Skip to main content

A Multilayer Framework for Service System Analysis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Service Science, Volume II

Abstract

As service science evolves as a discipline, an important ongoing focus for research has been modeling and representing entities as service systems in order to understand, represent, and innovate within service systems. Recently, there has been interest in exploring how data and data analytics are enabling service innovations within more traditional organizations. In this chapter, we present and evaluate a multilayer framework and analysis technique that can be used to describe an organization as a service system. The framework characterizes service systems within institutional arrangements, identifies key service system components, and describes the service ecosystem, internal relationships, and value-cocreating interactions. To test and validate the framework, we present the results of using the framework to analyze a mining company as a service system and identify ways in which data-intensive technologies can be used to integrate service innovations within it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akaka, M. A., & Vargo, S. K. (2014). Technology as an operant resource in service (eco)systems. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 12(3), 367-384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, M., Davidson, E., Prabhu, J., & Vargo, S. L. (2015). Service innovation in the digital age: Key contributions and future directions. MIS Quarterly, 39(1), 135-154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borangiu, T., & Polese, F. (2017). Introduction to the Special Issue on Exploring Service Science for Data-Driven Service Design and Innovation, 6 pages.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Breidbach, C. F., & Maglio, P. P. (2013). Does Big Data Provide Big Opportunities for Service Research? Service Excellence in Management, 187-189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donohue, K. (2017). Innovation in Clean Technologies Is Turning the Mining Industry Green. Retrieved March 29, 2018, from http://www.industryandbusiness.ca/development-and-innovation/innovation-in-clean-technologies-is-turning-the-mining-industry-green

  • Edvardsson, B., SkÃ¥lén, P., & Tronvoll, B. (2015). Service systems as a foundation for resource integration and value co-creation. Review of Marketing Research, 9, 79-126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frost, R., & Lyons, K. (2017). Service systems analysis methods and components: a systematic literature review. Service Science, 9(3), 219-234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frow, P., McColl-Kennedy, J. R., Hilton, T., Davidson, A., Payne, A., & Brozovic, D. (2014). Value propositions: A service ecosystems perspective. Marketing Theory, 14(3), 327-351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frow, P., Nenonen, S., Payne, A., & Storbacka, K. (2015). Managing co-creation design: A strategic approach to innovation. British Journal of Management, 26(3), 463-483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glushko, R. J. (2013). Describing service systems. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 23(1), 11-18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golnam, A., Ritala, P., Viswanathan, V., & Wegmann, A. (2012). Modeling value creation and capture in service systems. In M. Snene (Ed.), Exploring Services Science: Third International Conference, IESS 2012, Geneva, Switzerland, February 15-17, 2012 Proceedings. Springer, 155-169.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Herterich, M. M., Buehnen, T., Uebernickel, F., & Brenner, W. (2016, January). A Taxonomy of Industrial Service Systems Enabled by Digital Product Innovation. In 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), (pp. 1236-1245)

    Google Scholar 

  • IfM and IBM. (2008). Succeeding through service innovation: a service perspective for education, research, business and government. University of Cambridge Institute for Manufacturing, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katzan, H. (2009). Principles of service systems: An ontological approach. Journal of Service Science, 2(2), 35–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutsikos, K., Konstantopoulos, N., Sakas, D., & Verginadis, Y. (2014). Developing and managing digital service ecosystems: A service science viewpoint. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 16(3), 233-248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laud, G., Karpen, I. O., Mulye, R., & Rahman, K. (2015). The role of embeddedness for resource integration: Complementing S-D logic research through a social capital perspective. Marketing Theory, 15(4), 509-543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lessard, L., & Yu, E. (2013). Service systems design: An intentional agent perspective. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 23(1), 68-75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, C., Kim, K. H., Kim, M. J., Heo, J. Y., Kim, K. J., & Maglio, P. P. (2018a). From data to value: A nine-factor framework for data-based value creation in information-intensive services. International Journal of Information Management, 39, 121-135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, C., Kim, M. J., Kim, K. H., Kim, K. J., & Maglio, P. P. (2018b). Using data to advance service: managerial issues and theoretical implications from action research. Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 28(1), 99-128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lusch, R. F., & Nambisan, S. (2015). Service innovation: A service-dominant logic perspective. MIS Quarterly, 39(1), 155-175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, K., & Tracy, S. (2013). Characterizing organizations as service systems. Humans Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 23(1), 19-27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maglio, P. P., & Spohrer, J. (2013). A service science perspective on business model innovation. Industrial Marketing Management, 42(5), 665-670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maglio, P. P., Vargo, S. L., Caswell, N., & Spohrer, J. (2009). The service system is the basic abstraction of service science. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 7(4), 395-406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mele, C., Colurcio, M., & Russo-Spena, T. (2014). Research traditions of innovation: Goods-dominant logic, the resource-based approach, and service-dominant logic. Managing Service Quality, 24(6), 612-642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patricio, L., Fisk, R. P., e Cunha, J. F., & Constantine, L. (2011). Multilevel service design: From customer value constellation to service experience blueprinting. Journal of Service Research, 14(2), 180-200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siltaloppi, J., & Vargo, S. L. (2014). Reconciling resource integration and value propositions – the dynamics of value co-creation. 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Science (HICSS), 1278-1284.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1976). Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organization. (3rd ed.). New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spohrer, J., & Maglio, P. P. (2008). The emergence of service science: Toward systematic service innovations to accelerate co-creation of value. Production and operations management, 17(3), 238-246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spohrer, J., Piciocchi, P., & Bassano, C. (2012). Three frameworks for service research: exploring multilevel governance in nested, networked systems. Service Science, 4(2), 147-160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2016). Institutions and axioms: An extension and update of service-dominant logic. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(5), 5-23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. L., Wieland, H., & Akaka, M. A. (2015). Innovation through institutionalization: A service ecosystems perspective. Industrial Marketing Management, 44, 63-72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wan, Z., & Zhang, M. (2013). Value cocreation through resource integration: New insights into container inpection ecosystems. 2013 I.E. International Conference on Service Operations and Logistics and Informatics (SOLI), 528-533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., Lai, J., & Hsiao, L. (2015). Value network analysis for complex service systems: A case study on Taiwan’s mobile application services. Service Business, 9(3), 381-407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly, 26(2), xiii-xxiii.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kelly Lyons .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Frost, R.B., Cheng, M., Lyons, K. (2019). A Multilayer Framework for Service System Analysis. In: Maglio, P.P., Kieliszewski, C.A., Spohrer, J.C., Lyons, K., Patrício, L., Sawatani, Y. (eds) Handbook of Service Science, Volume II. Service Science: Research and Innovations in the Service Economy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98512-1_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics