Skip to main content

Foresight

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible
  • 167 Accesses

Abstract

Forecasting, Foresight, and Anticipation are considered to be the basic components of Futures Studies. Forecasting deals with data extrapolation; Foresight with the visualization of possible futures; and Anticipation with the translation of their outcomes into action. The overall structure of Futures Studies comprises the differences between megatrend and exploration, risk and uncertainty, and complicatedness and complexity. Finally, the idea of Futures Literacy is introduced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amara, R. (1981). The futures field: Searching for definitions and boundaries. The Futurist, 15(1), 25–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, J. S. (2001). Principles of forecasting. Dordrecht: Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuhls, K. (2003). From forecasting to foresight processes – New participative foresight activities in Germany. Journal of Forecasting, 22, 93–111. https://doi.org/10.1002/for.848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Jouvenel, B. (1967). The art of conjecture. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derbyshire, J. (2017). The siren call of probability: Dangers associated with using probability for consideration of the future. Futures, 88, 43–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derbyshire, J., & Wright, G. (2017). Augmenting the intuitive logics scenario planning method for a more comprehensive analysis of causation. International Journal of Forecasting, 33(1), 254–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gary, J. E. (2009). Foresight styles assessment: Testing a new tool for consulting futurists. Journal of Futures Studies, 14(1), 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayward, P. (2003). Foresight in everyday life. Melbourne: Australian Foresight Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hines, A., Gary, J., Daheim, C., & van der Laan, L. (2017). Building foresight capacity: Toward a foresight competency model. World Futures Review, 9(3), 123–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J. M. (1921). Treatise on probability. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk, uncertainty and profit. Boston: Hart, Schaffner & Marx.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows, D. (1999). Leverage points. Places to intervene in a system. Retrieved from http://donellameadows.org/archives/leverage-points-places-to-intervene-in-a-system/

  • Miller, R. (2007). Futures literacy: A hybrid strategic scenario method. Futures, 39(4), 341–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2006.12.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. (2011). Futures literacy. Embracing complexity and using the future. Ethos, 10, 23–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. (2018). Transforming the future: Anticipation in the 21st century. Paris/Oxford: UNESCO-Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poli, R. (2016). Belief systems and the modeling relation. Foundations of Science, 21, 195–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poli, R. (2017). Introduction to anticipation studies. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Poli, R. (2019). Working with the future. Milan: Bocconi University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1996). What is strategy? In On competition. Boston: Harvard Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringland, G. (1998). Scenario planning: Managing for the future. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohrbeck, R. (2010). Corporate foresight: Towards a maturity model for the future orientation of a firm. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohrbeck, R., & Kum, M. E. (2018). Corporate foresight and its impact on firm performance: A longitudinal analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 129, 105–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, R. (2012). Anticipatory systems. Philosophical, mathematical, and methodological foundations (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, P. (1991). The art of the long view. New York: Penguin Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shackle, G. L. S. (1955). Uncertainty in economics and other reflections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taleb, N. N. (2007). The black swan. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuomi, I. (2019). Chronotopes of foresight: Models of time-space in probabilistic, possibilistic and constructivist futures. Futures & Foresight Science. 1:e11. https://doi.org/10.1002/ffo2.11.

  • van der Laan, L., & Erwee, R. (2012). Foresight styles assessment: A valid and reliable measure of dimensions of foresight competence? Foresight, 14(5), 374–386. https://doi.org/10.1108/14636681211269860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voros, J. (2003). A generic foresight process framework. Foresight, 5(3), 10–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roberto Poli .

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Poli, R. (2020). Foresight. In: The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98390-5_76-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98390-5_76-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98390-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-98390-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics