Abstract
The present quasi-experimental study investigates the role of integrating the deep-end strategy, the task-based, and the scenario-based patterns of activity sequencing against the presentation–practice–production pattern in promoting the receptive vocabulary size (RVS) among 75 undergraduate English students at Sétif 2 University, Algeria. The study used the receptive vocabulary levels test (Schmitt et al. in Language Testing 18: 55–88, 2001) to measure the RVS of the students following a non-randomized control group pretest–post-test design. The obtained results revealed significant differences in the scores of the students on the used test, confirming that the pattern integration is effective in enhancing RVS growth.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Beglar, D., & Hunt, A. (1999). Revising and validating the 2,000 word level and university word level vocabulary tests. Language Testing, 16, 131–162.
Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research on teaching. In N. L. Gage (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 171–246). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1966). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Di Pietro, R. J. (1987). Strategic interaction: Learning languages through scenarios. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ellis, R. (1988). The role of practice in classroom learning. AILA Review, 5, 20–39.
Greenwood, S. (2004). Content matters: Building vocabulary and conceptual understanding in the subject areas. Middle School Journal, 35(3), 27–34.
Harmer, J. (2001). The practice of english language teaching (3rd ed.). London: Longman.
Hinkel, E. (2010). Integrating the four skills: Current and historical perspectives. In R. B. Kaplan (Ed.), Oxford handbook in applied linguistics (pp. 110–126). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Johnson, K. (1982). Communicative syllabus design and methodology. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Johnson, K. (1996). Language teaching and skill learning. Oxford: Blackwell.
Laufer, B. (1998). The development of passive and active vocabulary in a second language: Same or different? Applied Linguistics, 19, 255–271.
Laufer, B., & Nation, P. (1999). A productive-size test of controlled productive ability. Language testing, 16, 33–51.
Lessard-Clouston, M. (1996). Vocabulary and the ESL/EFL curriculum. TESL Reporter, 29(2), 21–33.
Lewis, M. (1993). The lexical approach: The state of ELT and the way forward. Hove: Language Teaching Publications.
Lewis, M. (1996). Implications of a lexical view of language. In J. Willis & D. Willis (Eds.), Challenge and change in language teaching (pp. 10–16). Oxford: Macmillan Heineman.
Littlejohn, A. (1992). Why are ELT materials the way they are? (Doctoral dissertation). Lancaster University, Lancaster.
Littlejohn, A. (1998). The analysis of language teaching materials: Inside the Trojan horse. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.), Materials development in language teaching (pp. 190–216). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Meara, P. (1992). EFL vocabulary tests. Swansea: University College Centre for Applied Language Studies.
Meara, P. (1996). The dimensions of lexical competence. In G. Brown, K. Malmkjaer, & J. Williams (Eds.), Performance and competence in second language acquisition (pp. 35–53). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Milton, J. (2009). Measuring second language vocabulary acquisition. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Nation, P. (1983). Teaching and testing vocabulary. Guidelines, 5, 12–25.
Nation, P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nation, P. (2007). The four strands. Innovation in language learning and teaching, 1, 1–12.
Nunan, D. (1991). Language teaching methodology: A textbook for teachers. New York: Prentice-Hall.
Oxford, R. (2001). Integrated skills in the EFL/ESL classroom. ERIC Digest. ED456670.
Qian, D. D. (1999). Assessing the roles of depth and breadth of vocabulary knowledge in reading comprehension. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 56, 283–307.
Read, C. (1985). Presentation, practice, and production at a glance. In A. Matthews, M. Spratt, & L. Dangerfield (Eds.), At the chalkface (p. 17). London: Addison Wesley.
Read, J. (1998). Validating a test to measure depth of vocabulary knowledge. In A. Kunnan (Ed.), Validation in language assessment (pp. 41–60). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Read, J. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Richards, C. J. (2013). Curriculum approaches in language teaching: Forward, central, and backward design. RELC Journal 2013, 44(1), 5–33.
Sanchez, C. R. (2008). Patterns of activity sequencing in the teaching of English as a foreign language and their effects on learning: A quasi-experimental study (Doctoral dissertation). University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain. http://www.tesisenred.net/TDR-1021108-094744/index_cs.html.
Sanchez, C. R. (2013). A critical review of the presentation-practice-production model (PPP) in foreign language teaching. In R. Monroy (Ed.), Homenaje a Francisco Guttiérrez Diez (pp. 97–115). Murcia: University of Murcia.
Schmitt, N. (2001). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schmitt, N. (2010). Researching vocabulary: A vocabulary research manual. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Schmitt, N., Schmitt, D., & Clapham, C. (2001). Developing and exploring the behaviour of two new versions of the vocabulary levels test. Language Testing, 18, 55–88.
Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Skehan, P. (1996). A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction. Applied linguistics, 17, 38–62.
Stake, R. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Sutarsyah, C., Nation, P., & Kennedy, G. (1994). How useful is EAP vocabulary for ESP? A corpus based case study. RELC Journal, 25(2), 34–50.
Tomlinson, B. (1998). Materials development in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tomlinson, B., Bao, D., Masuhara, H., & Rubdy, R. (2001). Review of adult EFL courses. ELTJ, 55(1), 80–101.
Willis, D. (1996a). Introduction. In J. Willis & D. Willis (Eds.), Challenge and change in language teaching (pp. iv–vi). Oxford: Macmillan Heineman.
Willis, D. (1996b). Accuracy, fluency and conformity. In J. Willis & D. Willis (Eds.), Challenge and change in language teaching (pp. 44–51). Oxford: Macmillan Heineman.
Zimmerman, C. B. (1997). Historical trends in second language vocabulary instruction. In J. Coady & T. Huckin (Eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition: A rationale for pedagogy (pp. 5–19). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zimmerman, K. J. (2004). The role of vocabulary size in assessing second language proficiency (Master’s thesis). Brigham Young University, Provo, USA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bouirane, A. (2019). Vocabulary Instruction Through Patterns of Activity Sequencing Use: Revising the Understanding of Integration in Language Teaching. In: Hidri, S. (eds) English Language Teaching Research in the Middle East and North Africa. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98533-6_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98533-6_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98532-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-98533-6
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)