Skip to main content

Possible in Sociology

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible

Abstract

Sociology – as both science and mode of societal self-reflection – was made possible by the conjunction of mid-nineteenth century European philosophical thought with the historical crises erupting within the emerging industrial societies in the West. Sociology, once established, evolved to make possible a proliferation of perspectives for studying a newly constituted ontological space identified by Auguste Comte. What, exactly, that ontological space denotes and how it is to be studied is at the center of debates within contemporary sociology. For Comte, sociology promised nothing less than a scientific blueprint for the reconstruction of society; a possible world that would be free of conflict, strife, and, especially, what he considered to be the disease of the West: individualism and its quixotic attachment to freedom of thought. To others, such a deterministic, authoritarian perspective was a precursor of the totalitarian societies of the twentieth century. Understanding this genealogy and imagining what possible worlds might await us is the unfinished business of that discipline that goes by the name “sociology.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Berlin, I. (1959/1969). “John Stuart Mill and the Ends of Life” in Four essays on liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comte, A. (1822/1970). Plan of the scientific operations necessary for reorganizing society. Pp. 269–306 in On intellectuals: theoretical case studies. Garden City, New York: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1994). The birth of the clinic: an archaeology of medical perception. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manuel, F. E. (1962). The prophets of Paris. New York: Harper Torchbooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. Marx to Engels in Manchester, July 7.1866. First published in Der Briefwechsel zwischen F. Engels und K. Marx, Bd. 3, Stuttgart, 1913. Collected Writings, Vol. 42, p. 291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C. W. (1959). The sociological imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, B. (1953). Social Science and the Humanists. The American Scholar 22(2): 203–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, A. (1962). In praise of enlightenment: essays in the history of ideas. Cleveland/New York: Meridian Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schütz, A. (1967). The Phenomenology of the Social World. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Wiese, L. (1932). Systematic Sociology. New York: J. Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard Randell .

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Lybrand, S., Randell, R. (2022). Possible in Sociology. In: The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98390-5_25-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98390-5_25-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98390-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-98390-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics