

Abstract

The present quasi-experimental study investigates the role of integrating the deep-end strategy, the task-based, and the scenario-based patterns of activity sequencing against the presentation–practice–production pattern in promoting the receptive vocabulary size (RVS) among 75 undergraduate English students at Sétif 2 University, Algeria. The study used the receptive vocabulary levels test (Schmitt et al. in Language Testing 18: 55–88, 2001) to measure the RVS of the students following a non-randomized control group pretest–post-test design. The obtained results revealed significant differences in the scores of the students on the used test, confirming that the pattern integration is effective in enhancing RVS growth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Beglar, D., & Hunt, A. (1999). Revising and validating the 2,000 word level and university word level vocabulary tests. Language Testing, 16, 131–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research on teaching. In N. L. Gage (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 171–246). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1966). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Pietro, R. J. (1987). Strategic interaction: Learning languages through scenarios. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R. (1988). The role of practice in classroom learning. AILA Review, 5, 20–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, S. (2004). Content matters: Building vocabulary and conceptual understanding in the subject areas. Middle School Journal, 35(3), 27–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harmer, J. (2001). The practice of english language teaching (3rd ed.). London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinkel, E. (2010). Integrating the four skills: Current and historical perspectives. In R. B. Kaplan (Ed.), Oxford handbook in applied linguistics (pp. 110–126). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K. (1982). Communicative syllabus design and methodology. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K. (1996). Language teaching and skill learning. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laufer, B. (1998). The development of passive and active vocabulary in a second language: Same or different? Applied Linguistics, 19, 255–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laufer, B., & Nation, P. (1999). A productive-size test of controlled productive ability. Language testing, 16, 33–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lessard-Clouston, M. (1996). Vocabulary and the ESL/EFL curriculum. TESL Reporter, 29(2), 21–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, M. (1993). The lexical approach: The state of ELT and the way forward. Hove: Language Teaching Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, M. (1996). Implications of a lexical view of language. In J. Willis & D. Willis (Eds.), Challenge and change in language teaching (pp. 10–16). Oxford: Macmillan Heineman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littlejohn, A. (1992). Why are ELT materials the way they are? (Doctoral dissertation). Lancaster University, Lancaster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littlejohn, A. (1998). The analysis of language teaching materials: Inside the Trojan horse. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.), Materials development in language teaching (pp. 190–216). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meara, P. (1992). EFL vocabulary tests. Swansea: University College Centre for Applied Language Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meara, P. (1996). The dimensions of lexical competence. In G. Brown, K. Malmkjaer, & J. Williams (Eds.), Performance and competence in second language acquisition (pp. 35–53). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milton, J. (2009). Measuring second language vocabulary acquisition. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nation, P. (1983). Teaching and testing vocabulary. Guidelines, 5, 12–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nation, P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nation, P. (2007). The four strands. Innovation in language learning and teaching, 1, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunan, D. (1991). Language teaching methodology: A textbook for teachers. New York: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxford, R. (2001). Integrated skills in the EFL/ESL classroom. ERIC Digest. ED456670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qian, D. D. (1999). Assessing the roles of depth and breadth of vocabulary knowledge in reading comprehension. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 56, 283–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Read, C. (1985). Presentation, practice, and production at a glance. In A. Matthews, M. Spratt, & L. Dangerfield (Eds.), At the chalkface (p. 17). London: Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Read, J. (1998). Validating a test to measure depth of vocabulary knowledge. In A. Kunnan (Ed.), Validation in language assessment (pp. 41–60). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Read, J. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, C. J. (2013). Curriculum approaches in language teaching: Forward, central, and backward design. RELC Journal 2013, 44(1), 5–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez, C. R. (2008). Patterns of activity sequencing in the teaching of English as a foreign language and their effects on learning: A quasi-experimental study (Doctoral dissertation). University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain. http://www.tesisenred.net/TDR-1021108-094744/index_cs.html.

  • Sanchez, C. R. (2013). A critical review of the presentation-practice-production model (PPP) in foreign language teaching. In R. Monroy (Ed.), Homenaje a Francisco Guttiérrez Diez (pp. 97–115). Murcia: University of Murcia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, N. (2001). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, N. (2010). Researching vocabulary: A vocabulary research manual. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, N., Schmitt, D., & Clapham, C. (2001). Developing and exploring the behaviour of two new versions of the vocabulary levels test. Language Testing, 18, 55–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skehan, P. (1996). A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction. Applied linguistics, 17, 38–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stake, R. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutarsyah, C., Nation, P., & Kennedy, G. (1994). How useful is EAP vocabulary for ESP? A corpus based case study. RELC Journal, 25(2), 34–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, B. (1998). Materials development in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, B., Bao, D., Masuhara, H., & Rubdy, R. (2001). Review of adult EFL courses. ELTJ, 55(1), 80–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willis, D. (1996a). Introduction. In J. Willis & D. Willis (Eds.), Challenge and change in language teaching (pp. iv–vi). Oxford: Macmillan Heineman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, D. (1996b). Accuracy, fluency and conformity. In J. Willis & D. Willis (Eds.), Challenge and change in language teaching (pp. 44–51). Oxford: Macmillan Heineman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, C. B. (1997). Historical trends in second language vocabulary instruction. In J. Coady & T. Huckin (Eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition: A rationale for pedagogy (pp. 5–19). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, K. J. (2004). The role of vocabulary size in assessing second language proficiency (Master’s thesis). Brigham Young University, Provo, USA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bouirane, A. (2019). Vocabulary Instruction Through Patterns of Activity Sequencing Use: Revising the Understanding of Integration in Language Teaching. In: Hidri, S. (eds) English Language Teaching Research in the Middle East and North Africa. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98533-6_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98533-6_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98532-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-98533-6

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics