Skip to main content

Electoral Systems and Political Reforms: Portugal in Comparative Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Political Institutions and Democracy in Portugal

Abstract

The chapter reflects on some of the fundamental problems associated with electoral reform or, more generally, with the choice of electoral systems. Different types of electoral system tend to have different underlying fundamental goals. To achieve the objectives underlying each electoral system different instrumental solutions are employed. The different fundamental objectives the various electoral systems target, as well as the differentiated solutions they adopt to achieve them, are not easily reconcilable, at least fully, and therefore there must always be some form of trade-off. However, some solutions seek precisely to reconcile goals that are to some extent contradictory. Considering the performance of Portuguese electoral system in terms of proportionality, cabinet stability and quality of representation (i.e. the pattern of relationships between the voters, parties and candidates/members of parliament), as well as the necessary trade-off in each and every choice, the chapter reflects on the aspects of the electoral system that need more or less of reforms and how to reconcile the maintenance of proportionality, the strengthening of executive stability and increasing the intensity of links between voters and deputies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, C. J. (2000). Economic Voting and Political Context. Electoral Studies, 19(2/3), 151–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C. J., & Guillory, C. A. (1997). Political Institutions and Satisfaction with Democracy: A Cross-National Analysis of Consensus and Majoritarian Systems. American Political Science Review, 91(1), 66–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arter, D. (2006). Democracy in Scandinavia: Consensual, Majoritarian or Mixed? Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blais, A., & Dobrzynska, A. (1998). Turnout in Electoral Democracies. European Journal of Political Research, 33, 239–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtice, J., & Shively, P. (2003). Quem nos representa melhor? Um deputado ou vários? Análise Social, 167, 361–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duverger, M. (1951). Os Partidos Políticos. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eneyedi, Z., & Todosijevic, B. (2009). Adversarial Politics, Civic Virtues and Partisanship in Eastern and Western Europe. In J. Bartle & P. Belluci (Eds.), Political Parties and Partisanship: Social Identity and Political Attitudes (pp. 142–161). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, M. (2002). The Dynamics of Electoral Participation. In L. LeDuc, R. G. Niemi, & P. Norris (Eds.), Comparing Democracies 2: New Challenges in the Study of Elections and Voting (pp. 148–168). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, A. (2006). Esquerda e Direita na Política Europeia: Portugal, Espanha e Grécia em Perspectiva Comparada. Lisbon: Imprensa de Ciências Sociais.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, A. (2009). Mudança do sistema partidário em Portugal, 1974–2009: O papel dos factores políticos, sociais e ideológicos. In M. A. Cruz (Ed.), Eleições e Sistemas Eleitorais: Perspectivas Históricas e Políticas. Porto: Universidade do Porto Editorial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, A. (2010). Reformas eleitorais: Objetivos, soluções, efeitos prováveis e trade-offs necessários. Eleições, 12, 25–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, A. (2011). Constituição e sistema político-eleitoral. In N. Garoupa, M. P. Maduro, P. Magalhães, & J. Tavares (Eds.), A Constituição Revista (pp. 73–79). Lisbon: Editora Fundação Francisco Manuel dos Santos. Available at http://www.ffms.pt/upload/docs/0793dd50-3e18-478a-be1f-42b179181dde.pdf.

  • Freire, A. (2013). Crise e transformação nas esquerdas europeias, antes e depois do fim dos regimes do “socialismo realmente existente” (1989–1991). In P. A. Oliveira (Ed.), O Fim da URSS, a Nova Rússia e a Crise das Esquerdas (pp. 247–302). Lisbon: FMS-IHC-UNL/Colibri.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, A. (2014, September 29). Crise das democracias e reformas dos sistemas eleitorais, opinion article in the Portuguese daily newspaper. Público. https://www.publico.pt/2014/09/24/politica/opiniao/a-crise-das-democracias-e-a-reforma-dos-sistemas-eleitorais-1670588.

  • Freire, A. (2015). Left-Right Ideology as a Dimension of Identification and as a Dimension of Competition. Journal of Political Ideologies, 20(1), 43–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freire, A. (2017). Para lá da «Geringonça» : O Governo de Esquerdas em Portugal e na Europa. Lisbon: Contraponto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, A. (2018). Sistemas eleitorais e reformas políticas: Portugal em perspetiva comparada. In C. P. Teixeira (Ed.), O Sistema Político Português: Uma Perspetiva Comparada (pp. 155–186). Cascais: Principia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, A., & Belchior, A. (2013). Ideological Representation in Portugal: Mps-Electors Linkages in Terms of Left-Right Placement and Substantive Meaning. Journal of Legislative Studies, 19(1), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freire, A., & Lobo, M. C. (2005). Economics, Ideology and Vote: Southern Europe, 1985–2000. European Journal of Political Research, 44(4), 493–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freire, A., & Meirinho, M. (2012). Institutional Reform in Portugal: From the Perspective of Deputies and Voters’ Perspectives. Pôle Sud – Revue de Science Politique, 36, 107–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, A., & Papp, Z. (2014). Electoral Rules and Legislators’ Personal Vote-Seeking. In K. Deschouwer & S. Depaw (Eds.), Representing the People: A Survey Among Members of Statewide and Substrate Parliaments (pp. 87–109). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, A., & Santana-Pereira, J. (2016). The Portuguese National Election of 2015: From Austerity to the Fall of the Portuguese “Berlin Wall”. Pôle Sud – Revue de Science Politique, 44(1), 142–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, A., Meirinho, M., & Moreira, D. (2008). Para uma Melhoria da Qualidade da Representação: A Reforma do Sistema Eleitoral. Lisbon: Sextante.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, M., & Mitchell, P. (2008). The Politics of Electoral Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, E., & Sauger, N. (2007). Introduction aux Systèmes Politiques Nationaux de l’UE. Bruxelles: De Boeck Université.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackman, R. W. (1987). Political Institutions and Voter Turnout in the Industrial Democracies. American Political Science Review, 81, 405–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackman, R. W., & Miller, R. A. (1998). Voter Turnout in the Industrial Democracies During the 1980s. In P. Norris (Ed.), Elections and Voting Behaviour: New Challenges, New Perspectives (pp. 305–330). Dartmouth: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, A. (1999). Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, A. (2006). The Case for Power Sharing. In L. Diamond & M. F. Plattner (Eds.), Electoral Systems and Democracy (pp. 42–55). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, A. (2007). Thinking About Democracy: Power Sharing and Majority Rule in Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lobo, M. C. (2008, December 11). A reforma do sistema eleitoral, opinion article included in the Portuguese newspaper. Jornal de Negócios. https://www.jornaldenegocios.pt/opiniao/detalhe/a_reforma_do_sistema_eleitoral.

  • Lopes, F. F., & Freire, A. (2002). Partidos Políticos e Sistemas Eleitorais: Uma Introdução. Oeiras: Celta.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, L. (2008). Contemporary Far Left Parties in Europe: From Marxism to the Mainstream? Fundação Friedrich Ebert, 11/2008. Available at library.fes.de/pdf-files/id/ipa/05818.pdf.

  • March, L., & Freire, A. (2012). A Esquerda Radical em Portugal e na Europa: Marxismo, Mainstream ou Marginalidade? Porto: Quid Novi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massicotte, L., & Blais, A. (1999). Mixed Electoral Systems: A Conceptual and Empirical Survey. Electoral Studies, 18(3), 341–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meirinho, M. (2004). Participação Política e Democracia: O Caso Português 1976–2000. Lisbon: Instituto Superior de Ciências Sociais e Políticas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreira, V. (2008a, December 16). Uma proposta falhada. Público.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreira, V. (2008b, December 23). Mais defeitos do que virtudes. Público.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nohlen, D. (1984). Two Incompatible Principles of Representation. In A. Lijphart & B. Großman (Eds.), Choosing an Electoral System: Issues and Alternatives (pp. 83–90). New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nohlen, D. (1995). Sistemas Electorales y Systemas de Partidos. Mexico City: Fondo e Cultura Económica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nohlen, D. (2007). Os Sistemas Eleitorais: O Contexto faz a Diferença. Lisbon: Horizonte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortega, C. (2004). Los Sistemas de Voto Preferencial: Un Estudio de 16 Democracias. Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas Siglo XXI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilet, J.-B., Freire, A. & Costa, O. (2012). Ballot Structure, District Magnitude and Constituency-Orientation of MPs in Proportional Representation and Majority Electoral Systems. Representation—Journal of Representative Democracy, 48 (4), 359–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, G. B. (2000). Elections as Instruments of Democracy: Majoritarian and Proportional Visions. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rae, D. (1969). The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rule, W., & Zimmerman, J. (Eds.). (1994). Electoral Systems in Comparative Perspective: Their Impact on Women and Minorities. Westport, CT: Greenwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, H. (2009). Partisanship in Nine Democracies: Causes and Consequences. In J. Bartle & P. Belluci (Eds.), Political Parties and Partisanship: Social Identity and Political Attitudes (pp. 75–87). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shugart, M. S., & Wattenberg, M. P. (Eds.). (2000). Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessels, B., & Schmitt, H. (2008). Meaningful Choices, Political Supply and Institutional Effectiveness. Electoral Studies, 28, 19–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to André Freire .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Freire, A. (2019). Electoral Systems and Political Reforms: Portugal in Comparative Perspective. In: Costa Pinto, A., Pequito Teixeira, C. (eds) Political Institutions and Democracy in Portugal. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98152-9_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics